{"id":4,"date":"2011-10-18T20:44:27","date_gmt":"2011-10-18T20:44:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/?p=4"},"modified":"2011-10-18T20:44:27","modified_gmt":"2011-10-18T20:44:27","slug":"24th-october-31st-sunday-of-the-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/?p=4","title":{"rendered":"October 24th &#8211; 31st Sunday of the Year"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h1 class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: left;\" align=\"center\"><span class=\"vv1\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-variant: small-caps;\">Response to Faith with thr Bible<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n<p><strong>Bible texts: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/\">www.<span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">biblegateway.com<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span class=\"vv1\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">A. The Bible as Guide in Life and Liturgy (Sunday Readings)<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span class=\"vv1\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">B. The Bible in Dialogue with Questions of the Day<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: center;\" align=\"center\"><span class=\"vv1\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-variant: small-caps;\">October 24 <span>\u00a0<\/span>31<sup>st<\/sup> Sunday of the Year (Year 1)<\/span><\/strong><em><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: center;\" align=\"center\"><span class=\"vv1\"><em><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">(November 14<sup>th<\/sup> for Feast of Christ the King; A. Sunday Readings; B. Dialogue: Atheism, Monotheism, Divine Revelation)<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span class=\"vv1\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">A. The Bible as Guide. Readings for 31<sup>st<\/sup> Sunday<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<strong><span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">B. Dialogue with Questions of the Day<\/span>: Genesis chapter 1-2, esp. 1:1-2:4; Darwinism, Natural Selection or\/and Intelligent Design, <em>rationes seminales<\/em> (germinal principles or original factors)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span class=\"vv1\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">Readings for 31<sup>st<\/sup> Sunday<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<span class=\"vv1\"><em><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">a) Bible Readings God\u2019s Word, immediacy and distanciation<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<span class=\"vv1\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">The document on the Liturgy of Vatican II speaks of the various ways in which Christ is present in his Church to carry out his plan of salvation. One is \u201c<\/span><\/span>He is present in His word, since it is He Himself who speaks when the holy scriptures are read in the Church\u201d. This belief gives a sense of immediacy to the Scripture readings, as if a particular reading was addressed to each individual.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0While there is truth in this, the distance (of 2000 years or more) between the present-day hearer and the original text and its originally intended message and meaning must be borne in mind, both as an aid to overcome difficulties in understanding the text and to avoid too facile application to present-day personal or other situations.<span>\u00a0 <\/span>In fact, understanding a particular reading in its original setting within an entire book can help us better appreciate its message for our own day.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<span class=\"vv1\"><em><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">First Reading<\/span><\/em><\/span><span class=\"vv1\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">, from the prophet Malachi (Mal 1:14-2:2,8-10). For the background to this reading it may be well recall some of the dates of Jewish history given for an earlier Sunday\u2019s liturgy (29<sup>th<\/sup> Sunday, October 10):<span>\u00a0 <\/span>Fall of Israel to Assyrian Empire 721 BC; Destruction of Jerusalem by Babylonians (Nebuchadnezzar) 586 BC; Babylonian Exile 586-539 BC; Cyrus the Persian (non-Semite; Indo-European) conquers Asia Minor and is about to conquer Babylon 540 BC. In 539 he permits the Jewish exiles to return home and rebuild the Temple. Work on rebuilding did not seriously begin until the reign of Darius (522-520), under the inspiration of the two prophets Haggai and Zechariah, with Zerubbabel, probably grandson of the last king of Judah, as governor. It was a period of great hope for the future, after the inspiring oracles of Second Isaiah. The rebuilding of the Temple was completed in 515. Soon afterwards matters seem to have changed from the worse. Zerubbabel disappears from the scene, probably removed by the Persian authorities who feared an attempt to restore the Davidic dynasty. The new governors of Judah would be Persians. The economic situation got worse and the population and priesthood probably got disheartened.<span>\u00a0 <\/span>Diseased and maimed beasts were being offered as sacrifice in the Temple. The priesthood itself seems to have got lethargic and half-hearted with regard to Temple worship and instruction of the people, the priests (Levites) forgetting the<span>\u00a0 <\/span>models and traditions that should inspire them, the covenant of God with Levi from which they believed they descended and the covenant of God with all Israel (with Abraham and Moses at Sinai). It is against this background that the book of Malachi, composed possibly between 515 and 450, and today\u2019s reading should be understood as first intended. The message of the book, and this present reading, has a message for all ages, and for us today. As one commentator on the book of Malachi (M. Daniel Carroll R.) puts it at the end of his introduction: \u201cThe theme of worship and its connection with the call for exemplary leadership make the book of Malachi ever relevant. Today there is much interest in liturgical renewal. Liberation theology, for example, has stressed the inseparable link between worship and praxis. What is more, in an age of so much scandal among those in positions of religious authority, many look for those who might represent integrity and sound moral values\u201d.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span class=\"vv1\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\"><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>When the present Sunday lectionary was published in 1969, this Sunday\u2019s first reading was chosen as an Old Testament passage to go with the Gospel reading\u2019s censure of the Pharisees. It has a much more poignant message for the Church in our own day.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<span class=\"vv1\"><em><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">Second Reading (<\/span><\/em><\/span><span class=\"vv1\"><span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">1 Thessalonians 2:7-9,13). To situate this reading better it may be well to recall what Paul has just said in the preceding verses (<\/span><\/span>1 Thessalonians 2:3-6; New International Version (NIV): <sup>\u201c3<\/sup> For the appeal we make does not spring from error or impure motives, nor are we trying to trick you. <sup>4<\/sup> On the contrary, we speak as those approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel. We are not trying to please people but God, who tests our hearts. <sup>5<\/sup> You know we never used flattery, nor did we put on a mask to cover up greed\u2014God is our witness. <sup>6<\/sup> We were not looking for praise from people, not from you or anyone else, even though as apostles of Christ we could have asserted our authority\u201d.<span>\u00a0 <\/span>In Paul\u2019s world there were itinerant preachers and philosophers of different kinds, trying to win favour with their audiences. Paul is keen to differentiate himself, and preachers of the Christian Gospel, from these both in his message and in his way of life. The Christian message requires honesty in presentation and conformity to it in one\u2019s life. Paul goes beyond ordinary Christian requirements in this. There was a Gospel principle, attributed to Christ himself, that those who preach the Gospel may live by the Gospel, that is by material support from believers. Paul worked with his hands, probably as a tent maker. Together with these principles of Christian apostolate, Paul was united with his churches by genuine affection. Paul is overjoyed, and thanks God, for the deep faith of his converts. They have accepted the Gospel (the word of God) for what it is \u2013 not just a proclamation of Christ\u2019s saving work but a real power that makes the living of the Gospel in all that it demands (honesty, transparency, lack of \u201chypocrisy\u201d,<span>\u00a0 <\/span>play-acting) a living reality.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><em><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-weight: normal;\">The Gospel<\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-weight: normal;\"> (Matthew 23:7-9.12). This is the opening section of Jesus\u2019 condemnation of the scribes and Pharisees. In this reading Jesus addresses to \u201cthe people and his disciples\u201d a warning concerning the scribes and the Pharisees, who are said to occupy the chair of Moses. They are said to wear \u201cbroader phylacteries\u201d and \u201clonger tassels\u201d (than others) to attract attention. A phylactery (a Greek word, safeguard, amulet) was a small case containing scripture verses, worn on the arm and forehead by the Jew while praying, as commanded in Deuteronomy 6:8 (Deut 6:6-8: Deuteronomy 6:6-8- New International Version (NIV): \u201c<sup>6<\/sup>These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. <sup>7<\/sup> Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. <sup>8<\/sup> Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads\u201d.<span>\u00a0 <\/span>The \u201ctassels\u201d or fringes on garments were commanded by the Torah (Jewish Law, Pentateuch): Numbers 15:37-39&#8211; New International Version (NIV) \u201cTassels on Garments\u201d: \u201c<sup>37<\/sup>The LORD said to Moses, <sup>38<\/sup> \u201cSpeak to the Israelites and say to them: \u2018Throughout the generations to come you are to make tassels on the corners of your garments, with a blue cord on each tassel. <sup>39<\/sup> You will have these tassels to look at and so you will remember all the commands of the LORD, that you may obey them and not prostitute yourselves by chasing after the lusts of your own hearts and eyes\u201d (see also Deuteronomy 22:12). Both usages were widely practised, also by Jesus; see Mat 9:20; 14:36. In the section in today\u2019s Gospel reading Jesus condemns the ostentation of the scribes and Pharisees, and their devising new burdensome laws for the ordinary people.<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>The Pharisees were a lay group whose origins go back to well before 100 BC. There were well known as meticulous interpreters of the traditional laws (of Mo<span lang=\"EN\">ses) and also for having a tradition of their own with many observances of detail going beyond these laws. In Palestine in the time of Christ their numbers were about 6000, but their influence on popular opinion and piety far outweighed this. The scribes were trained lawyers, in the traditional religious laws and possibly other laws as well. While not necessarily of the Pharisee party, very many of them probably sympathized with them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>During the public ministry, Jesus and his disciples were often in contact and dispute with the Pharisees. After the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in AD 70 Jewish thought and religion were reorganized under the influence of scribes, Pharisees and related groups, to become by AD 200 the Judaism we know today, with renowned leaders and teachers known as Rabbi, Abba (\u201cFather\u201d) and other titles. This is the renascent Judaism that the evangelist Matthew and his Christian community would have known. During Jesus\u2019 ministry and after the resurrection it may have been their influence that explains the few Jewish converts to the early Church. In the next verse after today\u2019s reading Jesus\u2019 continues his diatribe (Mat 23:13; NIV): <\/span><sup>13<\/sup> \u201cWoe to you, teachers of the law (=scribes) and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of heaven in people\u2019s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>In this reading the scribes and Pharisees are used as a foil to Matthew\u2019s Christian community. Their behaviour should be the opposite of that condemned by Jesus, a community with no consciousness of status, in teaching or otherwise, one of transparency where behaviour mirrored belief. The early Church had teachers (Ephesians 4:11), one of the many gifts of the Risen Lord, intended to build up the Christian community in love. In Mat 13:52 Christ speaks of scribes of the kingdom of heaven.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Before conversion the apostle Paul was a Pharisee: \u201cas to the law a Pharisee, &#8230; as to righteousness under the law, blameless\u201d (Philippians 3:6). Reflecting on his own Jewish people\u2019s failure to accept Christ, he says sadly (Romans 10:1-4, NIV):<span>\u00a0 <\/span>\u201c<sup>1<\/sup>Brothers and sisters, my heart\u2019s desire and prayer to God for the Israelites is that they may be saved. <sup>2<\/sup> For I can testify about them that they are zealous for God, but their zeal is not based on knowledge. <sup>3<\/sup> Since they did not know the righteousness of God and sought to establish their own, they did not submit to God\u2019s righteousness. <sup>4<\/sup> Christ is the culmination of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reflection on the three readings. (1) <em><span>\u00a0<\/span><\/em><\/strong>With regard to the first (OT) reading recall Paul in Romans 15:4: \u201cFor whatever was written in former days (i.e. in the Old Testament) was written for our instruction, so that by the <strong>steadfastness<\/strong> and by the encouragement of the scriptures we might have hope\u201d. Steadfastness, staying power, is a central part of Christian hope. The first reading reminds us of the ups and downs of a nation\u2019s and an individual\u2019s life: Great expectations, recessions, temptation to forget the demands of the original covenants; the presence of prophecy. (2) The second reading recalls the importance of not forgetting the central mission of the Christian religion: to continue the saving mission of Christ. (3) All readings stress the importance of transparency at all levels of Christian life, authority, clerics, religious, laity, so that in Paul\u2019s words (2 Cor 4:6) Christians may be continuing witnesses to \u201cthe knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(<em>End of Guide to readings for 31<sup>st<\/sup> Sunday of the Year<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><strong><span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">B. Dialogue with Questions of the Day<\/span>: Genesis chapter 1-2, esp. 1:1-2:4; Darwinism, Natural Selection or\/and Intelligent Design, <em>rationes seminales<\/em> (germinal principles or original factors)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><strong>Internet links: <em>Natural selection; Darwinism; intelligent design; rationes seminales<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><strong>Some reflections on God and intelligent design:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><strong>See Jeremiah 18:2-6 and Roman 9:9:21<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">Jeremiah 18:2-6<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"txt-sm\">New International Version (NIV)<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><sup>2<\/sup> \u201cGo down to the potter\u2019s house, and there I will give you my message.\u201d <sup>3<\/sup> So I went down to the potter\u2019s house, and I saw him working at the wheel. <sup>4<\/sup> But the pot he was shaping from the clay was marred in his hands; so the potter formed it into another pot, shaping it as seemed best to him.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>5<\/sup> Then the word of the LORD came to me. <sup>6<\/sup> He said, \u201cCan I not do with you, Israel, as this potter does?\u201d declares the LORD. \u201cLike clay in the hand of the potter, so are you in my hand, Israel.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">Romans 9:19-21<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"txt-sm\">New International Version (NIV)<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>19<\/sup> One of you will say to me: \u201cThen why does God still blame us? For who is able to resist his will?\u201d <sup>20<\/sup> But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? \u201cShall what is formed say to the one who formed it, \u2018Why did you make me like this?\u2019\u201d<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=romans%209:19-21&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-28176a#fen-NIV-28176a\" title=\"See footnote a\">a<\/a>]<\/sup> <sup>21<\/sup> Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt;\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-weight: normal;\">Selections from Augustinus Hibernicus, <em>On the Miracles of Holy Scripture<\/em> (an Irish writer, writing in Latin, AD 655, in the translation of John Carey, <em>King of Mysteries. Early Irish Religious Writings<\/em> (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2000), pp. 51-74, 52-53. (selections), at <\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">This, as the authority of the Book of Genesis confirms, was brought to pass in the course of the passing of six days, so that it can be maintained with complete certainty that on the sixth day everything pertaining to the disposition and arrangement of the creation was completed, For thus it is written: \u2018And on the sixth day God completed all his works, and blessed the seventh day, because in it he rested from all his works. (Genesis 2:2)<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">From this it is understood that on the sixth day God completed all things, so that on the seventh day he may be seen to have ceased, not from toiling <em>(a labore),<\/em> but from working <em>(ab opera)<\/em>. But since the Lord Jesus answered the Jews who were asking about rest on the Sabbath, saying \u2018My Father is working until now, and I am working\u2019 (John 5:17, we both believe that he finished all things on the sixth day and resed on the seventh, and also do not doubt that he is working until now. But we must consider more carefully how the same God can be considered to have finished the, and to be working now.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">On the sixth day he completed his work on the natures of created things, but even now he does not cease to govern them; and on the seventh day he rested from the work of creation (<em>ab opera creationis<\/em>), but he never ceases from the exercise of government (<em>a gubernationis regimine<\/em>). For we are to understand that God was a Creator then (tunc -. Creator), but is a Governor now (nunc Gubernaror). Therefore if among created things we see anything new arise, God should not be thought to have created a new nature, but to be governing that which he created formerly. But his power in governing his creation is so great that he may seem to be creating a new nature, when he is only bringing forth from the hidden depths of its [existing] nature that which lay concealed within.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">2:<span>\u00a0 <\/span>\u2018Govern\u2019 is not an ideal translation here, but I hope that in the context it will make sense<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\"><span>\u00a0<\/span>Genesis 1:1-2:24, especially 1:1-2:4a<\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"txt-sm1\">New International Version (NIV)<\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Genesis 1<\/span><\/h4>\n<h5><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Beginning<\/span><\/h5>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<sup>1<\/sup> In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. <sup>2<\/sup> Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>3<\/sup> And God said, \u201cLet there be light,\u201d and there was light. <sup>4<\/sup> God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. <sup>5<\/sup> God called the light \u201cday,\u201d and the darkness he called \u201cnight.\u201d And there was evening, and there was morning\u2014the first day.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>6<\/sup> And God said, \u201cLet there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.\u201d <sup>7<\/sup> So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. <sup>8<\/sup> God called the vault \u201csky.\u201d And there was evening, and there was morning\u2014the second day.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>9<\/sup> And God said, \u201cLet the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.\u201d And it was so. <sup>10<\/sup> God called the dry ground \u201cland,\u201d and the gathered waters he called \u201cseas.\u201d And God saw that it was good. <br \/> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<sup>11<\/sup> Then God said, \u201cLet the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.\u201d And it was so. <sup>12<\/sup> The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. <sup>13<\/sup> And there was evening, and there was morning\u2014the third day.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>14<\/sup> And God said, \u201cLet there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, <sup>15<\/sup> and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.\u201d And it was so. <sup>16<\/sup> God made two great lights\u2014the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. <sup>17<\/sup> God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, <sup>18<\/sup> to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. <sup>19<\/sup> And there was evening, and there was morning\u2014the fourth day.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>20<\/sup> And God said, \u201cLet the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.\u201d <sup>21<\/sup> So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. <sup>22<\/sup> God blessed them and said, \u201cBe fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.\u201d <sup>23<\/sup> And there was evening, and there was morning\u2014the fifth day.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>24<\/sup> And God said, \u201cLet the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.\u201d And it was so. <sup>25<\/sup> God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. <br \/> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<sup>26<\/sup> Then God said, \u201cLet us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-26a\" title=\"See footnote a\">a<\/a>]<\/sup> and over all the creatures that move along the ground.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>27<\/sup> So God created mankind in his own image, <br \/> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0in the image of God he created them; <br \/> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0male and female he created them.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>28<\/sup> God blessed them and said to them, \u201cBe fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.\u201d <br \/> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<sup>29<\/sup> Then God said, \u201cI give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. <sup>30<\/sup> And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground\u2014everything that has the breath of life in it\u2014I give every green plant for food.\u201d And it was so. <br \/> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<sup>31<\/sup> God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning\u2014the sixth day.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Genesis 2<\/span><\/h4>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>1<\/sup> Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>2<\/sup> By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work. <sup>3<\/sup> Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Adam and Eve<\/span><\/h5>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<sup>4<\/sup> This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the LORD God made the earth and the heavens.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>5<\/sup> Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-36b\" title=\"See footnote b\">b<\/a>]<\/sup> and no plant had yet sprung up, for the LORD God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground, <sup>6<\/sup> but streams<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-37c\" title=\"See footnote c\">c<\/a>]<\/sup> came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground. <sup>7<\/sup> Then the LORD God formed a man<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-38d\" title=\"See footnote d\">d<\/a>]<\/sup> from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>8<\/sup> Now the LORD God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. <sup>9<\/sup> The LORD God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground\u2014trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>10<\/sup> A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters. <sup>11<\/sup> The name of the first is the Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold. <sup>12<\/sup> (The gold of that land is good; aromatic resin<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-43e\" title=\"See footnote e\">e<\/a>]<\/sup> and onyx are also there.) <sup>13<\/sup> The name of the second river is the Gihon; it winds through the entire land of Cush.<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-44f\" title=\"See footnote f\">f<\/a>]<\/sup> <sup>14<\/sup> The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Ashur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>15<\/sup> The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. <sup>16<\/sup> And the LORD God commanded the man, \u201cYou are free to eat from any tree in the garden; <sup>17<\/sup> but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>18<\/sup> The LORD God said, \u201cIt is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>19<\/sup> Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. <sup>20<\/sup> So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0But for Adam<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-51g\" title=\"See footnote g\">g<\/a>]<\/sup> no suitable helper was found. <sup>21<\/sup> So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man\u2019s ribs<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-52h\" title=\"See footnote h\">h<\/a>]<\/sup> and then closed up the place with flesh. <sup>22<\/sup> Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib<sup>[<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#fen-NIV-53i\" title=\"See footnote i\">i<\/a>]<\/sup> he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>23<\/sup> The man said,<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u201cThis is now bone of my bones <br \/> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0and flesh of my flesh; <br \/> she shall be called \u2018woman,\u2019 <br \/> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0for she was taken out of man.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<sup>24<\/sup> That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<ol type=\"a\" start=\"1\">\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-26\" title=\"Go to Genesis 1:26\">Genesis 1:26<\/a> Probable reading of the original Hebrew text (see Syriac); Masoretic Text <em>the earth<\/em><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-36\" title=\"Go to Genesis 2:5\">Genesis 2:5<\/a> Or <em>land<\/em>; also in verse 6<\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-37\" title=\"Go to Genesis 2:6\">Genesis 2:6<\/a> Or <em>mist<\/em><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-38\" title=\"Go to Genesis 2:7\">Genesis 2:7<\/a> The Hebrew for <em>man (adam)<\/em> sounds like and may be related to the Hebrew for <em>ground (adamah)<\/em>; it is also the name <em>Adam<\/em> (see verse 20).<\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-43\" title=\"Go to Genesis 2:12\">Genesis 2:12<\/a> Or <em>good;<\/em> <em>pearls<\/em><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-44\" title=\"Go to Genesis 2:13\">Genesis 2:13<\/a> Possibly southeast Mesopotamia<\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-51\" title=\"Go to Genesis 2:20\">Genesis 2:20<\/a> Or <em>the man<\/em><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-52\" title=\"Go to Genesis 2:21\">Genesis 2:21<\/a> Or <em>took part of the man\u2019s side<\/em><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=gen%201:1-2:24&amp;version=NIV#en-NIV-53\" title=\"Go to Genesis 2:22\">Genesis 2:22<\/a> Or <em>part<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<ul type=\"disc\">\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\">&lt;&lt;\u00a0<\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\">&lt;\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Darwinism<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Jump to: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#mw-head#mw-head\">navigation<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#p-search#p-search\">search<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span lang=\"EN\">This article is about concepts called Darwinism. For biological evolution, see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolution\" title=\"Evolution\">evolution<\/a>. For modern evolutionary theory, see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Modern_evolutionary_synthesis\" title=\"Modern evolutionary synthesis\">modern evolutionary synthesis<\/a>.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Charles Darwin in 1868<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Darwinism<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> is a set of movements and concepts related to ideas of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Transmutation_of_species\" title=\"Transmutation of species\">transmutation of species<\/a> or of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolution\" title=\"Evolution\">evolution<\/a>, including some ideas with no connection to the work of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Darwin\" title=\"Charles Darwin\">Charles Darwin<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-antidarwinian-0#cite_note-antidarwinian-0\">[1]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-EOflunks-1#cite_note-EOflunks-1\">[2]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-GalacticDarwinism-2#cite_note-GalacticDarwinism-2\">[3]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The meaning of &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; has changed over time, and varies depending on who is using the term.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-whatis-3#cite_note-whatis-3\">[4]<\/a><\/sup> In the United States, the term &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; is often used by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creationism\" title=\"Creationism\">creationists<\/a> as a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pejorative\" title=\"Pejorative\">pejorative<\/a> term in reference to beliefs such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Metaphysical_naturalism\" title=\"Metaphysical naturalism\">atheistic naturalism<\/a>, but in the United Kingdom the term has no negative connotations, being freely used as a short hand for the body of theory dealing with evolution, and in particular, evolution by natural selection.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-4#cite_note-4\">[5]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The term was coined by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_Henry_Huxley\" title=\"Thomas Henry Huxley\">Thomas Henry Huxley<\/a> in April 1860,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-westminster-5#cite_note-westminster-5\">[6]<\/a><\/sup> and was used to describe evolutionary concepts, including earlier concepts such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Malthusian\" title=\"Malthusian\">Malthusianism<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Herbert_Spencer\" title=\"Herbert Spencer\">Spencerism<\/a>. In the late 19th century it came to mean the concept that <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Natural_selection\" title=\"Natural selection\">natural selection<\/a> was the sole mechanism of evolution, in contrast to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lamarckism\" title=\"Lamarckism\">Lamarckism<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-whatis-3#cite_note-whatis-3\">[4]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Around 1900 Darwinism was eclipsed by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mendelism\" title=\"Mendelism\">Mendelism<\/a> until the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Modern_evolutionary_synthesis\" title=\"Modern evolutionary synthesis\">modern evolutionary synthesis<\/a> unified Darwin&#8217;s and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gregor_Mendel\" title=\"Gregor Mendel\">Gregor Mendel<\/a>&#8216;s ideas. As modern evolutionary theory has developed, the term has been associated at times with specific ideas.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-whatis-3#cite_note-whatis-3\">[4]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">While the term has remained in use amongst scientific authors, it has increasingly been argued that it is an inappropriate term for modern evolutionary theory.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-howto-6#cite_note-howto-6\">[7]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-7#cite_note-7\">[8]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-8#cite_note-8\">[9]<\/a><\/sup> For example, Darwin was unfamiliar with the work of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gregor_Mendel\" title=\"Gregor Mendel\">Gregor Mendel<\/a>,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-9#cite_note-9\">[10]<\/a><\/sup> and as a result had only a vague and inaccurate understanding of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Heredity\" title=\"Heredity\">heredity<\/a>. He naturally had no inkling of yet more recent developments and, like Mendel himself, knew nothing of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Genetic_drift\" title=\"Genetic drift\">genetic drift<\/a> for example.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-GeneticDrift-10#cite_note-GeneticDrift-10\">[11]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<table class=\"MsoNormalTable\" border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 0.75pt;\">\n<h2><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Contents<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#Conceptions_of_Darwinism#Conceptions_of_Darwinism\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Conceptions of Darwinism<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#19th-century_usage#19th-century_usage\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">2<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">19th-century usage<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#Other_uses#Other_uses\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">3<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Other uses<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#See_also#See_also\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">See also<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#Notes#Notes\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">5<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Notes<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#References#References\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">6<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">References<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#External_links#External_links\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">7<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">External links<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"editsection\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">[<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;action=edit&amp;section=1\" title=\"Edit section: Conceptions of Darwinism\">edit<\/a>]<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"mw-headline\">Conceptions of Darwinism<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/File:Editorial_cartoon_depicting_Charles_Darwin_as_an_ape_%281871%29.jpg\"><span style=\"text-decoration: none;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"file:\/\/\/C:\/Users\/Brian\/AppData\/Local\/Temp\/msohtmlclip1\/01\/clip_image001.jpg\" border=\"0\" width=\"220\" height=\"296\" \/><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">As &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; became widely accepted in the 1870s, caricatures of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Darwin\" title=\"Charles Darwin\">Charles Darwin<\/a> with an ape or <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Monkey\" title=\"Monkey\">monkey<\/a> body symbolised <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolution\" title=\"Evolution\">evolution<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-11#cite_note-11\">[12]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">While the term <em>Darwinism<\/em> had been used previously to refer to the work of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Erasmus_Darwin\" title=\"Erasmus Darwin\">Erasmus Darwin<\/a> in the late 18th century, the term as understood today was introduced when <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Darwin\" title=\"Charles Darwin\">Charles Darwin<\/a>&#8216;s 1859 book <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/On_the_Origin_of_Species\" title=\"On the Origin of Species\">On the Origin of Species<\/a><\/em> was reviewed by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_Henry_Huxley\" title=\"Thomas Henry Huxley\">Thomas Henry Huxley<\/a> in the April 1860 issue of the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Westminster_Review\" title=\"Westminster Review\">Westminster Review<\/a><\/em>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-urlThe_Huxley_File_.C2.A7_4_Darwins_Bulldog-12#cite_note-urlThe_Huxley_File_.C2.A7_4_Darwins_Bulldog-12\">[13]<\/a><\/sup> Having hailed the book as, &#8220;a veritable <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Joseph_Whitworth#Whitworth_rifle\" title=\"Joseph Whitworth\">Whitworth gun<\/a> in the armoury of liberalism&#8221; promoting <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Naturalism_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"Naturalism (philosophy)\">scientific naturalism<\/a> over <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theology\" title=\"Theology\">theology<\/a>, and praising the usefulness of Darwin&#8217;s ideas while expressing professional reservations about Darwin&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gradualism\" title=\"Gradualism\">gradualism<\/a> and doubting if it could be proved that <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Natural_selection\" title=\"Natural selection\">natural selection<\/a> could form new species,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-13#cite_note-13\">[14]<\/a><\/sup> Huxley compared Darwin&#8217;s achievement to that of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nicolaus_Copernicus\" title=\"Nicolaus Copernicus\">Copernicus<\/a> in explaining planetary motion:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">What if the orbit of Darwinism should be a little too circular? What if species should offer residual phenomena, here and there, not explicable by natural selection? Twenty years hence naturalists may be in a position to say whether this is, or is not, the case; but in either event they will owe the author of &#8220;The Origin of Species&#8221; an immense debt of gratitude&#8230;&#8230; And viewed as a whole, we do not believe that, since the publication of Von Baer&#8217;s &#8220;Researches on Development,&#8221; thirty years ago, any work has appeared calculated to exert so large an influence, not only on the future of Biology, but in extending the domination of Science over regions of thought into which she has, as yet, hardly penetrated.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-westminster-5#cite_note-westminster-5\">[6]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Another important evolutionariy theorist of the same period was <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peter_Kropotkin\" title=\"Peter Kropotkin\">Peter Kropotkin<\/a> who, in his book <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mutual_Aid:_A_Factor_of_Evolution\" title=\"Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution\">Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution<\/a><\/em>, advocated a conception of Darwinism counter to that of Huxley. His conception was centred around what he saw as the widespread use of cooperation as a survival mechanism in human societies and animals. He used <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Biology\" title=\"Biology\">biological<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sociology\" title=\"Sociology\">sociological<\/a> arguments in an attempt to show that the main factor in facilitating evolution is cooperation between individuals in free-associated societies and groups. This was in order to counteract the conception of fierce <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Competition_%28biology%29\" title=\"Competition (biology)\">competition<\/a> as the core of evolution, which provided a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rationalization_%28making_excuses%29\" title=\"Rationalization (making excuses)\">rationalisation<\/a> for the dominant political, economic and social theories of the time; and the prevalent interpretations of Darwinism, such as those by Huxley, who is targeted as an opponent by Kropotkin. Kropotkin&#8217;s conception of Darwinism could be summed up by the following quote:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">In the animal world we have seen that the vast majority of species live in societies, and that they find in association the best arms for the struggle for life: understood, of course, in its wide Darwinian sense\u00a0\u2013 not as a struggle for the sheer means of existence, but as a struggle against all natural conditions unfavourable to the species. The animal species, in which individual struggle has been reduced to its narrowest limits, and the practice of mutual aid has attained the greatest development, are invariably the most numerous, the most prosperous, and the most open to further progress. The mutual protection which is obtained in this case, the possibility of attaining old age and of accumulating experience, the higher intellectual development, and the further growth of sociable habits, secure the maintenance of the species, its extension, and its further progressive evolution. The unsociable species, on the contrary, are doomed to decay.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\" align=\"right\"><span lang=\"EN\">\u2014 <cite>Peter Kropotkin, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902), Conclusion.<\/cite><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"editsection\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">[<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;action=edit&amp;section=2\" title=\"Edit section: 19th-century usage\">edit<\/a>]<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"mw-headline\">19th-century usage<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">&#8220;Darwinism&#8221; soon came to stand for an entire range of evolutionary (and often revolutionary) philosophies about both biology and society. One of the more prominent approaches, summed in the 1864 phrase &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Survival_of_the_fittest\" title=\"Survival of the fittest\">survival of the fittest<\/a>&#8221; by the philosopher <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Herbert_Spencer\" title=\"Herbert Spencer\">Herbert Spencer<\/a>, later became emblematic of Darwinism even though Spencer&#8217;s own understanding of evolution (as expressed in 1857) was more similar to that of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jean-Baptiste_Lamarck\" title=\"Jean-Baptiste Lamarck\">Jean-Baptiste Lamarck<\/a> than to that of Darwin, and predated the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Publication_of_Darwin%27s_theory\" title=\"Publication of Darwin's theory\">publication of Darwin&#8217;s theory<\/a> in 1859. What is now called &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Social_Darwinism\" title=\"Social Darwinism\">Social Darwinism<\/a>&#8221; was, in its day, synonymous with &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; \u2014 the application of Darwinian principles of &#8220;struggle&#8221; to society, usually in support of anti-<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philanthropy\" title=\"Philanthropy\">philanthropic<\/a> political agenda. Another interpretation, one notably favoured by Darwin&#8217;s half-cousin <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Francis_Galton\" title=\"Francis Galton\">Francis Galton<\/a>, was that &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; implied that because natural selection was apparently no longer working on &#8220;civilized&#8221; people, it was possible for &#8220;inferior&#8221; strains of people (who would normally be filtered out of the gene pool) to overwhelm the &#8220;superior&#8221; strains, and voluntary corrective measures would be desirable \u2014 the foundation of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eugenics\" title=\"Eugenics\">eugenics<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<table class=\"MsoNormalTable\" style=\"width: 33%; margin-left: 9pt; border-collapse: collapse;\" width=\"33%\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 7.2pt; padding: 2pt 1pt 1pt;\" valign=\"top\" width=\"10\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 6pt 0cm;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #b2b7f2;\">\u201c<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 0cm 5pt;\" valign=\"top\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 6pt 0cm;\">And so a Darwinian &#8216;left&#8217; and a Darwinian &#8216;right&#8217; were in place before most people had grasped the Darwinian middle, which was where the maker was.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 7.2pt; padding: 2pt 1pt 1pt;\" valign=\"bottom\" width=\"10\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 6pt 0cm; text-align: right;\" align=\"right\"><strong><span style=\"color: #b2b7f2;\">\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 5pt 0.75pt 0.75pt;\" colspan=\"3\">\n<p style=\"text-align: right; line-height: 12pt;\" align=\"right\">\u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Adam_Gopnik\" title=\"Adam Gopnik\">Adam Gopnik<\/a>, <em>Angels and Ages: A Short Book About Darwin, Lincoln, and Modern Life<\/em><sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-14#cite_note-14\">[15]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">In Darwin&#8217;s day there was no rigid definition of the term &#8220;Darwinism&#8221;, and it was used by opponents and proponents of Darwin&#8217;s biological theory alike to mean whatever they wanted it to in a larger context. The ideas had international influence, and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ernst_Haeckel\" title=\"Ernst Haeckel\">Ernst Haeckel<\/a> developed what was known as <em>Darwinismus<\/em> in Germany, although, like Spencer&#8217;s &#8220;evolution&#8221;, Haeckel&#8217;s &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; had only a rough resemblance to the theory of Charles Darwin, and was not centred on natural selection at all.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">While reaction against Darwin&#8217;s ideas is nowadays often<sup>[<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Citation_needed\" title=\"Wikipedia:Citation needed\">citation needed<\/a><\/em>]<\/sup> thought<sup>[<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words\" title=\"Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words\">by whom?<\/a><\/em>]<\/sup> to have been widespread immediately, in 1886 <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Alfred_Russel_Wallace\" title=\"Alfred Russel Wallace\">Alfred Russel Wallace<\/a> went on a lecture tour across the United States, starting in New York and going via Boston, Washington, Kansas, Iowa and Nebraska to California, lecturing on what he called &#8220;Darwinism&#8221; without any problems.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-15#cite_note-15\">[16]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"editsection\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">[<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;action=edit&amp;section=3\" title=\"Edit section: Other uses\">edit<\/a>]<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"mw-headline\">Other uses<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The term <em>Darwinism<\/em> is often used in the United States by promoters of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creationism\" title=\"Creationism\">creationism<\/a>, notably by leading members of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design_movement\" title=\"Intelligent design movement\">intelligent design movement<\/a>, as an epithet to attack <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolution\" title=\"Evolution\">evolution<\/a> as though it were an ideology (an &#8220;ism&#8221;) of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophical_naturalism\" title=\"Philosophical naturalism\">philosophical naturalism<\/a>, or <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Atheism\" title=\"Atheism\">atheism<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-genie-16#cite_note-genie-16\">[17]<\/a><\/sup> For example, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Phillip_E._Johnson\" title=\"Phillip E. Johnson\">Phillip E. Johnson<\/a> makes this accusation of atheism with reference to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Hodge#Darwinism\" title=\"Charles Hodge\">Charles Hodge<\/a>&#8216;s book <em>What Is Darwinism?<\/em>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-17#cite_note-17\">[18]<\/a><\/sup> However, unlike Johnson, Hodge confined the term to exclude those like <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Asa_Gray\" title=\"Asa Gray\">Asa Gray<\/a> who combined Christian faith with support for Darwin&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Natural_selection\" title=\"Natural selection\">natural selection<\/a> theory, before answering the question posed in the book&#8217;s title by concluding: &#8220;It is Atheism.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-18#cite_note-18\">[19]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-19#cite_note-19\">[20]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-20#cite_note-20\">[21]<\/a><\/sup> Creationists use the term <em>Darwinism<\/em>, often pejoratively, to imply that the theory has been held as true only by Darwin and a core group of his followers, whom they cast as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dogma\" title=\"Dogma\">dogmatic<\/a> and inflexible in their <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Belief\" title=\"Belief\">belief<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-morrissullivan-21#cite_note-morrissullivan-21\">[22]<\/a><\/sup> Casting evolution as a doctrine or belief, as well as a pseudo-religious ideology like Marxism,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-Joseph_Esfandiar_Hannon_Bozorgmehr-22#cite_note-Joseph_Esfandiar_Hannon_Bozorgmehr-22\">[23]<\/a><\/sup> bolsters religiously motivated political arguments to mandate <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teach_the_Controversy\" title=\"Teach the Controversy\">equal time<\/a> for the teaching of creationism in public schools.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">However, <em>Darwinism<\/em> is also used neutrally within the scientific community to distinguish <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Modern_evolutionary_synthesis\" title=\"Modern evolutionary synthesis\">modern evolutionary theories<\/a>, sometimes called &#8220;NeoDarwinism&#8221;, from those first proposed by Darwin. <em>Darwinism<\/em> also is used neutrally by historians to differentiate his theory from other evolutionary theories current around the same period. For example, <em>Darwinism<\/em> may be used to refer to Darwin&#8217;s proposed mechanism of natural selection, in comparison to more recent mechanisms such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Genetic_drift\" title=\"Genetic drift\">genetic drift<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gene_flow\" title=\"Gene flow\">gene flow<\/a>. It may also refer specifically to the role of Charles Darwin as opposed to others in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/History_of_evolutionary_thought\" title=\"History of evolutionary thought\">history of evolutionary thought<\/a> \u2014 particularly contrasting Darwin&#8217;s results with those of earlier theories such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lamarckism\" title=\"Lamarckism\">Lamarckism<\/a> or later ones such as the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Modern_synthesis\" title=\"Modern synthesis\">modern synthesis<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">In the United Kingdom the term retains its positive sense as a reference to natural selection, and for example <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Richard_Dawkins\" title=\"Richard Dawkins\">Richard Dawkins<\/a> wrote in his collection of essays <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/A_Devil%27s_Chaplain\" title=\"A Devil's Chaplain\">A Devil&#8217;s Chaplain<\/a><\/em>, published in 2003, that as a scientist he is a Darwinist.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_note-23#cite_note-23\">[24]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism_%28book%29\" title=\"Darwinism (book)\">Darwinism (book)<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Modern_evolutionary_synthesis\" title=\"Modern evolutionary synthesis\">Modern evolutionary synthesis<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neo-Darwinism\" title=\"Neo-Darwinism\">Neo-Darwinism<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neural_Darwinism\" title=\"Neural Darwinism\">Neural Darwinism<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Social_Darwinism\" title=\"Social Darwinism\">Social Darwinism<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwin_Awards\" title=\"Darwin Awards\">Darwin Awards<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pangenesis\" title=\"Pangenesis\">Pangenesis<\/a> &#8211; Charles Darwin&#8217;s hypothetical mechanism for heredity <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Universal_Darwinism\" title=\"Universal Darwinism\">Universal Darwinism<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"editsection\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">[<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;action=edit&amp;section=5\" title=\"Edit section: Notes\">edit<\/a>]<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"mw-headline\">Notes<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>1.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-antidarwinian_0-0#cite_ref-antidarwinian_0-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">John Wilkins (1998). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/anti-darwin.html\">&#8220;How to be Anti-Darwinian&#8221;<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/TalkOrigins_Archive\" title=\"TalkOrigins Archive\">TalkOrigins Archive<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/anti-darwin.html\">http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/anti-darwin.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 19 June 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>2.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-EOflunks_1-0#cite_ref-EOflunks_1-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.expelledexposed.com\/index.php\/contest\/on-what-evolution-explains\">&#8220;Expelled Exposed: Why Expelled Flunks\u00a0\u00bb \u2026on what evolution explains&#8221;<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.expelledexposed.com\/index.php\/contest\/on-what-evolution-explains\">http:\/\/www.expelledexposed.com\/index.php\/contest\/on-what-evolution-explains<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 22 December 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>3.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-GalacticDarwinism_2-0#cite_ref-GalacticDarwinism_2-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/European_Southern_Observatory\" title=\"European Southern Observatory\">based on an European Southern Observatory release<\/a> (9 December 2006). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.astrobio.net\/news\/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2169&amp;theme=Printer\">&#8220;Galactic Darwinism\u00a0:: Astrobiology Magazine &#8211; earth science &#8211; evolution distribution Origin of life universe &#8211; life beyond\u00a0:: Astrobiology is study of earth science evolution distribution Origin of life in universe terrestrial&#8221;<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.astrobio.net\/news\/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2169&amp;theme=Printer\">http:\/\/www.astrobio.net\/news\/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2169&amp;theme=Printer<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 22 December 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>4.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-whatis_3-0#cite_ref-whatis_3-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-whatis_3-1#cite_ref-whatis_3-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-whatis_3-2#cite_ref-whatis_3-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citationweb\">Joel Hanes. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/darwinism.html\">&#8220;What is Darwinism?&#8221;<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/TalkOrigins_Archive\" title=\"TalkOrigins Archive\">TalkOrigins Archive<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/darwinism.html\">http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/darwinism.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 19 June 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>5.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-4#cite_ref-4\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationjournal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eugenie_Scott\" title=\"Eugenie Scott\">Scott, Eugenie C.<\/a>; <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Glenn_Branch\" title=\"Glenn Branch\">Branch, Glenn<\/a> (16 January 2009). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/n47h34357743w4p0\/?p=e3b030036a4d442a8ce393291fe0688f&amp;pi=9\">&#8220;Don\u2019t Call it &#8220;Darwinism&#8221;&#8221;<\/a>. <em>Evolution: Education and Outreach<\/em> (New York: Springer) <strong>2<\/strong> (1): 90. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_object_identifier\" title=\"Digital object identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007%2Fs12052-008-0111-2\">10.1007\/s12052-008-0111-2<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Serial_Number\" title=\"International Standard Serial Number\">ISSN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/issn\/1936-6434\">1936-6434<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/n47h34357743w4p0\/?p=e3b030036a4d442a8ce393291fe0688f&amp;pi=9\">http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/n47h34357743w4p0\/?p=e3b030036a4d442a8ce393291fe0688f&amp;pi=9<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 17 November 2009<\/span><span class=\"citationjournal\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>6.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-westminster_5-0#cite_ref-westminster_5-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-westminster_5-1#cite_ref-westminster_5-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_Henry_Huxley\" title=\"Thomas Henry Huxley\">Huxley, T.H.<\/a> (April 1860). <a href=\"http:\/\/darwin-online.org.uk\/content\/frameset?viewtype=side&amp;itemID=A32&amp;pageseq=29\">&#8220;ART. VIII.- Darwin on the origin of Species&#8221;<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Westminster_Review\" title=\"Westminster Review\">Westminster Review<\/a>. pp. 541\u201370<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/darwin-online.org.uk\/content\/frameset?viewtype=side&amp;itemID=A32&amp;pageseq=29\">http:\/\/darwin-online.org.uk\/content\/frameset?viewtype=side&amp;itemID=A32&amp;pageseq=29<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 19 June 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">. &#8220;What if the orbit of Darwinism should be a little too circular?&#8221;<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>7.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-howto_6-0#cite_ref-howto_6-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">John Wilkins (1998). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/anti-darwin.html\">&#8220;How to be Anti-Darwinian&#8221;<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/TalkOrigins_Archive\" title=\"TalkOrigins Archive\">TalkOrigins Archive<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/anti-darwin.html\">http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/anti-darwin.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 27 June 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>8.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-7#cite_ref-7\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">Ruse, Michael (2003). <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=SHWaeRiRD-cC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=%22michael+ruse%22+darwinism\"><em>Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose?<\/em><\/a>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp.\u00a0293. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0674016319\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/0674016319\">0674016319<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=SHWaeRiRD-cC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=%22michael+ruse%22+darwinism\">http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=SHWaeRiRD-cC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=%22michael+ruse%22+darwinism<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 18 July 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationbook\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>9.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-8#cite_ref-8\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">Olivia Judson (15 July 2008). <a href=\"http:\/\/judson.blogs.nytimes.com\/2008\/07\/15\/lets-get-rid-of-darwinism\/\">&#8220;Let\u2019s Get Rid of Darwinism&#8221;<\/a>. <em>New York Times<\/em><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/judson.blogs.nytimes.com\/2008\/07\/15\/lets-get-rid-of-darwinism\/\">http:\/\/judson.blogs.nytimes.com\/2008\/07\/15\/lets-get-rid-of-darwinism\/<\/a><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>10.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-9#cite_ref-9\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationjournal\">Sclater, Andrew (June 2006). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/w112307246x77t37\/\">&#8220;The extent of Charles Darwin\u2019s knowledge of Mendel&#8221;<\/a>. <em>Journal of Biosciences<\/em> (Bangalore, India: Springer India \/ Indian Academy of Sciences) <strong>31<\/strong> (2): 191\u2013193. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_object_identifier\" title=\"Digital object identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007%2FBF02703910\">10.1007\/BF02703910<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PubMed_Identifier\" title=\"PubMed Identifier\">PMID<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16809850\">16809850<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/w112307246x77t37\/\">http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/w112307246x77t37\/<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 3 January 2009<\/span><span class=\"citationjournal\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>11.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-GeneticDrift_10-0#cite_ref-GeneticDrift_10-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">Laurence Moran (1993). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/genetic-drift.html\">&#8220;Random Genetic Drift&#8221;<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/TalkOrigins_Archive\" title=\"TalkOrigins Archive\">TalkOrigins Archive<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/genetic-drift.html\">http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/genetic-drift.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 27 June 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>12.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-11#cite_ref-11\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#CITEREFBrowne2002#CITEREFBrowne2002\">Browne 2002<\/a>, pp.\u00a0376\u2013379 <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>13.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-urlThe_Huxley_File_.C2.A7_4_Darwins_Bulldog_12-0#cite_ref-urlThe_Huxley_File_.C2.A7_4_Darwins_Bulldog_12-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/aleph0.clarku.edu\/huxley\/guide4.html\">&#8220;The Huxley File \u00a7 4 Darwin&#8217;s Bulldog&#8221;<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/aleph0.clarku.edu\/huxley\/guide4.html\">http:\/\/aleph0.clarku.edu\/huxley\/guide4.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 29 June 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>14.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-13#cite_ref-13\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#CITEREFBrowne2002#CITEREFBrowne2002\">Browne 2002<\/a>, pp.\u00a0105\u2013106 <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>15.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-14#cite_ref-14\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#CITEREFGopnik2009#CITEREFGopnik2009\">Gopnik 2009<\/a>, p.\u00a0152. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>16.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-15#cite_ref-15\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/speakingoffaith.publicradio.org\/programs\/darwin\/transcript.shtml\">&#8220;Evolution and Wonder &#8211; Understanding Charles Darwin &#8211; Speaking of Faith from American Public Media&#8221;<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/speakingoffaith.publicradio.org\/programs\/darwin\/transcript.shtml\">http:\/\/speakingoffaith.publicradio.org\/programs\/darwin\/transcript.shtml<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 27 July 2007<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>17.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-genie_16-0#cite_ref-genie_16-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eugenie_Scott\" title=\"Eugenie Scott\">Scott, Eugenie C.<\/a> (2008). <a href=\"http:\/\/biology.ucf.edu\/%7Eclp\/Courses\/seminar\/papers\/07-Scott-scientists_confront-cs_lite.pdf\">&#8220;Creation Science Lite: &#8220;Intelligent Design&#8221; as the New Anti-Evolutionism&#8221;<\/a>. In Godfrey, Laurie R.; Petto, Andrew J.. <em>Scientists Confront Creationism: Intelligent Design and Beyond<\/em>. New York: W. W. Norton. pp.\u00a072. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0-393-33073-7\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/0-393-33073-7\">0-393-33073-7<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/biology.ucf.edu\/%7Eclp\/Courses\/seminar\/papers\/07-Scott-scientists_confront-cs_lite.pdf\">http:\/\/biology.ucf.edu\/~clp\/Courses\/seminar\/papers\/07-Scott-scientists_confront-cs_lite.pdf<\/a><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>18.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-17#cite_ref-17\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">Johnson, Phillip E.. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/johnson\/wid.htm\">&#8220;What is Darwinism?&#8221;<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/johnson\/wid.htm\">http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/johnson\/wid.htm<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 4 January 2007<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>19.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-18#cite_ref-18\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">Matthew, Ropp. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theropps.com\/papers\/Winter1997\/CharlesHodge.htm\">&#8220;Charles Hodge and His Objection to Darwinism&#8221;<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theropps.com\/papers\/Winter1997\/CharlesHodge.htm\">http:\/\/www.theropps.com\/papers\/Winter1997\/CharlesHodge.htm<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 4 January 2007<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>20.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-19#cite_ref-19\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">Hodge, Charles. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/19192\/19192-8.txt\">&#8220;What is Darwinism?&#8221;<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/19192\/19192-8.txt\">http:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/19192\/19192-8.txt<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 4 January 2007<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>21.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-20#cite_ref-20\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">Hodge, Charles (1874). <em>What is Darwinism?<\/em>. Scribner, Armstrong, and Company. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Online_Computer_Library_Center\" title=\"Online Computer Library Center\">OCLC<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/oclc\/11489956\">11489956<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>22.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-morrissullivan_21-0#cite_ref-morrissullivan_21-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">Sullivan, M (2005). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.impactpress.com\/articles\/spring05\/sullivanspring05.html\">&#8220;From the Beagle to the School Board: God Goes Back to School&#8221;<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Impact_Press\" title=\"Impact Press\">Impact Press<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.impactpress.com\/articles\/spring05\/sullivanspring05.html\">http:\/\/www.impactpress.com\/articles\/spring05\/sullivanspring05.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 18 September 2008<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>23.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-Joseph_Esfandiar_Hannon_Bozorgmehr_22-0#cite_ref-Joseph_Esfandiar_Hannon_Bozorgmehr_22-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.docstoc.com\/docs\/20835072\/Darwinism-should-be-allowed-to-collapse-and-end-up-on-the-ash-heap-of-history\">&#8220;Darwinism should be allowed to collapse and end up on the ash heap of history&#8221;<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.docstoc.com\/docs\/20835072\/Darwinism-should-be-allowed-to-collapse-and-end-up-on-the-ash-heap-of-history\">http:\/\/www.docstoc.com\/docs\/20835072\/Darwinism-should-be-allowed-to-collapse-and-end-up-on-the-ash-heap-of-history<\/a><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>24.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwinism#cite_ref-23#cite_ref-23\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Sheahen, Laura. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/story\/136\/story_13688_1.html\">Religion: For Dummies<\/a>. BeliefNet.com, interview about 2003 book. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"editsection\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">[<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;action=edit&amp;section=6\" title=\"Edit section: References\">edit<\/a>]<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"mw-headline\">References<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationbook\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Janet_Browne\" title=\"Janet Browne\">Browne, E. Janet<\/a> (2002). <em>Charles Darwin: Vol. 2 The Power of Place<\/em>. London: Jonathan Cape. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0712668373\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/0712668373\">0712668373<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\" lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationbook\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Adam_Gopnik\" title=\"Adam Gopnik\">Gopnik, Adam<\/a> (2009). <em>Angels and Ages: A Short Book About Darwin, Lincoln, and Modern Life<\/em>. London: Quercus. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/9781847249296\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/9781847249296\">9781847249296<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\" lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"editsection\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">[<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;action=edit&amp;section=7\" title=\"Edit section: External links\">edit<\/a>]<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"mw-headline\">External links<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">This page was last modified on 11 October 2011 at 08:54.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">Text is available under the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License\">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License<\/a>; additional terms may apply. See <a href=\"http:\/\/wikimediafoundation.org\/wiki\/Terms_of_use\">Terms of use<\/a> for details.<br \/> Wikipedia\u00ae is a registered trademark of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wikimediafoundation.org\/\">Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.<\/a>, a non-profit organization.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Contact_us\">Contact us<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/wikimediafoundation.org\/wiki\/Privacy_policy\" title=\"wikimedia:Privacy policy\">Privacy policy<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:About\" title=\"Wikipedia:About\">About Wikipedia<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer\" title=\"Wikipedia:General disclaimer\">Disclaimers<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;useformat=mobile\">Mobile view<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Jump to: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#mw-head#mw-head\">navigation<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#p-search#p-search\">search<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span lang=\"EN\">This article is about intelligent design as promulgated by the Discovery Institute. For other uses, see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design_%28disambiguation%29\" title=\"Intelligent design (disambiguation)\">Intelligent design (disambiguation)<\/a>.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span lang=\"EN\">For the philosophical &#8220;argument from design&#8221;, see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teleological_argument\" title=\"Teleological argument\">Teleological argument<\/a>.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> (<strong>ID<\/strong>) is the proposition that &#8220;certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Natural_selection\" title=\"Natural selection\">natural selection<\/a>.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-DI-topquestions-0#cite_note-DI-topquestions-0\">[1]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-1#cite_note-1\">[2]<\/a><\/sup> It is a form of creationism and a contemporary adaptation of the traditional teleological argument for the existence of God, presented by its advocates as &#8220;an evidence-based scientific theory about life&#8217;s origins&#8221; rather than &#8220;a religious-based idea&#8221;. It avoids specifying that the hypothesized <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_designer\" title=\"Intelligent designer\">intelligent designer<\/a> is God.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-2#cite_note-2\">[3]<\/a><\/sup> Its leading proponents are associated with the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>, a politically conservative <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Think_tank\" title=\"Think tank\">think tank<\/a>,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-DI_engine-3#cite_note-DI_engine-3\">[n 1]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-4#cite_note-4\">[4]<\/a><\/sup> and believe the designer to be the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christian\" title=\"Christian\">Christian<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/God\" title=\"God\">God<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-KvD26-5#cite_note-KvD26-5\">[n 2]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-CitizenLink-6#cite_note-CitizenLink-6\">[n 3]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">ID seeks to redefine science in a fundamental way that would invoke <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Supernatural\" title=\"Supernatural\">supernatural<\/a> explanations, a viewpoint known as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theistic_science\" title=\"Theistic science\">theistic science<\/a>. It puts forward a number of arguments, the most prominent of which are <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Irreducible_complexity\" title=\"Irreducible complexity\">irreducible complexity<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Specified_complexity\" title=\"Specified complexity\">specified complexity<\/a>, in support of the existence of a designer.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-discovery-7#cite_note-discovery-7\">[5]<\/a><\/sup> The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_community\" title=\"Scientific community\">scientific community<\/a> rejects the extension of science to include supernatural explanations in favor of continued acceptance of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Methodological_naturalism\" title=\"Methodological naturalism\">methodological naturalism<\/a>,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-8#cite_note-8\">[n 4]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-teachernet-9#cite_note-teachernet-9\">[n 5]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-10#cite_note-10\">[6]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-11#cite_note-11\">[7]<\/a><\/sup> and has rejected both irreducible complexity and specified complexity for a wide range of conceptual and factual flaws.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-reducibly_complex_mousetrap-12#cite_note-reducibly_complex_mousetrap-12\">[8]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-cbs.dtu.dk-13#cite_note-cbs.dtu.dk-13\">[9]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Kitzmiller_v_p._64-14#cite_note-Kitzmiller_v_p._64-14\">[10]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-talkorigins.org-15#cite_note-talkorigins.org-15\">[11]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-16#cite_note-16\">[12]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-math.jmu.edu-17#cite_note-math.jmu.edu-17\">[13]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design was developed by a group of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States\" title=\"United States\">American<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creationism\" title=\"Creationism\">creationists<\/a> who revised their argument in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creation%E2%80%93evolution_controversy\" title=\"Creation\u2013evolution controversy\">creation\u2013evolution controversy<\/a> to circumvent court rulings such as the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_Supreme_Court\" title=\"United States Supreme Court\">United States Supreme Court<\/a> <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Edwards_v._Aguillard\" title=\"Edwards v. Aguillard\">Edwards v. Aguillard<\/a><\/em> ruling, which barred the teaching of &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creation_science\" title=\"Creation science\">creation science<\/a>&#8221; in public schools as breaching the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Separation_of_church_and_state_in_the_United_States\" title=\"Separation of church and state in the United States\">separation of church and state<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitz21-18#cite_note-kitz21-18\">[14]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitzruling-IDandGod-19#cite_note-kitzruling-IDandGod-19\">[n 6]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-ForrestMayPaper-20#cite_note-ForrestMayPaper-20\">[15]<\/a><\/sup> The first significant published use of intelligent design was in <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Of_Pandas_and_People\" title=\"Of Pandas and People\">Of Pandas and People<\/a><\/em>, a 1989 textbook intended for high-school biology classes.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitz31-21#cite_note-kitz31-21\">[16]<\/a><\/sup> From the mid-1990s, intelligent design proponents were supported by the Discovery Institute, which, together with its <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Science_and_Culture\" title=\"Center for Science and Culture\">Center for Science and Culture<\/a>, planned and funded the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design_movement\" title=\"Intelligent design movement\">intelligent design movement<\/a>&#8220;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-22#cite_note-22\">[17]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-DI_engine-3#cite_note-DI_engine-3\">[n 1]<\/a><\/sup> They advocated inclusion of intelligent design in public school curricula, leading to the 2005 <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/em> trial, where <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_district_court\" title=\"United States district court\">U.S. District Judge<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_E._Jones_III\" title=\"John E. Jones III\">John E. Jones III<\/a> ruled that intelligent design is not science, that it &#8220;cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents&#8221;, and that the school district&#8217;s promotion of it therefore violated the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Establishment_Clause_of_the_First_Amendment\" title=\"Establishment Clause of the First Amendment\">Establishment Clause<\/a> of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution\" title=\"First Amendment to the United States Constitution\">First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-23#cite_note-23\">[18]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<table class=\"MsoNormalTable\" border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 0.75pt;\">\n<h2><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Contents<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#History#History\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">History<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Origin_of_the_concept#Origin_of_the_concept\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">1.1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Origin of the concept<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Origin_of_the_term#Origin_of_the_term\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">1.2<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Origin of the term<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 57.6pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Of_Pandas_and_People#Of_Pandas_and_People\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">1.2.1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Of Pandas and People<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Concepts#Concepts\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">2<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Concepts<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Irreducible_complexity#Irreducible_complexity\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">2.1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Irreducible complexity<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Specified_complexity#Specified_complexity\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">2.2<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Specified complexity<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Fine-tuned_Universe#Fine-tuned_Universe\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">2.3<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Fine-tuned Universe<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Intelligent_designer#Intelligent_designer\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">2.4<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Intelligent designer<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Movement#Movement\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">3<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Movement<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Religion_and_leading_proponents#Religion_and_leading_proponents\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">3.1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Religion and leading proponents<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Reaction_from_other_creationist_groups#Reaction_from_other_creationist_groups\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">3.2<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Reaction from other creationist groups<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Polls#Polls\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">3.3<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Polls<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Film#Film\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">3.4<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Film<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Creating_and_teaching_the_controversy#Creating_and_teaching_the_controversy\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Creating and teaching the controversy<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Neo-creationism#Neo-creationism\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4.1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Neo-creationism<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Theistic_science#Theistic_science\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4.2<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Theistic science<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Inter-faith_outreach#Inter-faith_outreach\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4.3<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Inter-faith outreach<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Defining_science#Defining_science\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4.4<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Defining science<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Peer_review#Peer_review\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4.5<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Peer review<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Intelligence_as_an_observable_quality#Intelligence_as_an_observable_quality\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4.6<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Intelligence as an observable quality<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Arguments_from_ignorance#Arguments_from_ignorance\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4.7<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Arguments from ignorance<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#God_of_the_gaps#God_of_the_gaps\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">4.8<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">God of the gaps<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Kitzmiller_trial#Kitzmiller_trial\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">5<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Kitzmiller trial<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Reaction#Reaction\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">5.1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Reaction<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Status_outside_the_United_States#Status_outside_the_United_States\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">6<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Status outside the United States<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Europe#Europe\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">6.1<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Europe<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Relation_to_Islam#Relation_to_Islam\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">6.2<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Relation to Islam<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Courier New';\"><span>o<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Australia#Australia\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">6.3<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Australia<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#See_also#See_also\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">7<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">See also<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Notes#Notes\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">8<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Notes<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#References#References\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">9<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">References<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#Further_reading#Further_reading\"><span class=\"tocnumber2\">10<\/span> <span class=\"toctext\">Further reading<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">History<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Origin of the concept<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">See also: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_poor_design\" title=\"Argument from poor design\">Argument from poor design<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teleological_argument\" title=\"Teleological argument\">Teleological argument<\/a>,\u00a0and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Watchmaker_analogy\" title=\"Watchmaker analogy\">Watchmaker analogy<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The concept of intelligent design, the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teleological_argument\" title=\"Teleological argument\">teleological argument<\/a>, is one of three basic religious arguments for the existence of God which have been advanced for centuries (the others being the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ontological_argument\" title=\"Ontological argument\">ontological argument<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cosmological_argument\" title=\"Cosmological argument\">cosmological argument<\/a>). In the 13th century <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_Aquinas\" title=\"Thomas Aquinas\">Thomas Aquinas<\/a> argued that natural things act to achieve the best result, and as they cannot do this without intelligence, an intelligent being must exist, setting the goal and providing direction, and this being is God. The version formulated in 1802 by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Paley\" title=\"William Paley\">William Paley<\/a> used the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Watchmaker_analogy\" title=\"Watchmaker analogy\">watchmaker analogy<\/a> to argue that complexity and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Adaptation\" title=\"Adaptation\">adaptation<\/a> in nature demonstrated God&#8217;s benevolent and perfect design, for the good of humans. Paley&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Natural_theology\" title=\"Natural theology\">natural theology<\/a> strongly influenced scientists of the time, who took for granted the assumption that God had designed nature and were open to a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Deism\" title=\"Deism\">deistic<\/a> interpretation that this design was implemented by laws. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Darwin\" title=\"Charles Darwin\">Charles Darwin<\/a> struggled with the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Problem_of_evil\" title=\"Problem of evil\">problem of evil<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_poor_design\" title=\"Argument from poor design\">poor design in nature<\/a>, and though his <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Natural_selection\" title=\"Natural selection\">natural selection<\/a> explained adaptation without the need for a designer, he was still inclined to think that everything resulted from designed laws. The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theistic_evolution\" title=\"Theistic evolution\">theistic evolution<\/a> of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Asa_Gray\" title=\"Asa Gray\">Asa Gray<\/a> contributed to wide acceptance of evolution,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-24#cite_note-24\">[19]<\/a><\/sup> and by 1910 it was not a topic of major religious controversy in America.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-PM_09-25#cite_note-PM_09-25\">[20]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">In the 1920s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fundamentalist_Christianity\" title=\"Fundamentalist Christianity\">Fundamentalist Christianity<\/a> took up opposition to evolution, and effectively suspended teaching of evolution in U.S. public schools. In the 1960s, after evolution was reintroduced into the curriculum, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Young_Earth_creationism\" title=\"Young Earth creationism\">Young Earth creationists<\/a> promoted <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creation_Science\" title=\"Creation Science\">Creation Science<\/a> as &#8220;an alternative scientific explanation of the world in which we live&#8221;, which frequently invoked the design argument to explain complexity in nature. These explanations prefigured the intelligent arguments of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Irreducible_complexity\" title=\"Irreducible complexity\">irreducible complexity<\/a>, even featuring the bacterial <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flagellum\" title=\"Flagellum\">flagellum<\/a>. Attempts to introduce this in schools led to court rulings that creation science is religious in nature, and thus cannot be taught in public school science classrooms.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-SM_07-26#cite_note-SM_07-26\">[21]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design also has Paley&#8217;s argument from design at its centre, and shares other arguments with creation science but differs in avoiding overt literal Biblical references such as the age of the Earth and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Noah%27s_Flood\" title=\"Noah's Flood\">Noah&#8217;s Flood<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-SM_07-26#cite_note-SM_07-26\">[21]<\/a><\/sup> Unlike Paley&#8217;s openness to deistic design through laws, the point of intelligent design is to establish repeated miraculous interventions in the history of life. This raises theological difficulties; for those who believe that God&#8217;s design must be perfect and should not need such changes, the claim to be scientific implies that science can test religion, and the problem of evil of a lack of miraculous intervention to reduce suffering.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-PM_09-25#cite_note-PM_09-25\">[20]<\/a><\/sup> Intelligent design proponents avoid the problem of poor design in nature by insisting that we have simply failed to understand the perfection of the design, or by proposing that designers do not necessarily produce the best design they can, and may have unknowable motives for their actions.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Pennock_245-27#cite_note-Pennock_245-27\">[22]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Philosopher <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Barbara_Forrest\" title=\"Barbara Forrest\">Barbara Forrest<\/a> writes that the intelligent design movement began in 1984 with the publication by Jon A. Buell&#8217;s the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Foundation_for_Thought_and_Ethics\" title=\"Foundation for Thought and Ethics\">Foundation for Thought and Ethics<\/a> of <em>The Mystery of Life&#8217;s Origin<\/em> by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_B._Thaxton\" title=\"Charles B. Thaxton\">Charles B. Thaxton<\/a>, a chemist and creationist. Thaxton held a conference in 1988, &#8220;Sources of Information Content in DNA,&#8221; which attracted creationists such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stephen_C._Meyer\" title=\"Stephen C. Meyer\">Stephen C. Meyer<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-28#cite_note-28\">[23]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">In March 1986, a review by Meyer used information theory to suggest that messages transmitted by DNA in the cell show &#8220;specified complexity&#8221; specified by intelligence, and must have originated with an intelligent agent.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-meyermolo-29#cite_note-meyermolo-29\">[24]<\/a><\/sup> In November of that year Thaxton described his reasoning as a more sophisticated form of Paley&#8217;s argument from design.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-30#cite_note-30\">[25]<\/a><\/sup> At the <em>Sources of Information Content in DNA<\/em> conference in 1988 he said that his intelligent cause view was compatible with both <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Metaphysical_naturalism\" title=\"Metaphysical naturalism\">metaphysical naturalism<\/a> and supernaturalism,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-picshb-31#cite_note-picshb-31\">[26]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design avoids identifying or naming the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_designer\" title=\"Intelligent designer\">intelligent designer<\/a>\u2014it merely states that one (or more) must exist\u2014but leaders of the movement have said the designer is the Christian God.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-KvD26-5#cite_note-KvD26-5\">[n 2]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-CitizenLink-6#cite_note-CitizenLink-6\">[n 3]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-dembski_logos-32#cite_note-dembski_logos-32\">[27]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-wedge2-33#cite_note-wedge2-33\">[n 7]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-34#cite_note-34\">[n 8]<\/a><\/sup> Whether this lack of specificity about the designer&#8217;s identity in public discussions is a genuine feature of the concept, or just a posture taken to avoid alienating those who would separate religion from the teaching of science, has been a matter of great debate between supporters and critics of intelligent design. The <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/em> court ruling held the latter to be the case.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Origin of the term<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Of_Pandas_and_People\" title=\"Of Pandas and People\">Of Pandas and People<\/a><\/span><\/em><span lang=\"EN\"> was the first modern intelligent design book. <em>Rethinking Schools<\/em> magazine characterizes it as &#8220;pseudo-science,&#8221; rejected by most scientists.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-RethinkingSchools-35#cite_note-RethinkingSchools-35\">[28]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">See also: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Timeline_of_intelligent_design\" title=\"Timeline of intelligent design\">Timeline of intelligent design<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The phrase &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; can be found in an 1847 issue of <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_American\" title=\"Scientific American\">Scientific American<\/a><\/em>,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-36#cite_note-36\">[29]<\/a><\/sup> in an 1850 book by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Patrick_Edward_Dove\" title=\"Patrick Edward Dove\">Patrick Edward Dove<\/a>,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-37#cite_note-37\">[30]<\/a><\/sup> and in an 1861 letter from <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Darwin\" title=\"Charles Darwin\">Charles Darwin<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-38#cite_note-38\">[31]<\/a><\/sup> The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Paley\" title=\"William Paley\">Paleyite<\/a> botanist <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/George_James_Allman\" title=\"George James Allman\">George James Allman<\/a> used the phrase in an address to the 1873 annual meeting of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/British_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Science\" title=\"British Association for the Advancement of Science\">British Association for the Advancement of Science<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">&#8220;No physical hypothesis founded on any indisputable fact has yet explained the origin of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Abiogenesis\" title=\"Abiogenesis\">primordial protoplasm<\/a>, and, above all, of its marvellous properties, which render evolution possible\u2014in heredity and in adaptability, for these properties are the cause and not the effect of evolution. For the cause of this cause we have sought in vain among the physical forces which surround us, until we are at last compelled to rest upon an independent volition, a far-seeing intelligent design.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-39#cite_note-39\">[32]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The phrase can be found again in <em>Humanism<\/em>, a 1903 book by one of the founders of classical <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pragmatism\" title=\"Pragmatism\">pragmatism<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ferdinand_Canning_Scott_Schiller\" title=\"Ferdinand Canning Scott Schiller\">F.C.S. Schiller<\/a>: &#8220;It will not be possible to rule out the supposition that the process of evolution may be guided by an intelligent design&#8221;. A derivative of the phrase appears in the Macmillan <em>Encyclopedia of Philosophy<\/em> (1967) in the article titled, &#8220;Teleological argument for the existence of God&#8221;: &#8220;Stated most succinctly, the argument runs: The world exhibits <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teleological\" title=\"Teleological\">teleological<\/a> order (design, adaptation). Therefore, it was produced by an intelligent designer&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-40#cite_note-40\">[33]<\/a><\/sup> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_Nozick\" title=\"Robert Nozick\">Robert Nozick<\/a> (1974) wrote: &#8220;Consider now complicated patterns which one would have thought would arise only through intelligent design&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-41#cite_note-41\">[34]<\/a><\/sup> The phrases &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; and &#8220;intelligently designed&#8221; were used in a 1979 philosophy book <em>Chance or Design?<\/em> by James Horigan<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-42#cite_note-42\">[35]<\/a><\/sup> and the phrase &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; was used in a 1982 speech by Sir <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fred_Hoyle\" title=\"Fred Hoyle\">Fred Hoyle<\/a> in his promotion of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Panspermia\" title=\"Panspermia\">panspermia<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-43#cite_note-43\">[36]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Use of the terms &#8220;creationism&#8221; versus &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; in sequential drafts of the book <em>Of Pandas and People<\/em><sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Matzke-44#cite_note-Matzke-44\">[37]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The modern use of the words &#8220;intelligent design&#8221;, as a term intended to describe a field of inquiry, began after the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States\" title=\"Supreme Court of the United States\">Supreme Court of the United States<\/a>, in the case of <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Edwards_v._Aguillard\" title=\"Edwards v. Aguillard\">Edwards v. Aguillard<\/a><\/em> (1987), ruled that creationism is unconstitutional in public school science curricula. A Discovery Institute report says that <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Thaxton\" title=\"Charles Thaxton\">Charles Thaxton<\/a>, editor of <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Of_Pandas_and_People\" title=\"Of Pandas and People\">Of Pandas and People<\/a><\/em>, had picked the phrase up from a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/NASA\" title=\"NASA\">NASA<\/a> scientist, and thought &#8220;That&#8217;s just what I need, it&#8217;s a good engineering term&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-45#cite_note-45\">[38]<\/a><\/sup> In drafts of the book over one hundred uses of the root word &#8220;creation&#8221;, such as &#8220;creationism&#8221; and &#8220;creation science&#8221;, were changed, almost without exception, to &#8220;intelligent design&#8221;,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitz31-21#cite_note-kitz31-21\">[16]<\/a><\/sup> while &#8220;creationists&#8221; was changed to &#8220;design proponents&#8221; or, in one instance, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cdesign_proponentsists\" title=\"Cdesign proponentsists\">cdesign proponentsists<\/a>&#8220;. [<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sic\" title=\"Sic\">sic<\/a><\/em>]<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Matzke-44#cite_note-Matzke-44\">[37]<\/a><\/sup> In June 1988 Thaxton held a conference titled &#8220;Sources of Information Content in DNA&#8221; in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tacoma,_Washington\" title=\"Tacoma, Washington\">Tacoma<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Washington_%28U.S._state%29\" title=\"Washington (U.S. state)\">Washington<\/a>,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-picshb-31#cite_note-picshb-31\">[26]<\/a><\/sup> and in December decided to use the label &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; for his new creationist movement.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-46#cite_note-46\">[39]<\/a><\/sup> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stephen_C._Meyer\" title=\"Stephen C. Meyer\">Stephen C. Meyer<\/a> was at the conference, and later recalled that &#8220;the term came up&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-47#cite_note-47\">[40]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h4><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">Of Pandas and People<\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><em><span lang=\"EN\">Of Pandas and People<\/span><\/em><span lang=\"EN\"> was published in 1989, and was the first book to make frequent use of the phrases &#8220;intelligent design,&#8221; &#8220;design proponents,&#8221; and &#8220;design theory&#8221;, thus representing the beginning of the modern &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; movement.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-pandafounds-48#cite_note-pandafounds-48\">[41]<\/a><\/sup> &#8220;Intelligent design&#8221; was the most prominent of around fifteen new terms it introduced as a new lexicon of creationist terminology to oppose evolution without using religious language.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-49#cite_note-49\">[42]<\/a><\/sup> It was the first place where the phrase &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; appeared in its present use, as stated both by its publisher Jon Buell,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-SM_07-26#cite_note-SM_07-26\">[21]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-50#cite_note-50\">[43]<\/a><\/sup> and by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_A._Dembski\" title=\"William A. Dembski\">William A. Dembski<\/a> in his expert witness report.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-51#cite_note-51\">[44]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a> has criticized the book for presenting all of the basic arguments of intelligent design proponents and being actively promoted for use in public schools before any research had been done to support these arguments.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-pandafounds-48#cite_note-pandafounds-48\">[41]<\/a><\/sup> Although presented as a scientific textbook, Philosopher of science <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Ruse\" title=\"Michael Ruse\">Michael Ruse<\/a> considers the contents &#8220;worthless and dishonest&#8221;. An <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/American_Civil_Liberties_Union\" title=\"American Civil Liberties Union\">ACLU<\/a> lawyer described it as a political tool aimed at students who did not &#8220;know science or understand the controversy over evolution and creationism.&#8221; One of the authors of the science framework used by California Schools, Kevin Padian, condemned it for its &#8220;sub-text&#8221;, &#8220;Intolerance for honest science&#8221; and &#8220;incompetence&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-RethinkingSchools-35#cite_note-RethinkingSchools-35\">[28]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">Concepts<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Irreducible complexity<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Irreducible_complexity\" title=\"Irreducible complexity\">Irreducible complexity<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">The concept of irreducible complexity was popularised by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Behe\" title=\"Michael Behe\">Michael Behe<\/a>, in his 1996 book, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwin%27s_Black_Box\" title=\"Darwin's Black Box\">Darwin&#8217;s Black Box<\/a><\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The term &#8220;irreducible complexity&#8221; was introduced by biochemist <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Behe\" title=\"Michael Behe\">Michael Behe<\/a> in his 1996 book <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwin%27s_Black_Box\" title=\"Darwin's Black Box\">Darwin&#8217;s Black Box<\/a><\/em>, though he had already described the concept in his contributions to the 1993 revised edition of <em>Of Pandas and People<\/em>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-pandafounds-48#cite_note-pandafounds-48\">[41]<\/a><\/sup> Behe defines it as &#8220;a single system which is composed of several well-matched interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-52#cite_note-52\">[45]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Behe uses the analogy of a mousetrap to illustrate this concept. A mousetrap consists of several interacting pieces\u2014the base, the catch, the spring and the hammer\u2014all of which must be in place for the mousetrap to work. Removal of any one piece destroys the function of the mousetrap. Intelligent design advocates assert that natural selection could not create irreducibly complex systems, because the selectable function is present only when all parts are assembled. Behe argued that irreducibly complex biological mechanisms include the bacterial flagellum of <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/E._coli\" title=\"E. coli\">E. coli<\/a><\/em>, the blood clotting cascade, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cilia\" title=\"Cilia\">cilia<\/a>, and the adaptive <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Immune_system\" title=\"Immune system\">immune system<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-53#cite_note-53\">[46]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-54#cite_note-54\">[47]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Critics point out that the irreducible complexity argument assumes that the necessary parts of a system have always been necessary and therefore could not have been added sequentially.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-reducibly_complex_mousetrap-12#cite_note-reducibly_complex_mousetrap-12\">[8]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-cbs.dtu.dk-13#cite_note-cbs.dtu.dk-13\">[9]<\/a><\/sup> They argue that something that is at first merely advantageous can later become necessary as other components change. Furthermore, they argue, evolution often proceeds by altering preexisting parts or by removing them from a system, rather than by adding them. This is sometimes called the &#8220;scaffolding objection&#8221; by an analogy with scaffolding, which can support an &#8220;irreducibly complex&#8221; building until it is complete and able to stand on its own.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-55#cite_note-55\">[n 9]<\/a><\/sup> Behe has acknowledged using &#8220;sloppy prose&#8221;, and that his &#8220;argument against Darwinism does not add up to a logical proof&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-56#cite_note-56\">[n 10]<\/a><\/sup> Irreducible complexity has remained a popular argument among advocates of intelligent design; in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Dover trial<\/a>, the court held that &#8220;Professor Behe&#8217;s claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer-reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Kitzmiller_v_p._64-14#cite_note-Kitzmiller_v_p._64-14\">[10]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Specified complexity<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Specified_complexity\" title=\"Specified complexity\">Specified complexity<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">In 1986 <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Thaxton\" title=\"Charles Thaxton\">Charles Thaxton<\/a>, a physical chemist and creationist, used the term &#8220;specified complexity&#8221; from <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Information_theory\" title=\"Information theory\">information theory<\/a> when claiming that messages transmitted by DNA in the cell were specified by intelligence, and must have originated with an intelligent agent.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-meyermolo-29#cite_note-meyermolo-29\">[24]<\/a><\/sup> The intelligent design concept of &#8220;specified complexity&#8221; was developed in the 1990s by mathematician, philosopher, and theologian <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Dembski\" title=\"William Dembski\">William Dembski<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-57#cite_note-57\">[48]<\/a><\/sup> Dembski, Research Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Center for Cultural Engagement at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, states that when something exhibits specified complexity (i.e., is both complex and &#8220;specified&#8221;, simultaneously), one can infer that it was produced by an intelligent cause (i.e., that it was designed) rather than being the result of natural processes. He provides the following examples: &#8220;A single letter of the alphabet is specified without being complex. A long sentence of random letters is complex without being specified. A <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Shakespearean\" title=\"Shakespearean\">Shakespearean<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sonnet\" title=\"Sonnet\">sonnet<\/a> is both complex and specified&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-58#cite_note-58\">[49]<\/a><\/sup> He states that details of living things can be similarly characterized, especially the &#8220;patterns&#8221; of molecular sequences in functional biological molecules such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/DNA\" title=\"DNA\">DNA<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Dembski\" title=\"William Dembski\">William Dembski<\/a> proposed the concept of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Specified_complexity\" title=\"Specified complexity\">specified complexity<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-59#cite_note-59\">[50]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Dembski defines <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Complex_specified_information\" title=\"Complex specified information\">complex specified information<\/a> (CSI) as anything with a less than 1 in 10<sup>150<\/sup> chance of occurring by (natural) chance. Critics say that this renders the argument a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tautology_%28rhetoric%29\" title=\"Tautology (rhetoric)\">tautology<\/a>: complex specified information cannot occur naturally because Dembski has defined it thus, so the real question becomes whether or not CSI actually exists in nature.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-60#cite_note-60\">[51]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-61#cite_note-61\">[n 11]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Wein-62#cite_note-Wein-62\">[52]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The conceptual soundness of Dembski&#8217;s specified complexity\/CSI argument has been widely discredited by the scientific and mathematical communities.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-talkorigins.org-15#cite_note-talkorigins.org-15\">[11]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-math.jmu.edu-17#cite_note-math.jmu.edu-17\">[13]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-63#cite_note-63\">[53]<\/a><\/sup> Specified complexity has yet to be shown to have wide applications in other fields, as Dembski asserts. John Wilkins and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wesley_R._Elsberry\" title=\"Wesley R. Elsberry\">Wesley Elsberry<\/a> characterize Dembski&#8217;s &#8220;explanatory filter&#8221; as <em>eliminative<\/em>, because it eliminates explanations sequentially: first regularity, then chance, finally defaulting to design. They argue that this procedure is flawed as a model for scientific inference because the asymmetric way it treats the different possible explanations renders it prone to making false conclusions.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-64#cite_note-64\">[54]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Richard_Dawkins\" title=\"Richard Dawkins\">Richard Dawkins<\/a>, another critic of intelligent design, argues in <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_God_Delusion\" title=\"The God Delusion\">The God Delusion<\/a><\/em> that allowing for an intelligent designer to account for unlikely complexity only postpones the problem, as such a designer would need to be at least as complex.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-65#cite_note-65\">[55]<\/a><\/sup> Other scientists have argued that evolution through selection is better able to explain the observed complexity, as is evident from the use of selective evolution to design certain electronic, aeronautic and automotive systems that are considered problems too complex for human &#8220;intelligent designers&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-66#cite_note-66\">[56]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Fine-tuned Universe<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fine-tuned_Universe\" title=\"Fine-tuned Universe\">Fine-tuned Universe<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design proponents have also occasionally appealed to broader teleological arguments outside of biology, most notably an argument based on the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fine-tuned_universe\" title=\"Fine-tuned universe\">fine-tuning of universal constants<\/a> that make matter and life possible and which are argued not to be solely attributable to chance. These include the values of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fundamental_physical_constants\" title=\"Fundamental physical constants\">fundamental physical constants<\/a>, the relative strength of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nuclear_force\" title=\"Nuclear force\">nuclear forces<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Electromagnetism\" title=\"Electromagnetism\">electromagnetism<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gravity\" title=\"Gravity\">gravity<\/a> between <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fundamental_particles\" title=\"Fundamental particles\">fundamental particles<\/a>, as well as the ratios of masses of such particles. Intelligent design proponent and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Science_and_Culture\" title=\"Center for Science and Culture\">Center for Science and Culture<\/a> fellow <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Guillermo_Gonzalez_%28astronomer%29\" title=\"Guillermo Gonzalez (astronomer)\">Guillermo Gonzalez<\/a> argues that if any of these values were even slightly different, the universe would be dramatically different, making it impossible for many <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Chemical_elements\" title=\"Chemical elements\">chemical elements<\/a> and features of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Universe\" title=\"Universe\">Universe<\/a>, such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Galaxies\" title=\"Galaxies\">galaxies<\/a>, to form.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-67#cite_note-67\">[57]<\/a><\/sup> Thus, proponents argue, an intelligent designer of life was needed to ensure that the requisite features were present to achieve that particular outcome.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Scientists have generally responded that this argument cannot be tested and is therefore not science but metaphysics. Some scientists argue that even when taken as mere speculation, these arguments are poorly supported by existing evidence.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-68#cite_note-68\">[58]<\/a><\/sup> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Victor_J._Stenger\" title=\"Victor J. Stenger\">Victor J. Stenger<\/a> and other critics say both intelligent design and the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Weak_anthropic_principle\" title=\"Weak anthropic principle\">weak form<\/a> of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Anthropic_principle\" title=\"Anthropic principle\">anthropic principle<\/a> are essentially a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tautology_%28logic%29\" title=\"Tautology (logic)\">tautology<\/a>; in his view, these arguments amount to the claim that life is able to exist because the Universe is able to support life.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-69#cite_note-69\">[59]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-70#cite_note-70\">[60]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-71#cite_note-71\">[61]<\/a><\/sup> The claim of the improbability of a life-supporting universe has also been criticized as an <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_by_lack_of_imagination\" title=\"Argument by lack of imagination\">argument by lack of imagination<\/a> for assuming no other forms of life are possible. Life as we know it might not exist if things were different, but a different sort of life might exist in its place. A number of critics also suggest that many of the stated variables appear to be interconnected and that calculations made by mathematicians and physicists suggest that the emergence of a universe similar to ours is quite probable.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-72#cite_note-72\">[62]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Intelligent designer<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_designer\" title=\"Intelligent designer\">Intelligent designer<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design arguments are formulated in secular terms and intentionally avoid identifying the intelligent agent (or agents) they posit. Although they do not state that God is the designer, the designer is often implicitly hypothesized to have intervened in a way that only a god could intervene. Dembski, in <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Design_Inference\" title=\"The Design Inference\">The Design Inference<\/a><\/em>, speculates that an alien culture could fulfill these requirements. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Of_Pandas_and_People\" title=\"Of Pandas and People\">Of Pandas and People<\/a><\/em> proposes that <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/SETI\" title=\"SETI\">SETI<\/a> illustrates an appeal to intelligent design in science. In 2000, philosopher of science <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_T._Pennock\" title=\"Robert T. Pennock\">Robert T. Pennock<\/a> suggested the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ra%C3%ABlian_beliefs_and_practices\" title=\"Ra\u00eblian beliefs and practices\">Ra\u00eblian<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/UFO\" title=\"UFO\">UFO<\/a> religion as a real-life example of an extraterrestrial intelligent designer view that &#8220;make[s] many of the same bad arguments against evolutionary theory as creationists&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-73#cite_note-73\">[63]<\/a><\/sup> The authoritative description of intelligent design,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-74#cite_note-74\">[n 12]<\/a><\/sup> however, explicitly states that the <em>Universe<\/em> displays features of having been designed. Acknowledging the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paradox\" title=\"Paradox\">paradox<\/a>, Dembski concludes that &#8220;no intelligent agent who is strictly physical could have presided over the origin of the universe or the origin of life&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-75#cite_note-75\">[64]<\/a><\/sup> The leading proponents have made statements to their supporters that they believe the designer to be the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/God_in_Christianity\" title=\"God in Christianity\">Christian God<\/a>, to the exclusion of all other religions.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-KvD26-5#cite_note-KvD26-5\">[n 2]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-CitizenLink-6#cite_note-CitizenLink-6\">[n 3]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-dembski_logos-32#cite_note-dembski_logos-32\">[27]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Beyond the debate over whether intelligent design is scientific, a number of critics argue that existing evidence makes the design hypothesis appear unlikely, irrespective of its status in the world of science. For example, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jerry_Coyne\" title=\"Jerry Coyne\">Jerry Coyne<\/a> asks why a designer would &#8220;give us a pathway for making <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Vitamin_C\" title=\"Vitamin C\">vitamin C<\/a>, but then destroy it by disabling one of its enzymes&#8221; (see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pseudogene\" title=\"Pseudogene\">pseudogene<\/a>) and why he or she would not &#8220;stock oceanic islands with reptiles, mammals, amphibians, and freshwater fish, despite the suitability of such islands for these species&#8221;. Coyne also points to the fact that &#8220;the flora and fauna on those islands resemble that of the nearest mainland, even when the environments are very different&#8221; as evidence that species were not placed there by a designer.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-CoyneTNR-76#cite_note-CoyneTNR-76\">[65]<\/a><\/sup> Previously, in <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Darwin%27s_Black_Box\" title=\"Darwin's Black Box\">Darwin&#8217;s Black Box<\/a><\/em>, Behe had argued that we are simply incapable of understanding the designer&#8217;s motives, so such questions cannot be answered definitively. Odd designs could, for example, &#8220;have been placed there by the designer &#8230; for artistic reasons, to show off, for some as-yet undetectable practical purpose, or for some unguessable reason&#8221;. Coyne responds that in light of the evidence, &#8220;either life resulted not from intelligent design, but from evolution; or the intelligent designer is a cosmic prankster who designed everything to make it look as though it had evolved&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-CoyneTNR-76#cite_note-CoyneTNR-76\">[65]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Some intelligent design proponents such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paul_Nelson_%28creationist%29\" title=\"Paul Nelson (creationist)\">Paul Nelson<\/a> avoid the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_poor_design\" title=\"Argument from poor design\">problem of poor design in nature<\/a> by insisting that we have simply failed to understand the perfection of the design. Behe cites Paley as his inspiration, but he differs from Paley&#8217;s expectation of a perfect Creation and proposes that designers do not necessarily produce the best design they can. Behe suggests that, like a parent not wanting to spoil a child with extravagant toys, the designer can have multiple motives for not giving priority to excellence in engineering. He says that &#8220;the argument for imperfection critically depends on a psychoanalysis of the unidentified designer. Yet the reasons that a designer would or would not do anything are virtually impossible to know unless the designer tells you specifically what those reasons are.&#8221; This reliance on inexplicable motives of the designer makes intelligent design scientifically untestable. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Phillip_E._Johnson\" title=\"Phillip E. Johnson\">Phillip E. Johnson<\/a> puts forward a core definition that the designer creates for a purpose, giving the example that in his view <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/AIDS\" title=\"AIDS\">AIDS<\/a> was created to punish immorality and was not caused by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/HIV\" title=\"HIV\">HIV<\/a>, but such motives cannot be tested by scientific methods.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Pennock_245-27#cite_note-Pennock_245-27\">[22]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Asserting the need for a designer of complexity also raises the question &#8220;What designed the designer?&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-77#cite_note-77\">[66]<\/a><\/sup> Intelligent design proponents say that the question is irrelevant to or outside the scope of intelligent design.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-78#cite_note-78\">[n 13]<\/a><\/sup> Richard Wein counters that the unanswered questions an explanation creates &#8220;must be balanced against the improvements in our understanding which the explanation provides. Invoking an unexplained being to explain the origin of other beings (ourselves) is little more than <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Begging_the_question\" title=\"Begging the question\">question-begging<\/a>. The new question raised by the explanation is as problematic as the question which the explanation purports to answer&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Wein-62#cite_note-Wein-62\">[52]<\/a><\/sup> Richard Dawkins sees the assertion that the designer does not need to be explained, not as a contribution to knowledge, but as a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thought-terminating_clich%C3%A9\" title=\"Thought-terminating clich\u00e9\">thought-terminating clich\u00e9<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Rosenhouse-79#cite_note-Rosenhouse-79\">[67]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-80#cite_note-80\">[68]<\/a><\/sup> In the absence of observable, measurable evidence, the very question &#8220;What designed the designer?&#8221; leads to an <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Turtles_all_the_way_down\" title=\"Turtles all the way down\">infinite regression<\/a> from which intelligent design proponents can only escape by resorting to religious creationism or logical contradiction.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-81#cite_note-81\">[69]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">Movement<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design_movement\" title=\"Intelligent design movement\">Intelligent design movement<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>&#8216;s Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture used banners based on &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Creation_of_Adam\" title=\"The Creation of Adam\">The Creation of Adam<\/a>&#8221; from the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sistine_Chapel_ceiling\" title=\"Sistine Chapel ceiling\">Sistine Chapel<\/a>. Later it used a less religious image, then was renamed the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Science_and_Culture\" title=\"Center for Science and Culture\">Center for Science and Culture<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-82#cite_note-82\">[70]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The intelligent design movement is a direct outgrowth of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creationism\" title=\"Creationism\">creationism<\/a> of the 1980s.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-ForrestMayPaper-20#cite_note-ForrestMayPaper-20\">[15]<\/a><\/sup> The scientific and academic communities, along with a U.S. federal court, view intelligent design as either a form of creationism or as a direct descendant that is closely intertwined with traditional creationism;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-harvard-83#cite_note-harvard-83\">[71]<\/a><\/sup> <sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-aaas-84#cite_note-aaas-84\">[n 14]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-85#cite_note-85\">[72]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-86#cite_note-86\">[73]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-87#cite_note-87\">[74]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-88#cite_note-88\">[75]<\/a><\/sup> and several authors explicitly refer to it as &#8220;intelligent design creationism&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-ForrestMayPaper-20#cite_note-ForrestMayPaper-20\">[15]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-89#cite_note-89\">[76]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-90#cite_note-90\">[n 15]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-91#cite_note-91\">[77]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The movement is headquartered in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Science_and_Culture\" title=\"Center for Science and Culture\">Center for Science and Culture<\/a> (CSC), established in 1996 as the creationist wing of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a> to promote a religious agenda<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-wedge_doc-92#cite_note-wedge_doc-92\">[n 16]<\/a><\/sup> calling for broad social, academic and political changes. The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute_intelligent_design_campaigns\" title=\"Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns\">Discovery Institute&#8217;s intelligent design campaigns<\/a> have been staged primarily in the United States, although efforts have been made in other countries to promote intelligent design. Leaders of the movement say intelligent design exposes the limitations of scientific orthodoxy and of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Secular\" title=\"Secular\">secular<\/a> philosophy of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Naturalism_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"Naturalism (philosophy)\">naturalism<\/a>. Intelligent design proponents allege that science should not be limited to naturalism and should not demand the adoption of a naturalistic <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_science\" title=\"Philosophy of science\">philosophy<\/a> that dismisses out-of-hand any explanation that includes a supernatural cause. The overall goal of the movement is to &#8220;defeat [the] <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Materialism\" title=\"Materialism\">materialist<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/World_view\" title=\"World view\">world view<\/a>&#8221; represented by the theory of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolution\" title=\"Evolution\">evolution<\/a> in favor of &#8220;a science consonant with <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christian\" title=\"Christian\">Christian<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theism\" title=\"Theism\">theistic<\/a> convictions&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-wedge_doc-92#cite_note-wedge_doc-92\">[n 16]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Phillip_E._Johnson\" title=\"Phillip E. Johnson\">Phillip E. Johnson<\/a> stated that the goal of intelligent design is to cast <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creationism\" title=\"Creationism\">creationism<\/a> as a scientific concept.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-wedge2-33#cite_note-wedge2-33\">[n 7]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-PJC-93#cite_note-PJC-93\">[n 17]<\/a><\/sup> All leading intelligent design proponents are fellows or staff of the Discovery Institute and its <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Science_and_Culture\" title=\"Center for Science and Culture\">Center for Science and Culture<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-94#cite_note-94\">[78]<\/a><\/sup> Nearly all intelligent design concepts and the associated movement are the products of the Discovery Institute, which guides the movement and follows its <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wedge_strategy\" title=\"Wedge strategy\">wedge strategy<\/a> while conducting its <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teach_the_Controversy\" title=\"Teach the Controversy\">Teach the Controversy<\/a> campaign and their <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute_intelligent_design_campaigns\" title=\"Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns\">other related programs<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Leading intelligent design proponents have made conflicting statements regarding intelligent design. In statements directed at the general public, they say intelligent design is not religious; when addressing conservative Christian supporters, they state that intelligent design has its foundation in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bible\" title=\"Bible\">Bible<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-PJC-93#cite_note-PJC-93\">[n 17]<\/a><\/sup> Recognizing the need for support, the institute affirms its Christian, evangelistic orientation: &#8220;Alongside a focus on influential opinion-makers, we also seek to build up a popular base of support among our natural constituency, namely, Christians. We will do this primarily through apologetics seminars. We intend these to encourage and equip believers with new scientific evidences that support the faith, as well as to &#8216;popularize&#8217; our ideas in the broader culture.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-wedge_doc-92#cite_note-wedge_doc-92\">[n 16]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Barbara_Forrest\" title=\"Barbara Forrest\">Barbara Forrest<\/a>, an expert who has written extensively on the movement, describes this as being due to the Discovery Institute&#8217;s obfuscating its agenda as a matter of policy. She has written that the movement&#8217;s &#8220;activities betray an aggressive, systematic agenda for promoting not only intelligent design creationism, but the religious world-view that undergirds it&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-95#cite_note-95\">[79]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Religion and leading proponents<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Although arguments for intelligent design are formulated in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Secular\" title=\"Secular\">secular<\/a> terms and intentionally avoid positing the identity of the designer,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-IDstatementOnCreator-96#cite_note-IDstatementOnCreator-96\">[n 18]<\/a><\/sup> the majority of principal intelligent design advocates are publicly religious <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christianity\" title=\"Christianity\">Christians<\/a> who have stated that in their view the designer proposed in intelligent design is <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/God_in_Christianity\" title=\"God in Christianity\">the Christian conception of God<\/a>. Stuart Burgess, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Phillip_E._Johnson\" title=\"Phillip E. Johnson\">Phillip E. Johnson<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Dembski\" title=\"William Dembski\">William Dembski<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stephen_C._Meyer\" title=\"Stephen C. Meyer\">Stephen C. Meyer<\/a> are <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evangelicalism\" title=\"Evangelicalism\">evangelical Protestants<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Behe\" title=\"Michael Behe\">Michael Behe<\/a> is a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Roman_Catholic\" title=\"Roman Catholic\">Roman Catholic<\/a>, while <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jonathan_Wells_%28intelligent_design_advocate%29\" title=\"Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate)\">Jonathan Wells<\/a> is a member of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Unification_Church\" title=\"Unification Church\">Unification Church<\/a>. Phillip E. Johnson has stated that cultivating ambiguity by employing secular language in arguments that are carefully crafted to avoid overtones of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theistic_evolution\" title=\"Theistic evolution\">theistic creationism<\/a> is a necessary first step for ultimately reintroducing the Christian concept of God as the designer. Johnson explicitly calls for intelligent design proponents to obfuscate their religious motivations so as to avoid having intelligent design identified &#8220;as just another way of packaging the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evangelical_Christian\" title=\"Evangelical Christian\">Christian evangelical<\/a> message&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-97#cite_note-97\">[n 19]<\/a><\/sup> Johnson emphasizes that &#8220;the first thing that has to be done is to get the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bible\" title=\"Bible\">Bible<\/a> out of the discussion&#8221;; &#8220;after we have separated <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_materialism\" title=\"Scientific materialism\">materialist<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Prejudice\" title=\"Prejudice\">prejudice<\/a> from scientific fact [&#8230;] only then can &#8216;biblical issues&#8217; be discussed&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Johnson-Touchstone-98#cite_note-Johnson-Touchstone-98\">[n 20]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wedge_strategy\" title=\"Wedge strategy\">strategy<\/a> of deliberately disguising the religious intent of intelligent design has been described by William Dembski in <em>The Design Inference<\/em>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Design_Inference-99#cite_note-Design_Inference-99\">[80]<\/a><\/sup> In this work Dembski lists a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/God\" title=\"God\">god<\/a> or an &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Extraterrestrial_life\" title=\"Extraterrestrial life\">alien life force<\/a>&#8221; as two possible options for the identity of the designer; however, in his book <em>Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology,<\/em> Dembski states that &#8220;Christ is indispensable to any scientific theory, even if its practitioners don&#8217;t have a clue about him. The pragmatics of a scientific theory can, to be sure, be pursued without recourse to Christ. But the conceptual soundness of the theory can in the end only be located in Christ.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-100#cite_note-100\">[81]<\/a><\/sup> Dembski also stated, &#8220;ID is part of God&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/General_revelation\" title=\"General revelation\">general revelation<\/a> [&#8230;] Not only does intelligent design rid us of this ideology (<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Materialism\" title=\"Materialism\">materialism<\/a>), which suffocates the human spirit, but, in my personal experience, I&#8217;ve found that it opens the path for people to come to Christ&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-101#cite_note-101\">[82]<\/a><\/sup> Both Johnson and Dembski cite the Bible&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gospel_of_John\" title=\"Gospel of John\">Gospel of John<\/a> as the foundation of intelligent design.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-dembski_logos-32#cite_note-dembski_logos-32\">[27]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-PJC-93#cite_note-PJC-93\">[n 17]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Barbara Forrest contends such statements reveal that leading proponents see intelligent design as essentially religious in nature, not merely a scientific concept that has implications with which their personal religious beliefs happen to coincide.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-102#cite_note-102\">[n 21]<\/a><\/sup> She writes that the leading proponents of intelligent design are closely allied with the ultra-conservative <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christian_Reconstructionism\" title=\"Christian Reconstructionism\">Christian Reconstructionism<\/a> movement. She lists connections of (current and former) Discovery Institute Fellows Phillip Johnson, Charles Thaxton, Michael Behe, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Richard_Weikart\" title=\"Richard Weikart\">Richard Weikart<\/a>, Jonathan Wells and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Francis_Beckwith\" title=\"Francis Beckwith\">Francis Beckwith<\/a> to leading Christian Reconstructionist organizations, and the extent of the funding provided the Institute by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Howard_Ahmanson_Jr.\" title=\"Howard Ahmanson Jr.\">Howard Ahmanson Jr.<\/a>, a leading figure in the Reconstructionist movement.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-103#cite_note-103\">[83]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Reaction from other creationist groups<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Not all creationist organizations have embraced the intelligent design movement. According to Thomas Dixon, &#8220;Religious leaders have come out against ID too. An open letter affirming the compatibility of Christian faith and the teaching of evolution, first produced in response to controversies in Wisconsin in 2004, has now been signed by over ten thousand clergy from different Christian denominations across America. In 2006, the director of the Vatican Observatory, the Jesuit astronomer George Coyne, condemned ID as a kind of &#8216;crude creationism&#8217; which reduced God to a mere engineer.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-104#cite_note-104\">[84]<\/a><\/sup> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hugh_Ross_%28creationist%29\" title=\"Hugh Ross (creationist)\">Hugh Ross<\/a> of Reasons to Believe, a proponent of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Old_Earth_creationism\" title=\"Old Earth creationism\">Old Earth creationism<\/a>, believes that the efforts of intelligent design proponents to divorce the concept from Biblical Christianity make its hypothesis too vague. In 2002 he wrote: &#8220;Winning the argument for design without identifying the designer yields, at best, a sketchy origins model. Such a model makes little if any positive impact on the community of scientists and other scholars\u2026 The time is right for a direct approach, a single leap into the origins fray. Introducing a biblically based, scientifically verifiable creation model represents such a leap.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-105#cite_note-105\">[85]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Likewise, two of the most prominent <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Young_Earth_creationism\" title=\"Young Earth creationism\">Young Earth creationism<\/a> organizations in the world have attempted to distinguish their views from intelligent design. Henry M. Morris of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Institute_for_Creation_Research\" title=\"Institute for Creation Research\">Institute for Creation Research<\/a> (ICR) wrote, in 1999, that ID, &#8220;even if well-meaning and effectively articulated, will not work! It has often been tried in the past and has failed, and it will fail today. The reason it won&#8217;t work is because it is not the Biblical method.&#8221; According to Morris: &#8220;The evidence of intelligent design\u2026 must be either followed by or accompanied by a sound presentation of true Biblical creationism if it is to be meaningful and lasting.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-106#cite_note-106\">[86]<\/a><\/sup> In 2002, Carl Wieland of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Answers_in_Genesis\" title=\"Answers in Genesis\">Answers in Genesis<\/a> (AiG) criticized design advocates who, though well-intentioned, &#8220;left the Bible out of it&#8221; and thereby unwittingly aided and abetted the modern rejection of the Bible. Wieland explained that &#8220;AiG&#8217;s major &#8216;strategy&#8217; is to boldly, but humbly, call the church back to its Biblical foundations\u2026 [so] we neither count ourselves a part of this movement nor campaign against it.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-107#cite_note-107\">[87]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Polls<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Several surveys were conducted prior to the December 2005 decision in <em>Kitzmiller v. Dover<\/em>, which sought to determine the level of support for intelligent design among certain groups. According to a 2005 <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Harris_Interactive\" title=\"Harris Interactive\">Harris poll<\/a>, 10% of adults in the United States viewed human beings as &#8220;so complex that they required a powerful force or intelligent being to help create them&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-108#cite_note-108\">[88]<\/a><\/sup> Although <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Zogby\" title=\"John Zogby\">Zogby polls<\/a> commissioned by the Discovery Institute show more support, these polls suffer from considerable flaws, such as having a very low response rate (248 out of 16,000), being conducted on behalf of an organization with an expressed interest in the outcome of the poll, and containing <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Leading_question\" title=\"Leading question\">leading questions<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-109#cite_note-109\">[89]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Polling_for_ID-110#cite_note-Polling_for_ID-110\">[90]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-111#cite_note-111\">[91]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">A May 2005 survey of nearly 1500 physicians in the United States conducted by the Louis Finkelstein Institute and HCD Research showed that 63% of the physicians agreed more with evolution than with intelligent design.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Findelsteinpollreport-112#cite_note-Findelsteinpollreport-112\">[n 22]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">A series of Gallup polls in the United States from 1982 through 2008 on &#8220;Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design&#8221; found support for &#8220;human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced formed of life, but God guided the process&#8221; of between 35% and 40%, support for &#8220;God created human beings in pretty much their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so&#8221; varied from 43% to 47%, and support for &#8220;human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced formed of life, but God had no part in the process&#8221; varied from 9% to 14%. The polls also noted answers to a series of more detailed questions.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-113#cite_note-113\">[92]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Film<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The film <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed\" title=\"Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed\">Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed<\/a><\/em> sparked further controversy in 2008. This documentary, hosted by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ben_Stein\" title=\"Ben Stein\">Ben Stein<\/a>, focuses on professors who have been asked to leave or have left numerous institutions because, the film insinuates, of their beliefs in Intelligent Design. One of the film&#8217;s first screenings resulted in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PZ_Myers\" title=\"PZ Myers\">Paul &#8220;PZ&#8221; Myers<\/a>, an interviewee in the film, being asked to leave the theater. There have also been allegations from some interviewees that interviews were recorded many times in order to get the exact phrasing required by the producer. The production company, Premise Media, also has helped finance some religious films such as <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Passion_of_the_Christ\" title=\"The Passion of the Christ\">The Passion of the Christ<\/a><\/em>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-114#cite_note-114\">[93]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-115#cite_note-115\">[94]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">Creating and teaching the controversy<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<table class=\"MsoNormalTable\" border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 1pt 0cm 1pt 10.8pt;\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: center;\" align=\"center\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 100%; padding: 3pt 10.8pt;\" width=\"100%\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">It has been suggested that this section be <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Splitting\" title=\"Wikipedia:Splitting\">split<\/a> into a new article titled <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Intelligent_design_and_science&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1\" title=\"Intelligent design and science (page does not exist)\"><span style=\"color: #ba0000;\">Intelligent design and science<\/span><\/a><\/em>. (<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk:Intelligent_design#Split_discussion\" title=\"Talk:Intelligent design\">Discuss<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teach_the_Controversy\" title=\"Teach the Controversy\">Teach the Controversy<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The intelligent design movement states that there is a debate among scientists about whether life evolved. The movement stresses the importance of recognizing the existence of this supposed debate, seeking to convince the public, politicians, and cultural leaders that schools should &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teach_the_Controversy\" title=\"Teach the Controversy\">Teach the Controversy<\/a>&#8220;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-116#cite_note-116\">[95]<\/a><\/sup> In fact, there is no such controversy in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_community\" title=\"Scientific community\">scientific community<\/a>; the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_consensus\" title=\"Scientific consensus\">scientific consensus<\/a> is that life evolved.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-117#cite_note-117\">[96]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-118#cite_note-118\">[97]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-119#cite_note-119\">[98]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-120#cite_note-120\">[99]<\/a><\/sup> Intelligent design is widely viewed as a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stalking_horse\" title=\"Stalking horse\">stalking horse<\/a> for its proponents&#8217; campaign against what they say is the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Materialism\" title=\"Materialism\">materialist<\/a> foundation of science, which they argue leaves no room for the possibility of God.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-121#cite_note-121\">[100]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-122#cite_note-122\">[101]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Neo-creationism<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neo-creationism\" title=\"Neo-creationism\">Neo-creationism<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Advocates of intelligent design seek to keep God and the Bible out of the discussion, and present intelligent design in the language of science as though it were a scientific hypothesis.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-IDstatementOnCreator-96#cite_note-IDstatementOnCreator-96\">[n 18]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Johnson-Touchstone-98#cite_note-Johnson-Touchstone-98\">[n 20]<\/a><\/sup> However, among a significant proportion of the general public in the United States the major concern is whether conventional evolutionary biology is compatible with belief in God and in the Bible, and how this issue is taught in schools.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Time-15-Aug-2005-123#cite_note-Time-15-Aug-2005-123\">[102]<\/a><\/sup> The public controversy was given widespread media coverage in the United States, particularly during the <em>Kitzmiller v. Dover<\/em> trial in late 2005 and after President <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/George_W._Bush\" title=\"George W. Bush\">George W. Bush<\/a> expressed support for the idea of teaching intelligent design alongside evolution in August 2005. In response to Bush&#8217;s statement and the pending federal trial, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Time_%28magazine%29\" title=\"Time (magazine)\">Time<\/a><\/em> magazine ran an eight-page cover story on the Evolution Wars in which they examined the issue of teaching intelligent design in the classroom.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-TIME-124#cite_note-TIME-124\">[103]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-DeWolf-125#cite_note-DeWolf-125\">[104]<\/a><\/sup> The cover of the magazine featured a parody of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Creation_of_Adam\" title=\"The Creation of Adam\">The Creation of Adam<\/a> from the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sistine_Chapel\" title=\"Sistine Chapel\">Sistine Chapel<\/a>. Rather than pointing at Adam, Michelangelo&#8217;s God points at the image of a chimpanzee contemplating the caption reading &#8220;The push to teach &#8216;intelligent design&#8217; raises a question: Does God have a place in science class?&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Chimp-126#cite_note-Chimp-126\">[105]<\/a><\/sup> In the <em>Kitzmiller v. Dover<\/em> case, the court ruled that intelligent design was a religious and creationist position, finding that God and intelligent design were both distinct from the material that should be covered in a science class.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitzruling-IDandGod-19#cite_note-kitzruling-IDandGod-19\">[n 6]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Theistic science<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theistic_science\" title=\"Theistic science\">Theistic science<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Empirical\" title=\"Empirical\">Empirical science<\/a> uses the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_method\" title=\"Scientific method\">scientific method<\/a> to create <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/A_posteriori\" title=\"A posteriori\">a posteriori<\/a><\/em> knowledge based on observation and repeated testing of hypotheses and theories. Intelligent design proponents seek to change this fundamental basis of science<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Forrest2000-127#cite_note-Forrest2000-127\">[106]<\/a><\/sup> by eliminating &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Naturalism_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"Naturalism (philosophy)\">methodological naturalism<\/a>&#8221; from science<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-128#cite_note-128\">[107]<\/a><\/sup> and replacing it with what the leader of the intelligent design movement, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Phillip_E._Johnson\" title=\"Phillip E. Johnson\">Phillip E. Johnson<\/a>, calls &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theistic_realism\" title=\"Theistic realism\">theistic realism<\/a>&#8220;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Johnsonconversation-129#cite_note-Johnsonconversation-129\">[n 23]<\/a><\/sup> Some have called this approach &#8220;methodological supernaturalism&#8221;, which means belief in a transcendent, nonnatural dimension of reality inhabited by a transcendent, nonnatural deity.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-130#cite_note-130\">[108]<\/a><\/sup> Intelligent design proponents argue that naturalistic explanations fail to explain certain phenomena and that supernatural explanations provide a very simple and intuitive explanation for the origins of life and the universe.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Watanabe-131#cite_note-Watanabe-131\">[n 24]<\/a><\/sup> Proponents say evidence exists in the forms of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Irreducible_complexity\" title=\"Irreducible complexity\">irreducible complexity<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Specified_complexity\" title=\"Specified complexity\">specified complexity<\/a> that cannot be explained by natural processes.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-DI-topquestions-0#cite_note-DI-topquestions-0\">[1]<\/a><\/sup> They also hold that religious neutrality requires the teaching of both evolution and intelligent design in schools, saying that teaching only evolution unfairly discriminates against those holding creationist beliefs. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teach_the_controversy\" title=\"Teach the controversy\">Teaching both<\/a>, they argue, allows for the possibility of religious belief, without causing the state to actually promote such beliefs. Many intelligent design followers believe that &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientism\" title=\"Scientism\">Scientism<\/a>&#8221; is itself a religion that promotes <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Secularism\" title=\"Secularism\">secularism<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Materialism\" title=\"Materialism\">materialism<\/a> in an attempt to erase <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theism\" title=\"Theism\">theism<\/a> from public life, and they view their work in the promotion of intelligent design as a way to return religion to a central role in education and other public spheres. Some allege that this larger debate is often the subtext for arguments made over intelligent design, though others note that intelligent design serves as an effective proxy for the religious beliefs of prominent intelligent design proponents in their efforts to advance their religious point of view within society.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-132#cite_note-132\">[109]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-133#cite_note-133\">[n 25]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-134#cite_note-134\">[110]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design has not presented a credible scientific case, substituting public support for scientific research.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-135#cite_note-135\">[111]<\/a><\/sup> If the argument to give &#8220;equal time for all theories&#8221; were actually practiced, there would be no logical limit to the number of mutually incompatible supernatural &#8220;theories&#8221; regarding the origins and diversity of life to be taught in the public school system, including intelligent design parodies such as the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster\" title=\"Flying Spaghetti Monster\">Flying Spaghetti Monster<\/a> &#8220;theory&#8221;; intelligent design does not provide a mechanism for discriminating among them. Philosopher of biology <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Elliott_Sober\" title=\"Elliott Sober\">Elliott Sober<\/a>, for example, states that intelligent design is not falsifiable because &#8220;[d]efenders of ID always have a way out&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-136#cite_note-136\">[112]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-137#cite_note-137\">[113]<\/a><\/sup> Intelligent design proponent <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Behe\" title=\"Michael Behe\">Michael Behe<\/a> concedes &#8220;You can&#8217;t prove intelligent design by experiment&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Time-15-Aug-2005-123#cite_note-Time-15-Aug-2005-123\">[102]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The inference that an intelligent designer created life on Earth, which advocate William Dembski has said could alternately be an &#8220;alien&#8221; life force,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Design_Inference-99#cite_note-Design_Inference-99\">[80]<\/a><\/sup> has been compared to the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/A_priori_and_a_posteriori_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"A priori and a posteriori (philosophy)\">a priori<\/a><\/em> claim that aliens helped the ancient Egyptians build the pyramids.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-138#cite_note-138\">[114]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-139#cite_note-139\">[115]<\/a><\/sup> In both cases, the effect of this outside intelligence is not repeatable, observable or falsifiable, and it violates the principle of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Parsimony\" title=\"Parsimony\">parsimony<\/a>. From a strictly <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Empiricism\" title=\"Empiricism\">empirical<\/a> standpoint, one may list what is known about Egyptian construction techniques, but one must admit ignorance about exactly how the Egyptians built the pyramids.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Inter-faith outreach<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Supporters of intelligent design have also reached out to other faith groups with similar accounts of creation with the hope that the broader coalition will have greater influence in supporting science education that does not contradict their religious views.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Watanabe-131#cite_note-Watanabe-131\">[n 24]<\/a><\/sup> Many religious bodies have responded by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Level_of_support_for_evolution#Support_for_evolution_by_religious_bodies\" title=\"Level of support for evolution\">expressing support for evolution<\/a>. The Roman Catholic church has stated that religious faith is fully compatible with science, which is limited to dealing only with the natural world<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-140#cite_note-140\">[116]<\/a><\/sup>\u2014a position described by the term <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theistic_evolution\" title=\"Theistic evolution\">theistic evolution<\/a><\/em>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-141#cite_note-141\">[117]<\/a><\/sup> While some in the Roman Catholic Church reject Intelligent design for various philosophical and theological reasons,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-142#cite_note-142\">[118]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-143#cite_note-143\">[119]<\/a><\/sup> others, such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christoph_Sch%C3%B6nborn\" title=\"Christoph Sch\u00f6nborn\">Christoph Sch\u00f6nborn<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Archbishop_of_Vienna\" title=\"Archbishop of Vienna\">Archbishop of Vienna<\/a>, have shown support for it.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Matt_Young.2C_Taner_Edis-144#cite_note-Matt_Young.2C_Taner_Edis-144\">[120]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Ronald_L._Numbers-145#cite_note-Ronald_L._Numbers-145\">[121]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Parliamentary_Assembly-146#cite_note-Parliamentary_Assembly-146\">[122]<\/a><\/sup> The arguments of intelligent design have been directly challenged by the over 10,000 <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Clergy\" title=\"Clergy\">clergy<\/a> who signed the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Clergy_Letter_Project\" title=\"Clergy Letter Project\">Clergy Letter Project<\/a>. Prominent scientists who strongly express religious faith, such as the astronomer <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/George_Coyne\" title=\"George Coyne\">George Coyne<\/a> and the biologist <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kenneth_R._Miller\" title=\"Kenneth R. Miller\">Ken Miller<\/a>, have been at the forefront of opposition to intelligent design. While creationist organizations have welcomed intelligent design&#8217;s support against <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Naturalism_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"Naturalism (philosophy)\">naturalism<\/a>, they have also been critical of its refusal to identify the designer,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-147#cite_note-147\">[123]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-148#cite_note-148\">[124]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-149#cite_note-149\">[125]<\/a><\/sup> and have pointed to previous failures of the same argument.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-150#cite_note-150\">[126]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Rabbi <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Natan_Slifkin\" title=\"Natan Slifkin\">Natan Slifkin<\/a> directly criticized the advocates of intelligent design as presenting a perspective of God that is dangerous to religion.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Slifkin-151#cite_note-Slifkin-151\">[127]<\/a><\/sup> Those who promote it as parallel to religion, he asserts, do not truly understand it. Slifkin criticizes intelligent design&#8217;s advocacy of teaching their perspective in biology classes, wondering why no one claims that God&#8217;s hand should be taught in other secular classes, such as history, physics or geology. Slifkin also asserts that the intelligent design movement is inordinately concerned with portraying God as &#8220;in control&#8221; when it comes to things that cannot be easily explained by science, but not in control in respect to things which <em>can<\/em> be explained by scientific theory.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Slifkin-151#cite_note-Slifkin-151\">[127]<\/a><\/sup> Kenneth Miller expressed a view similar to Slifkin&#8217;s: &#8220;[T]he struggles of the Intelligent Design movement are best understood as clamorous and disappointing double failures\u2014rejected by science because they do not fit the facts, and having failed religion because they think too little of God.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-152#cite_note-152\">[128]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Defining science<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the world.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-153#cite_note-153\">[129]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-FOOTNOTEPopper20023-154#cite_note-FOOTNOTEPopper20023-154\">[130]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-155#cite_note-155\">[131]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-156#cite_note-156\">[132]<\/a><\/sup> The boundaries between what is and what is not to be considered science, known as the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Demarcation_problem\" title=\"Demarcation problem\">demarcation problem<\/a>, continues to be debated among <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophers_of_science\" title=\"Philosophers of science\">philosophers of science<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientists\" title=\"Scientists\">scientists<\/a> in various fields.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-157#cite_note-157\">[133]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_National_Academy_of_Sciences\" title=\"United States National Academy of Sciences\">U.S. National Academy of Sciences<\/a> has stated that &#8220;creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_method\" title=\"Scientific method\">methods of science<\/a>.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-158#cite_note-158\">[134]<\/a><\/sup> The U.S. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Science_Teachers_Association\" title=\"National Science Teachers Association\">National Science Teachers Association<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/American_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Science\" title=\"American Association for the Advancement of Science\">American Association for the Advancement of Science<\/a> have termed it <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pseudoscience\" title=\"Pseudoscience\">pseudoscience<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-159#cite_note-159\">[n 26]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-harvard-83#cite_note-harvard-83\">[71]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-aaas-84#cite_note-aaas-84\">[n 14]<\/a><\/sup> Others in the scientific community have concurred,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-160#cite_note-160\">[n 27]<\/a><\/sup> and some have called it <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Junk_science\" title=\"Junk science\">junk science<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-161#cite_note-161\">[n 28]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-162#cite_note-162\">[135]<\/a><\/sup> For a theory to qualify as scientific,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-163#cite_note-163\">[n 29]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-164#cite_note-164\">[136]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitzruling_pg64-165#cite_note-kitzruling_pg64-165\">[n 30]<\/a><\/sup> it is expected to be:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Consistent<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Parsimonious<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> (sparing in its proposed entities or explanations, see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Occam%27s_Razor\" title=\"Occam's Razor\">Occam&#8217;s Razor<\/a>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Useful<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> (describes and explains observed phenomena, and can be used predictively) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Empirically testable and falsifiable<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> (see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Falsifiability\" title=\"Falsifiability\">Falsifiability<\/a>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Based on multiple observations<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\">, often in the form of controlled, repeated experiments <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Correctable and dynamic<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> (modified in the light of observations that do not support it) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Progressive<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> (refines previous theories) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\">Provisional<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> or tentative (is open to experimental checking, and does not assert certainty) <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">For any theory, hypothesis or conjecture to be considered scientific, it must meet most, and ideally all, of these criteria. The fewer criteria are met, the less scientific it is; and if it meets only a few or none at all, then it cannot be treated as scientific in any meaningful sense of the word. Typical objections to defining intelligent design as science are that it lacks consistency,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-166#cite_note-166\">[137]<\/a><\/sup> violates the principle of parsimony,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-167#cite_note-167\">[n 31]<\/a><\/sup> is not scientifically useful,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-168#cite_note-168\">[n 32]<\/a><\/sup> is not falsifiable,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-169#cite_note-169\">[n 33]<\/a><\/sup> is not empirically testable,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-170#cite_note-170\">[n 34]<\/a><\/sup> and is not correctable, dynamic, provisional or progressive.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-171#cite_note-171\">[n 35]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-172#cite_note-172\">[n 36]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-173#cite_note-173\">[n 37]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Critics also say that the intelligent design doctrine does not meet the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Daubert_Standard\" title=\"Daubert Standard\">Daubert Standard<\/a>,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-174#cite_note-174\">[138]<\/a><\/sup> the criteria for <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_evidence\" title=\"Scientific evidence\">scientific evidence<\/a> mandated by the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States\" title=\"Supreme Court of the United States\">US Supreme Court<\/a>. The Daubert Standard governs which evidence can be considered scientific in United States federal courts and most state courts. Its four criteria are:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">The theoretical underpinnings of the methods must yield testable predictions by means of which the theory could be falsified. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">The methods should preferably be published in a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peer_review\" title=\"Peer review\">peer-reviewed<\/a> journal. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">There should be a known rate of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Error\" title=\"Error\">error<\/a> that can be used in evaluating the results. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">The methods should be generally accepted within the relevant scientific community. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">In <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/em>, using these criteria and others mentioned above, Judge Jones <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/6:Curriculum,_Conclusion\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/6:Curriculum, Conclusion\">ruled that<\/a> &#8220;&#8230; we have addressed the seminal question of whether ID is science. We have concluded that it is not, and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">At the Kitzmiller trial, philosopher <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_T._Pennock\" title=\"Robert T. Pennock\">Robert T. Pennock<\/a> described a common approach to distinguishing science from non-science as examining a theory&#8217;s compliance with <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Methodological_naturalism\" title=\"Methodological naturalism\">methodological naturalism<\/a>, the basic method in science of seeking natural explanations without assuming the existence or nonexistence of the supernatural.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-175#cite_note-175\">[139]<\/a><\/sup> Intelligent design proponents criticize this method and argue that science, if its goal is to discover truth, must be able to accept evidentially supported, supernatural explanations.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-discovery-7#cite_note-discovery-7\">[5]<\/a><\/sup> Additionally, philosopher of science <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Larry_Laudan\" title=\"Larry Laudan\">Larry Laudan<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cosmologist\" title=\"Cosmologist\">cosmologist<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sean_M._Carroll\" title=\"Sean M. Carroll\">Sean Carroll<\/a> argue against any <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/A_priori_and_a_posteriori\" title=\"A priori and a posteriori\">a priori<\/a><\/em> criteria for distinguishing science from pseudoscience.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-176#cite_note-176\">[140]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-177#cite_note-177\">[141]<\/a><\/sup> Laudan, as well as philosopher Barbara Forrest, state that the content of the hypothesis must first be examined to determine its ability to solve empirical problems.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-laudan-178#cite_note-laudan-178\">[142]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-forrest-179#cite_note-forrest-179\">[143]<\/a><\/sup> Methodological naturalism is therefore an <em>a posteriori<\/em> criterion due to its ability to yield consistent results.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-laudan-178#cite_note-laudan-178\">[142]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-forrest-179#cite_note-forrest-179\">[143]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Peer review<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The failure to follow the procedures of scientific discourse and the failure to submit work to the scientific community that withstands scrutiny have weighed against intelligent design being accepted as valid science.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitzruling_pg87-180#cite_note-kitzruling_pg87-180\">[144]<\/a><\/sup> The intelligent design movement has not published a properly peer-reviewed article in a scientific journal.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitzruling_pg87-180#cite_note-kitzruling_pg87-180\">[144]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design, by appealing to a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Supernatural\" title=\"Supernatural\">supernatural<\/a> agent, directly conflicts with the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Principle\" title=\"Principle\">principles<\/a> of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Science\" title=\"Science\">science<\/a>, which limit its inquiries to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Empirical\" title=\"Empirical\">empirical<\/a>, observable and ultimately <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Falsifiable\" title=\"Falsifiable\">testable<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Data\" title=\"Data\">data<\/a> and which require explanations to be based on empirical <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_method\" title=\"Scientific method\">evidence<\/a>. Dembski, Behe and other intelligent design proponents say bias by the scientific community is to blame for the failure of their research to be published.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-main-181#cite_note-main-181\">[145]<\/a><\/sup> Intelligent design proponents believe that their writings are rejected for not conforming to purely naturalistic, non-supernatural mechanisms rather than because their research is not up to &#8220;journal standards&#8221;, and that the merit of their articles is overlooked. Some scientists describe this claim as a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Conspiracy_theory\" title=\"Conspiracy theory\">conspiracy theory<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-182#cite_note-182\">[146]<\/a><\/sup> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Shermer\" title=\"Michael Shermer\">Michael Shermer<\/a> has rebutted the claim, noting &#8220;Anyone who thinks that scientists do not question Darwinism has never been to an evolutionary conference.&#8221; He noted that scientists such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Joan_Roughgarden\" title=\"Joan Roughgarden\">Joan Roughgarden<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lynn_Margulis\" title=\"Lynn Margulis\">Lynn Margulis<\/a> have challenged certain Darwinist theories and offered explanations of their own and despite this they &#8220;have not been persecuted, shunned, fired or even expelled. Why? Because they are doing science, not religion.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-183#cite_note-183\">[147]<\/a><\/sup> The issue that supernatural explanations do not conform to the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_method\" title=\"Scientific method\">scientific method<\/a> became a sticking point for intelligent design proponents in the 1990s, and is addressed in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wedge_strategy\" title=\"Wedge strategy\">wedge strategy<\/a> as an aspect of science that must be challenged before intelligent design can be accepted by the broader scientific community.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Critics and advocates debate over whether intelligent design produces new research and has legitimately attempted to publish this research. For instance, the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Templeton_Foundation\" title=\"John Templeton Foundation\">Templeton Foundation<\/a>, a former funder of the Discovery Institute and a major supporter of projects seeking to reconcile science and religion, says that it asked intelligent design proponents to submit proposals for actual research, but none were ever submitted. Charles L. Harper Jr., foundation vice-president, said: &#8220;From the point of view of rigor and intellectual seriousness, the intelligent design people don&#8217;t come out very well in our world of scientific review&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-184#cite_note-184\">[148]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The only article published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal that made a case for intelligent design was quickly withdrawn by the publisher for having circumvented the journal&#8217;s peer-review standards.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-185#cite_note-185\">[149]<\/a><\/sup> Written by the Discovery Institute&#8217;s Center for Science &amp; Culture Director <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stephen_C._Meyer\" title=\"Stephen C. Meyer\">Stephen C. Meyer<\/a>, it appeared in the peer-reviewed journal <em>Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington<\/em> in August 2004.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Meyer2004-186#cite_note-Meyer2004-186\">[150]<\/a><\/sup> The article was a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Literature_review\" title=\"Literature review\">literature review<\/a>, which means that it did not present any new research, but rather culled quotations and claims from other papers to argue that the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cambrian_explosion\" title=\"Cambrian explosion\">Cambrian explosion<\/a> could not have happened by natural processes. The choice of venue for this article was also considered problematic, because it was so outside the normal subject matter (see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sternberg_peer_review_controversy\" title=\"Sternberg peer review controversy\">Sternberg peer review controversy<\/a><sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-187#cite_note-187\">[n 38]<\/a><\/sup>). Dembski has written that &#8220;perhaps the best reason [to be skeptical of his ideas] is that intelligent design has yet to establish itself as a thriving scientific research program.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-188#cite_note-188\">[151]<\/a><\/sup> In a 2001 interview, Dembski said that he stopped submitting to peer-reviewed journals because of their slow time-to-print and that he makes more money from publishing books.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-189#cite_note-189\">[152]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">In the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Dover trial<\/a>, the judge found that intelligent design features no scientific research or testing.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-190#cite_note-190\">[153]<\/a><\/sup> There, intelligent design proponents cited just one paper, on simulation modeling of evolution by Behe and Snoke,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-191#cite_note-191\">[154]<\/a><\/sup> which mentioned neither irreducible complexity nor intelligent design and which Behe admitted did not rule out known evolutionary mechanisms.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-192#cite_note-192\">[155]<\/a><\/sup> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Lynch_%28geneticist%29\" title=\"Michael Lynch (geneticist)\">Michael Lynch<\/a> called the conclusions of the article &#8220;an artifact of unwarranted biological assumptions, inappropriate mathematical modeling, and faulty logic&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-193#cite_note-193\">[156]<\/a><\/sup> In sworn testimony, however, Behe said: &#8220;There are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-194#cite_note-194\">[157]<\/a><\/sup> As summarized by the judge, Behe conceded that there are no peer-reviewed articles supporting his claims of intelligent design or irreducible complexity. In his ruling, the judge wrote: &#8220;A final indicator of how ID has failed to demonstrate scientific warrant is the complete absence of peer-reviewed publications supporting the theory&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitzruling_pg87-180#cite_note-kitzruling_pg87-180\">[144]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The Discovery Institute insists that a number of intelligent design articles have been published in peer-reviewed journals,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-195#cite_note-195\">[158]<\/a><\/sup> including in its list the two articles mentioned above. Critics, largely members of the scientific community, reject this claim, stating that no established scientific journal has yet published an intelligent design article. Rather, intelligent design proponents have set up their own journals with peer review that lacks <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Impartiality\" title=\"Impartiality\">impartiality<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rigour\" title=\"Rigour\">rigor<\/a>,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-196#cite_note-196\">[n 39]<\/a><\/sup> consisting entirely of intelligent design supporters.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-197#cite_note-197\">[n 40]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Intelligence as an observable quality<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">The phrase <em>intelligent<\/em> design makes use of an assumption of the quality of an observable <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligence_%28trait%29\" title=\"Intelligence (trait)\">intelligence<\/a>, a concept that has no <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_consensus\" title=\"Scientific consensus\">scientific consensus<\/a> definition. William Dembski, for example, has written that &#8220;Intelligence leaves behind a characteristic signature&#8221;. The characteristics of intelligence are assumed by intelligent design proponents to be <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Observation\" title=\"Observation\">observable<\/a> without specifying what the criteria for the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Measurement\" title=\"Measurement\">measurement<\/a> of intelligence should be. Dembski, instead, asserts that &#8220;in special sciences ranging from <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Forensics\" title=\"Forensics\">forensics<\/a> to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Archaeology\" title=\"Archaeology\">archaeology<\/a> to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/SETI\" title=\"SETI\">SETI<\/a> (the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence), appeal to a designing intelligence is indispensable&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-198#cite_note-198\">[159]<\/a><\/sup> How this appeal is made and what this implies as to the definition of intelligence are topics left largely unaddressed. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Seth_Shostak\" title=\"Seth Shostak\">Seth Shostak<\/a>, a researcher with the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/SETI_Institute\" title=\"SETI Institute\">SETI Institute<\/a>, disputed Dembski&#8217;s comparison of SETI and intelligent design, saying that intelligent design advocates base their inference of design on complexity\u2014the argument being that some biological systems are too complex to have been made by natural processes\u2014while SETI researchers are looking primarily for <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Artificial_creation\" title=\"Artificial creation\">artificiality<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-199#cite_note-199\">[160]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Critics say that the design detection methods proposed by intelligent design proponents are radically different from conventional design detection, undermining the key elements that make it possible as legitimate science. Intelligent design proponents, they say, are proposing both searching for a designer without knowing anything about that designer&#8217;s abilities, parameters, or intentions (which scientists do know when searching for the results of human intelligence), as well as denying the very distinction between natural\/artificial design that allows scientists to compare complex designed artifacts against the background of the sorts of complexity found in nature.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-200#cite_note-200\">[n 41]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">As a means of criticism, certain <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_skepticism\" title=\"Scientific skepticism\">skeptics<\/a> have pointed to a challenge of intelligent design derived from the study of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Artificial_intelligence\" title=\"Artificial intelligence\">artificial intelligence<\/a>. The criticism is a counter to intelligent design claims about what makes a design intelligent, specifically that &#8220;no preprogrammed device can be truly intelligent, that intelligence is irreducible to natural processes&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-201#cite_note-201\">[161]<\/a><\/sup> This claim is similar in type to an assumption of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cartesian_dualism\" title=\"Cartesian dualism\">Cartesian dualism<\/a> that posits a strict separation between &#8220;mind&#8221; and the material <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Universe\" title=\"Universe\">Universe<\/a>. However, in studies of artificial intelligence, while there is an implicit assumption that supposed &#8220;intelligence&#8221; or <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creativity\" title=\"Creativity\">creativity<\/a> of a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Computer_program\" title=\"Computer program\">computer program<\/a> is determined by the capabilities given to it by the computer <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Programmer\" title=\"Programmer\">programmer<\/a>, artificial intelligence need not be bound to an inflexible system of rules. Rather, if a computer program can access <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Randomness\" title=\"Randomness\">randomness<\/a> as a function, this effectively allows for a flexible, creative, and adaptive intelligence. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolutionary_algorithms\" title=\"Evolutionary algorithms\">Evolutionary algorithms<\/a>, a subfield of machine learning (itself a subfield of artificial intelligence), have been used to mathematically demonstrate that randomness and selection can be used to &#8220;evolve&#8221; complex, highly adapted structures that are not explicitly designed by a programmer. Evolutionary algorithms use the Darwinian metaphor of random mutation, selection and the survival of the fittest to solve diverse mathematical and scientific problems that are usually not solvable using conventional methods. Intelligence derived from randomness is essentially indistinguishable from the &#8220;innate&#8221; intelligence associated with biological organisms, and poses a challenge to the intelligent design conception that intelligence itself necessarily requires a designer. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cognitive_science\" title=\"Cognitive science\">Cognitive science<\/a> continues to investigate the nature of intelligence along these lines of inquiry. The intelligent design community, for the most part, relies on the assumption that intelligence is readily apparent as a fundamental and basic property of complex systems.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-202#cite_note-202\">[162]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Arguments from ignorance<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eugenie_Scott\" title=\"Eugenie Scott\">Eugenie Scott<\/a>, along with Glenn Branch and other critics, has argued that many points raised by intelligent design proponents are <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_ignorance\" title=\"Argument from ignorance\">arguments from ignorance<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-2002-09-10-203#cite_note-2002-09-10-203\">[163]<\/a><\/sup> In the argument from ignorance, a lack of evidence for one view is erroneously argued to constitute proof of the correctness of another view. Scott and Branch say that intelligent design is an argument from ignorance because it relies on a lack of knowledge for its conclusion: lacking a natural explanation for certain specific aspects of evolution, we assume intelligent cause. They contend most scientists would reply that the unexplained is not unexplainable, and that &#8220;we don&#8217;t know yet&#8221; is a more appropriate response than invoking a cause outside science.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-2002-09-10-203#cite_note-2002-09-10-203\">[163]<\/a><\/sup> Particularly, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Behe\" title=\"Michael Behe\">Michael Behe<\/a>&#8216;s demands for ever more detailed explanations of the historical evolution of molecular systems seem to assume a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/False_dichotomy\" title=\"False dichotomy\">false dichotomy<\/a>, where either evolution or design is the proper explanation, and any perceived failure of evolution becomes a victory for design. Scott and Branch also contend that the supposedly novel contributions proposed by intelligent design proponents have not served as the basis for any productive scientific research. Philosopher of science Bradley Monton defends Behe on this point, noting that Behe does not view every complex biological system whose evolution is currently unknown as irreducibly complex.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-monton-204#cite_note-monton-204\">[164]<\/a><\/sup> This shows, Monton continues, that Behe is not appealing to ignorance, but is &#8220;giving a positive argument that it&#8217;s unlikely for such systems to evolve without an intelligent designer.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-monton-204#cite_note-monton-204\">[164]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">God of the gaps<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent design has also been characterized as a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/God_of_the_gaps\" title=\"God of the gaps\">God-of-the-gaps<\/a> argument,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Stanford--GodoftheGaps-205#cite_note-Stanford--GodoftheGaps-205\">[165]<\/a><\/sup> which has the following form:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">There is a gap in scientific knowledge. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">The gap is filled with acts of God (or <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_designer\" title=\"Intelligent designer\">intelligent designer<\/a>) and therefore proves the existence of God (or intelligent designer).<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-Stanford--GodoftheGaps-205#cite_note-Stanford--GodoftheGaps-205\">[165]<\/a><\/sup> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">A God-of-the-gaps argument is the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theological\" title=\"Theological\">theological<\/a> version of an <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_ignorance\" title=\"Argument from ignorance\">argument from ignorance<\/a>. A key feature of this type of argument is that it merely answers outstanding questions with explanations (often <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Supernatural\" title=\"Supernatural\">supernatural<\/a>) that are unverifiable and ultimately themselves subject to unanswerable questions.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-206#cite_note-206\">[166]<\/a><\/sup> Philosopher of science Bradley Monton states that Behe&#8217;s claim of irreducible complexity is a positive claim rather than an argument from ignorance, and therefore not a God-of-the-gaps argument.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-monton-204#cite_note-monton-204\">[164]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/History_of_science\" title=\"History of science\">Historians of science<\/a> observe that the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Astronomy\" title=\"Astronomy\">astronomy<\/a> of the earliest <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Civilization\" title=\"Civilization\">civilizations<\/a>, although astonishing and incorporating <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mathematics\" title=\"Mathematics\">mathematical constructions<\/a> far in excess of any practical value, proved to be misdirected and of little importance to the development of science, because they failed to inquire more carefully into the mechanisms that drove the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Astronomical_object\" title=\"Astronomical object\">heavenly bodies<\/a> across the sky.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-207#cite_note-207\">[167]<\/a><\/sup> It was the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Greek_civilization\" title=\"Greek civilization\">Greek civilization<\/a> that first practised science, although not yet a mathematically-oriented experimental science, but nevertheless an attempt to rationalize the world of natural experience without recourse to divine intervention.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-208#cite_note-208\">[168]<\/a><\/sup> In this historically motivated definition of science any appeal to an intelligent creator is explicitly excluded for the paralysing effect it may have on the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scientific_progress\" title=\"Scientific progress\">scientific progress<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">Kitzmiller trial<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">Main article: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><em><span lang=\"EN\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/span><\/em><span lang=\"EN\"> was the first direct challenge brought in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_federal_courts\" title=\"United States federal courts\">United States federal courts<\/a> against a public school district that required the presentation of intelligent design as an alternative to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolution\" title=\"Evolution\">evolution<\/a>. The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creationism\" title=\"Creationism\">creationism<\/a>, and that the school board policy thus violated the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Establishment_Clause\" title=\"Establishment Clause\">Establishment Clause<\/a> of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution\" title=\"First Amendment to the United States Constitution\">First Amendment to the United States Constitution<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-209#cite_note-209\">[169]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">Eleven parents of students in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dover,_Pennsylvania\" title=\"Dover, Pennsylvania\">Dover<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pennsylvania\" title=\"Pennsylvania\">Pennsylvania<\/a>, sued the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Dover Area School District\">Dover Area School District<\/a> over a statement that the school board required be read aloud in ninth-grade science classes when evolution was taught. The plaintiffs were represented by the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/American_Civil_Liberties_Union\" title=\"American Civil Liberties Union\">American Civil Liberties Union<\/a> (ACLU), <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Americans_United_for_Separation_of_Church_and_State\" title=\"Americans United for Separation of Church and State\">Americans United for Separation of Church and State<\/a> (AU) and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pepper_Hamilton_LLP\" title=\"Pepper Hamilton LLP\">Pepper Hamilton LLP<\/a>. The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a> (NCSE) acted as consultants for the plaintiffs. The defendants were represented by the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_More_Law_Center\" title=\"Thomas More Law Center\">Thomas More Law Center<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-210#cite_note-210\">[170]<\/a><\/sup> The suit was tried in a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bench_trial\" title=\"Bench trial\">bench trial<\/a> from September 26 to November 4, 2005, before Judge <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_E._Jones_III\" title=\"John E. Jones III\">John E. Jones III<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kenneth_R._Miller\" title=\"Kenneth R. Miller\">Ken Miller<\/a>, Kevin Padian, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Brian_Alters\" title=\"Brian Alters\">Brian Alters<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_T._Pennock\" title=\"Robert T. Pennock\">Robert Pennock<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Barbara_Forrest\" title=\"Barbara Forrest\">Barbara Forrest<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Haught\" title=\"John Haught\">John Haught<\/a> served as expert witnesses for the prosecution. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Behe\" title=\"Michael Behe\">Michael Behe<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Steve_Fuller_%28sociologist%29\" title=\"Steve Fuller (sociologist)\">Steve Fuller<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scott_Minnich\" title=\"Scott Minnich\">Scott Minnich<\/a> served as expert witnesses for the defense.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">On December 20, 2005, Judge Jones issued his 139-page <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Finding_of_fact\" title=\"Finding of fact\">findings of fact<\/a> and decision, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District_et_al.\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District et al.\">ruling that<\/a> the Dover mandate was unconstitutional, and barring intelligent design from being taught in Pennsylvania&#8217;s Middle District public school science classrooms. The eight Dover school board members who voted for the intelligent design requirement were all defeated in a November 8, 2005, election by challengers who opposed the teaching of intelligent design in a science class, and the current school board president stated that the board does not intend to appeal the ruling.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-211#cite_note-211\">[171]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">In his finding of facts, Judge Jones made the following condemnation of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teach_the_Controversy\" title=\"Teach the Controversy\">Teach the Controversy<\/a> strategy:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">&#8220;Moreover, ID&#8217;s backers have sought to avoid the scientific scrutiny which we have now determined that it cannot withstand by advocating that the controversy, but not ID itself, should be taught in science class. This tactic is at best disingenuous, and at worst a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wiktionary.org\/wiki\/canard#Noun\" title=\"wikt:canard\">canard<\/a>.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Reaction<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">Judge Jones himself anticipated that his ruling would be criticized, saying in his decision that:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">&#8220;Those who disagree with our holding will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge. If so, they will have erred as this is manifestly not an activist Court. Rather, this case came to us as the result of the activism of an ill-informed faction on a school board, aided by a national public interest law firm eager to find a constitutional test case on ID, who in combination drove the Board to adopt an imprudent and ultimately unconstitutional policy. The breathtaking inanity of the Board&#8217;s decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial. The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-kitz137-212#cite_note-kitz137-212\">[172]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">As Jones had predicted, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_G._West\" title=\"John G. West\">John G. West<\/a>, Associate Director of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Science_and_Culture\" title=\"Center for Science and Culture\">Center for Science and Culture<\/a> at <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>, said:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">&#8220;The Dover decision is an attempt by an activist federal judge to stop the spread of a scientific idea and even to prevent criticism of Darwinian evolution through government-imposed censorship rather than open debate, and it won&#8217;t work. He has conflated Discovery Institute&#8217;s position with that of the Dover school board, and he totally misrepresents intelligent design and the motivations of the scientists who research it.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-213#cite_note-213\">[173]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Newspapers have noted with interest that the judge is &#8220;a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Republican_Party_%28United_States%29\" title=\"Republican Party (United States)\">Republican<\/a> and a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Church_%28building%29\" title=\"Church (building)\">churchgoer<\/a>&#8220;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-214#cite_note-214\">[174]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-215#cite_note-215\">[175]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-216#cite_note-216\">[176]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-217#cite_note-217\">[177]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Subsequently, the decision has been examined in a search for flaws and conclusions, partly by intelligent design supporters aiming to avoid future defeats in court. In the Spring of 2007 the University of Montana Law review published three articles.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-218#cite_note-218\">[178]<\/a><\/sup> In the first, David K. DeWolf, John G. West and Casey Luskin, all of the Discovery Institute, argued that intelligent design is a valid scientific theory, the Jones court should not have addressed the question of whether it was a scientific theory, and that the Kitzmiller decision will have no effect at all on the development and adoption of intelligent design as an alternative to standard evolutionary theory.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-DeWolf-125#cite_note-DeWolf-125\">[104]<\/a><\/sup> In the second <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peter_Irons\" title=\"Peter Irons\">Peter Irons<\/a> responded, arguing that the decision was extremely well reasoned and spells the death knell for the intelligent design efforts to introduce creationism in public schools,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-219#cite_note-219\">[179]<\/a><\/sup> while in the third, DeWolf et al. answer the points made by Irons.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-220#cite_note-220\">[180]<\/a><\/sup> However, fear of a similar lawsuit has resulted in other school boards abandoning intelligent design &#8220;teach the controversy&#8221; proposals.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-ForrestMayPaper-20#cite_note-ForrestMayPaper-20\">[15]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">In April 2010, the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/American_Academy_of_Religion\" title=\"American Academy of Religion\">American Academy of Religion<\/a> issued <em>Guidelines for Teaching About Religion in K-12 Public Schools in the United States<\/em>, which included guidance that <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creation_science\" title=\"Creation science\">creation science<\/a> or intelligent design should not be taught in science classes, as &#8220;Creation science and intelligent design represent worldviews that fall outside of the realm of science that is defined as (and limited to) a method of inquiry based on gathering observable and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.&#8221; However, they, as well as other &#8220;worldviews that focus on speculation regarding the origins of life represent another important and relevant form of human inquiry that is appropriately studied in literature or social sciences courses. Such study, however, must include a diversity of worldviews representing a variety of religious and philosophical perspectives and must avoid privileging one view as more legitimate than others.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-221#cite_note-221\">[181]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">Status outside the United States<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Europe<\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">In June 2007 the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Council_of_Europe\" title=\"Council of Europe\">Council of Europe<\/a>&#8216;s &#8220;Committee on Culture, Science and Education&#8221; issued a report, <em>The dangers of creationism in education<\/em>, which states &#8220;Creationism in any of its forms, such as &#8216;intelligent design&#8217;, is not based on facts, does not use any scientific reasoning and its contents are pathetically inadequate for science classes.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-222#cite_note-222\">[182]<\/a><\/sup> In describing the dangers posed to education by teaching creationism, it described intelligent design as &#8220;anti-science&#8221; and involving &#8220;blatant scientific fraud&#8221; and &#8220;intellectual deception&#8221; that &#8220;blurs the nature, objectives and limits of science&#8221; and links it and other forms of creationism to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Denialism\" title=\"Denialism\">denialism<\/a>. On October 4, 2007, the Council of Europe&#8217;s Parliamentary Assembly approved a resolution stating that schools should &#8220;resist presentation of creationist ideas in any discipline other than religion&#8221;, including &#8220;intelligent design&#8221;, which it described as &#8220;the latest, more refined version of creationism&#8221;, &#8220;presented in a more subtle way&#8221;. The resolution emphasises that the aim of the report is not to question or to fight a belief, but to &#8220;warn against certain tendencies to pass off a belief as science&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-223#cite_note-223\">[183]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Education_in_the_United_Kingdom\" title=\"Education in the United Kingdom\">In the United Kingdom<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_education\" title=\"Public education\">public education<\/a> includes <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Religious_Education\" title=\"Religious Education\">Religious Education<\/a> as a compulsory subject, and there are many <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Faith_school\" title=\"Faith school\">faith schools<\/a> that teach the ethos of particular denominations. When it was revealed that a group called <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Truth_in_Science\" title=\"Truth in Science\">Truth in Science<\/a> had distributed DVDs produced by the Discovery Institute affiliate Illustra Media<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-224#cite_note-224\">[n 42]<\/a><\/sup> featuring Discovery Institute fellows making the case for design in nature,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-225#cite_note-225\">[184]<\/a><\/sup> and claimed they were being used by 59 schools,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-226#cite_note-226\">[185]<\/a><\/sup> the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Department_for_Education_and_Skills_%28United_Kingdom%29\" title=\"Department for Education and Skills (United Kingdom)\">Department for Education and Skills<\/a> (DfES) stated that &#8220;Neither creationism nor intelligent design are taught as a subject in schools, and are not specified in the science curriculum&#8221; (part of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Curriculum_%28England,_Wales_and_Northern_Ireland%29\" title=\"National Curriculum (England, Wales and Northern Ireland)\">National Curriculum<\/a>, which does not apply to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Independent_school_%28UK%29\" title=\"Independent school (UK)\">independent schools<\/a> or to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Education_in_Scotland\" title=\"Education in Scotland\">education in Scotland<\/a>).<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-227#cite_note-227\">[186]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-228#cite_note-228\">[187]<\/a><\/sup> The DfES subsequently stated that &#8220;Intelligent design is not a recognised scientific theory; therefore, it is not included in the science curriculum&#8221;, but left the way open for it to be explored in religious education in relation to different beliefs, as part of a syllabus set by a local <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Standing_Advisory_Council_on_Religious_Education\" title=\"Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education\">Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-229#cite_note-229\">[188]<\/a><\/sup> In 2006 the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Qualifications_and_Curriculum_Authority\" title=\"Qualifications and Curriculum Authority\">Qualifications and Curriculum Authority<\/a> produced a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Religious_Education\" title=\"Religious Education\">Religious Education<\/a> model unit in which pupils can learn about religious and nonreligious views about creationism, intelligent design and evolution by natural selection.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-230#cite_note-230\">[189]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-231#cite_note-231\">[190]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">On June 25, 2007, the UK Government responded to an e-petition by saying that creationism and intelligent design should not be taught as science, though teachers would be expected to answer pupils&#8217; questions within the standard framework of established scientific theories.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-232#cite_note-232\">[191]<\/a><\/sup> Detailed government &#8220;Creationism teaching guidance&#8221; for schools in England was published on September 18, 2007. It states that &#8220;Intelligent design lies wholly outside of science&#8221;, has no underpinning scientific principles, or explanations, and is not accepted by the science community as a whole. Though it should not be taught as science, &#8220;questions about creationism and intelligent design which arise in science lessons, for example, as a result of media coverage, could provide the opportunity to explain or explore why they are not considered to be scientific theories and, in the right context, why evolution is considered to be a scientific theory&#8221;. However, &#8220;Teachers of subjects such as RE, history or citizenship may deal with creationism and intelligent design in their lessons&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-teachernet-9#cite_note-teachernet-9\">[n 5]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/British_Centre_for_Science_Education\" title=\"British Centre for Science Education\">British Centre for Science Education<\/a> lobbying group has the goal of &#8220;countering creationism within the UK&#8221; and has been involved in government lobbying in the UK in this regard.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-233#cite_note-233\">[192]<\/a><\/sup> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Northern_Ireland\" title=\"Northern Ireland\">Northern Ireland<\/a>&#8216;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Department_of_Education_%28Northern_Ireland%29\" title=\"Department of Education (Northern Ireland)\">Department for Education<\/a> says that the curriculum provides an opportunity for alternative theories to be taught. The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Democratic_Unionist_Party\" title=\"Democratic Unionist Party\">Democratic Unionist Party<\/a> (DUP)\u2014which has links to fundamentalist Christianity\u2014has been campaigning to have intelligent design taught in science classes. A DUP former Member of Parliament, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/David_Simpson_%28UK_politician%29\" title=\"David Simpson (UK politician)\">David Simpson<\/a>, has sought assurances from the education minister that pupils will not lose marks if they give creationist or intelligent design answers to science questions.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-234#cite_note-234\">[193]<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-235#cite_note-235\">[194]<\/a><\/sup> In 2007, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lisburn\" title=\"Lisburn\">Lisburn<\/a> city council voted in favor of a DUP recommendation to write to post-primary schools asking what their plans are to develop teaching material in relation to &#8220;creation, intelligent design and other theories of origin&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-236#cite_note-236\">[195]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Plans by Dutch Education Minister <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Maria_van_der_Hoeven\" title=\"Maria van der Hoeven\">Maria van der Hoeven<\/a> to &#8220;stimulate an academic debate&#8221; on the subject in 2005 caused a severe public backlash.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-237#cite_note-237\">[196]<\/a><\/sup> After the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dutch_general_election,_2007\" title=\"Dutch general election, 2007\">2007 elections<\/a> she was succeeded by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ronald_Plasterk\" title=\"Ronald Plasterk\">Ronald Plasterk<\/a>, described as a &#8220;molecular geneticist, staunch atheist and opponent of intelligent design&#8221;.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-238#cite_note-238\">[197]<\/a><\/sup> As a reaction on this situation in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Netherlands\" title=\"Netherlands\">Netherlands<\/a>, in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Belgium\" title=\"Belgium\">Belgium<\/a> the President of the Flemish Catholic Educational Board (VSKO) Mieke Van Hecke declared that: &#8220;Catholic scientists already accepted the theory of evolution for a long time and that intelligent design and creationism doesn&#8217;t belong in Flemish Catholic schools. It&#8217;s not the tasks of the politics to introduce new ideas, that&#8217;s task and goal of science.&#8221;<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-239#cite_note-239\">[198]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Relation to Islam<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Muzaffar_Iqbal\" title=\"Muzaffar Iqbal\">Muzaffar Iqbal<\/a>, a notable Muslim in Canada, signed the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/A_Scientific_Dissent_From_Darwinism\" title=\"A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism\">Scientific Dissent<\/a><\/em> list of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-240#cite_note-240\">[199]<\/a><\/sup> Ideas similar to intelligent design have been considered respected intellectual options among Muslims, and in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Turkey\" title=\"Turkey\">Turkey<\/a> many intelligent design books have been translated. In <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Istanbul\" title=\"Istanbul\">Istanbul<\/a> in 2007, public meetings promoting intelligent design were sponsored by the local government,<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-icash-241#cite_note-icash-241\">[200]<\/a><\/sup> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/David_Berlinski\" title=\"David Berlinski\">David Berlinski<\/a> of the Discovery Institute was the keynote speaker at a meeting in May 2007.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-SecurityWatch-242#cite_note-SecurityWatch-242\">[201]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\" lang=\"EN\">Australia<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">The status of intelligent design in Australia is somewhat similar to that in the UK (see: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Education_in_Australia\" title=\"Education in Australia\">Education in Australia<\/a>). When the former Australian Federal Education Minister, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Brendan_Nelson\" title=\"Brendan Nelson\">Brendan Nelson<\/a>, raised the notion of intelligent design being taught in science classes, the public outcry caused the minister to quickly concede that the correct forum for intelligent design, if it were to be taught, is in religious or philosophy classes.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-243#cite_note-243\">[202]<\/a><\/sup> The Australian chapter of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Campus_Crusade_for_Christ\" title=\"Campus Crusade for Christ\">Campus Crusade for Christ<\/a> distributed a DVD of the Discovery Institute&#8217;s documentary <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Unlocking_the_Mystery_of_Life\" title=\"Unlocking the Mystery of Life\">Unlocking the Mystery of Life<\/a><\/em> to Australian secondary schools.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-244#cite_note-244\">[203]<\/a><\/sup> The head of one of Australia&#8217;s leading private schools supported use of the DVD in the classroom at the discretion of teachers and principals.<sup><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_note-245#cite_note-245\">[204]<\/a><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">See also<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span style=\"display: none;\" lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<table class=\"MsoNormalTable\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #f9f9f9;\" border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 0.75pt;\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align: center; line-height: 110%;\" align=\"center\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 0cm 2.4pt;\">\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"line-height: 110%;\"><strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Portal:Creationism\" title=\"Portal:Creationism\">Creationism portal<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Abiogenesis\" title=\"Abiogenesis\">Abiogenesis<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_poor_design\" title=\"Argument from poor design\">Argument from poor design<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Clockwork_universe_theory\" title=\"Clockwork universe theory\">Clockwork universe theory<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cosmological_argument\" title=\"Cosmological argument\">Cosmological argument<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creation_science\" title=\"Creation science\">Creation science<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolution\" title=\"Evolution\">Evolution<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><em><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flock_of_Dodos\" title=\"Flock of Dodos\">Flock of Dodos<\/a><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster\" title=\"Flying Spaghetti Monster\">Flying Spaghetti Monster<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Haldane%27s_dilemma\" title=\"Haldane's dilemma\">Haldane&#8217;s dilemma<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/El_Tejon_Unified_School_District#.27Intelligent_design.27_class\" title=\"El Tejon Unified School District\">&#8216;Intelligent Design&#8217; class ruled illegal<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_falling\" title=\"Intelligent falling\">Intelligent falling<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_works_on_intelligent_design\" title=\"List of works on intelligent design\">List of works on intelligent design<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neo-Creationism\" title=\"Neo-Creationism\">Neo-Creationism<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Old_Earth_creationism\" title=\"Old Earth creationism\">Old Earth creationism<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ra%C3%ABlism#Intelligent_Design\" title=\"Ra\u00eblism\">Ra\u00eblian intelligent design<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Santorum_Amendment\" title=\"Santorum Amendment\">Santorum Amendment<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Watchmaker_analogy\" title=\"Watchmaker analogy\">Watchmaker analogy<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">Notes<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>1.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-DI_engine_3-0#cite_ref-DI_engine_3-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-DI_engine_3-1#cite_ref-DI_engine_3-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <em>&#8220;Q. Has the Discovery Institute been a leader in the intelligent design movement? A. Yes, the Discovery Institute&#8217;s Center for Science and Culture. Q. And are almost all of the individuals who are involved with the intelligent design movement associated with the Discovery Institute? A. All of the leaders are, yes.&#8221;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Barbara_Forrest\" title=\"Barbara Forrest\">Barbara Forrest<\/a>, 2005, testifying in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a> trial. <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/TalkOrigins_Archive\" title=\"TalkOrigins Archive\">TalkOrigins Archive<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/dover\/day6pm.html\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Trial transcript: Day 6 (October 5), PM Session, Part 1.<\/a>; 2005 [cited 2007-07-19].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">&#8220;The Discovery Institute is the ideological and strategic backbone behind the eruption of skirmishes over science in school districts and state capitals across the country&#8221;. In: <span class=\"citation\">Jody Wilgoren. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/08\/21\/national\/21evolve.html\">Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive<\/a>. <em>The New York Times<\/em>. August 21, 2005 [cited 2011-04-20].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/American_Civil_Liberties_Union\" title=\"American Civil Liberties Union\">American Civil Liberties Union<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aclu.org\/religion\/schools\/16371res20050916.html\">Who is behind the ID movement?<\/a>; September 16, 2005 [cited 2007-07-20].<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Kahn, JP. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;program=DI%20Main%20Page%20-%20News&amp;id=2745\">The Evolution of George Gilder. The Author And Tech-Sector Guru Has A New Cause To Create Controversy With: Intelligent Design<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Boston_Globe\" title=\"The Boston Globe\">The Boston Globe<\/a><\/em>. July 27, 2005 [cited 2007-07-19].<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/filesDB-download.php?command=download&amp;id=602\">&#8220;Who&#8217;s Who of Intelligent Design Proponents&#8221;<\/a> (PDF). <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Science_%26_Theology_News\" title=\"Science &amp; Theology News\">Science &amp; Theology News<\/a><\/em>. November 2005<\/span><\/span><span class=\"printonly\"><span lang=\"EN\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/filesDB-download.php?command=download&amp;id=602\">http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/filesDB-download.php?command=download&amp;id=602<\/a><\/span><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\"><span lang=\"EN\">. Retrieved 2007-07-20<\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\"><span lang=\"EN\">.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\" lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">&#8220;The engine behind the ID movement is the Discovery Institute&#8221;. <span class=\"citationjournal\">Attie, Alan D.; Elliot Sober, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ronald_L._Numbers\" title=\"Ronald L. Numbers\">Ronald L. Numbers<\/a>, Richard M. Amasino, Beth Cox4, Terese Berceau, Thomas Powell and Michael M. Cox (2006). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jci.org\/articles\/view\/28449\">&#8220;Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action&#8221;<\/a>. <em>Journal of Clinical Investigation<\/em> (A publication of the American Society for Clinical Investigation.) <strong>116<\/strong> (5): 1134\u20138. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_object_identifier\" title=\"Digital object identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1172%2FJCI28449\">10.1172\/JCI28449<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PubMed_Central\" title=\"PubMed Central\">PMC<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.pubmedcentral.gov\/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&amp;artid=1451210\">1451210<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PubMed_Identifier\" title=\"PubMed Identifier\">PMID<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16670753\">16670753<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jci.org\/articles\/view\/28449\">http:\/\/www.jci.org\/articles\/view\/28449<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-07-20<\/span><span class=\"citationjournal\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>2.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-KvD26_5-0#cite_ref-KvD26_5-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-KvD26_5-1#cite_ref-KvD26_5-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-KvD26_5-2#cite_ref-KvD26_5-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> &#8220;the writings of leading ID proponents reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity&#8221;. <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/2:Context#Page_26_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/2:Context\">Ruling p. 26<\/a>. A selection of writings and quotations of intelligent design supporters demonstrating this identification of the Christian God with the intelligent designer are found in the pdf <a href=\"http:\/\/home.kc.rr.com\/bnpndxtr\/download\/HorsesMouth-BP007.pdf\"><em>Horse&#8217;s Mouth<\/em><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/20080627021627\/http:\/home.kc.rr.com\/bnpndxtr\/download\/HorsesMouth-BP007.pdf\">Archived<\/a> June 27, 2008 at the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wayback_Machine\" title=\"Wayback Machine\">Wayback Machine<\/a> (PDF) by Brian Poindexter, dated 2003. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>3.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-CitizenLink_6-0#cite_ref-CitizenLink_6-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-CitizenLink_6-1#cite_ref-CitizenLink_6-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-CitizenLink_6-2#cite_ref-CitizenLink_6-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_A._Dembski\" title=\"William A. Dembski\">William A. Dembski<\/a>, when asked in an interview whether his research concluded that God is the Intelligent Designer, stated &#8220;I believe God created the world for a purpose. The Designer of intelligent design is, ultimately, the Christian God&#8221;. <span class=\"citationweb\">Devon Williams (December 14, 2007). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.citizenlink.org\/content\/A000006139.cfm\">&#8220;CitizenLink: Friday Five: William A. Dembski&#8221;<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Focus_on_the_Family\" title=\"Focus on the Family\">Focus on the Family<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.citizenlink.org\/content\/A000006139.cfm\">http:\/\/www.citizenlink.org\/content\/A000006139.cfm<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-12-15<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>4.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-8#cite_ref-8\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> See: 1) <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_scientific_societies_explicitly_rejecting_intelligent_design\" title=\"List of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design\">List of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design<\/a> 2) <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_83_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83<\/a>. 3) The Discovery Institute&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/A_Scientific_Dissent_From_Darwinism\" title=\"A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism\">A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism<\/a> petition begun in 2001 has been signed by &#8220;over 700 scientists&#8221; as of August 20, 2006. A four day <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/A_Scientific_Support_for_Darwinism\" title=\"A Scientific Support for Darwinism\">A Scientific Support for Darwinism<\/a> petition gained 7733 signatories from scientists opposing ID. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2002\/1106id2.shtml\">firmly rejects ID<\/a>. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20060115091707\/http:\/www.science.unsw.edu.au\/news\/2005\/intelligent.html\">condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/media\/voices\/science\">List of statements from scientific professional organizations<\/a> on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism. According to <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_New_York_Times\" title=\"The New York Times\">The New York Times<\/a><\/em> &#8220;There is no credible scientific challenge to the theory of evolution as an explanation for the complexity and diversity of life on earth&#8221;. <span class=\"citationnews\">Dean, Cordelia (September 27, 2007). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/09\/27\/science\/27expelled.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin\">&#8220;Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life&#8217;s Origin&#8221;<\/a>. <em>The New York Times<\/em><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/09\/27\/science\/27expelled.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin\">http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/09\/27\/science\/27expelled.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-09-28<\/span><span class=\"citationnews\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>5.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-teachernet_9-0#cite_ref-teachernet_9-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-teachernet_9-1#cite_ref-teachernet_9-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.teachernet.gov.uk\/docbank\/index.cfm?id=11890\">&#8220;Teachernet, Document bank&#8221;<\/a>. <em>Creationism teaching guidance<\/em>. UK Department for Children, Schools and Families. September 18, 2007<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.teachernet.gov.uk\/docbank\/index.cfm?id=11890\">http:\/\/www.teachernet.gov.uk\/docbank\/index.cfm?id=11890<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-10-01<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">. &#8220;The intelligent design movement claims there are aspects of the natural world that are so intricate and fit for purpose that they cannot have evolved but must have been created by an &#8216;intelligent designer&#8217;. Furthermore they assert that this claim is scientifically testable and should therefore be taught in science lessons. Intelligent design lies wholly outside of science. Sometimes examples are quoted that are said to require an &#8216;intelligent designer&#8217;. However, many of these have subsequently been shown to have a scientific explanation, for example, the immune system and blood clotting mechanisms. Attempts to establish an idea of the &#8216;specified complexity&#8217; needed for intelligent design are surrounded by complex mathematics. Despite this, the idea seems to be essentially a modern version of the old idea of the &#8220;God-of-the-gaps&#8221;. Lack of a satisfactory scientific explanation of some phenomena (a &#8216;gap&#8217; in scientific knowledge) is claimed to be evidence of an intelligent designer.&#8221;<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>6.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitzruling-IDandGod_19-0#cite_ref-kitzruling-IDandGod_19-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitzruling-IDandGod_19-1#cite_ref-kitzruling-IDandGod_19-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> &#8220;ID is not a new scientific <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument\" title=\"Argument\">argument<\/a>, but is rather an old religious argument for the existence of God. He traced this argument back to at least Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century, who framed the argument as a syllogism: Wherever complex design exists, there must have been a designer; nature is complex; therefore nature must have had an intelligent designer.&#8221; &#8220;This argument for the existence of God was advanced early in the 19th century by Reverend Paley&#8221; (the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teleological_argument\" title=\"Teleological argument\">teleological argument<\/a>) &#8220;The only apparent difference between the argument made by Paley and the argument for ID, as expressed by defense expert witnesses Behe and Minnich, is that ID&#8217;s &#8216;official position&#8217; does not acknowledge that the designer is God.&#8221; <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/2:Context#Page_24_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/2:Context\">Ruling, p. 24<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>7.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-wedge2_33-0#cite_ref-wedge2_33-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-wedge2_33-1#cite_ref-wedge2_33-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> Phillip Johnson: <em>&#8220;Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit so that we can get the issue of Intelligent Design, which really means the reality of God, before the academic world and into the schools.&#8221;<\/em> Johnson 2004. Christianity.ca. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.christianity.ca\/news\/social-issues\/2004\/03.001.html\">Let&#8217;s Be Intelligent About Darwin<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/20070608233455\/http:\/www.christianity.ca\/news\/social-issues\/2004\/03.001.html\">Archived<\/a> June 8, 2007 at the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wayback_Machine\" title=\"Wayback Machine\">Wayback Machine<\/a>. <em>&#8220;This isn&#8217;t really, and never has been a debate about science. It&#8217;s about religion and philosophy.&#8221;<\/em> Johnson 1996. <em>World<\/em> magazine. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.leaderu.com\/pjohnson\/world2.html\">Witnesses For The Prosecution<\/a>. <em>&#8220;So the question is: &#8220;How to win?&#8221; That&#8217;s when I began to develop what you now see full-fledged in the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wedge_strategy\" title=\"Wedge strategy\">&#8220;wedge&#8221; strategy<\/a>: &#8220;Stick with the most important thing&#8221;\u2014the mechanism and the building up of information. Get the Bible and the Book of Genesis out of the debate because you do not want to raise the so-called Bible-science dichotomy. Phrase the argument in such a way that you can get it heard in the secular academy and in a way that tends to unify the religious dissenters. That means concentrating on, &#8220;Do you need a Creator to do the creating, or can nature do it on its own?&#8221; and refusing to get sidetracked onto other issues, which people are always trying to do.&#8221;<\/em> Johnson 2000. Touchstone magazine. <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/20070609033219\/http:\/www.touchstonemag.com\/docs\/issues\/15.5docs\/15-5pg40.html\">Berkeley&#8217;s Radical An Interview with Phillip E. Johnson<\/a> at the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wayback_Machine\" title=\"Wayback Machine\">Wayback Machine<\/a> (<em>archived June 9, 2007<\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>8.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-34#cite_ref-34\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stephen_C._Meyer\" title=\"Stephen C. Meyer\">Stephen C. Meyer<\/a>: &#8220;I think the designer is God\u00a0&#8230;&#8221; (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.bringyou.to\/apologetics\/p90.htm\">Darwin, the marketing of Intelligent Design<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nightline\" title=\"Nightline\">Nightline<\/a><\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/ABC_News\" title=\"ABC News\">ABC News<\/a>, with <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ted_Koppel\" title=\"Ted Koppel\">Ted Koppel<\/a>, August 10, 2005); <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nancy_Pearcey\" title=\"Nancy Pearcey\">Nancy Pearcey<\/a>: &#8220;By contrast, design theory demonstrates that Christians can sit in the supernaturalist&#8217;s &#8220;chair&#8221; even in their professional lives, seeing the cosmos through the lens of a comprehensive biblical worldview. Intelligent Design steps boldly into the scientific arena to build a case based on empirical data. It takes Christianity out of the ineffectual realm of value and stakes out a cognitive claim in the realm of objective truth. It restores Christianity to its status as genuine knowledge, equipping us to defend it in the public arena&#8221;. (<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20061028204903\/http:\/rightreason.ektopos.com\/archives\/2005\/09\/why_sciencetype.html\"><em>Total Truth<\/em><\/a>, Crossway Books, June 29, 2004, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/1581344589\">ISBN 1-58134-458-9<\/a>, pp. 204\u2013205) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>9.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-55#cite_ref-55\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> For example, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/cgi\/content\/abstract\/312\/5770\/97\">Bridgham <em>et al.<\/em><\/a> showed that gradual evolutionary mechanisms can produce complex protein-protein interaction systems from simpler precursors. <span class=\"citation\">Bridgham <em>et al.<\/em>. Evolution of Hormone-Receptor Complexity by Molecular Exploitation. <em>Science<\/em>. 2006;312(5770):97\u2013101. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1126%2Fscience.1123348\">10.1126\/science.1123348<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16601189\">PMID 16601189<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>10.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-56#cite_ref-56\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/archive\/2005\/05\/30\/050530fa_fact\">Devolution<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_New_Yorker\" title=\"The New Yorker\">The New Yorker<\/a><\/em>. May 30, 2005.<\/span> This article draws from the following exchange of letters in which Behe admits to sloppy prose and non-logical proof: <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?program=CRSC%20Responses&amp;command=view&amp;id=1406\">Has Darwin met his match? Letters\u2014An exchange over ID<\/a>; March 26, 2003 [cited 2006-11-30].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>11.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-61#cite_ref-61\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Some of Dembski&#8217;s responses to assertions of specified complexity being a tautology can be found at <span class=\"citationweb\">William A. Dembski. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/dembski\/wd_anotherwaytodetectdesign.htm\">&#8220;Another way to detect design&#8221;<\/a>. ARN<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/dembski\/wd_anotherwaytodetectdesign.htm\">http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/dembski\/wd_anotherwaytodetectdesign.htm<\/a><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>12.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-74#cite_ref-74\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Dembski. Discovery Institute. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/csc\/topQuestions.php#questionsAboutIntelligentDesign\">Questions About Intelligent Design<\/a>. &#8220;The theory of Intelligent Design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.<em>&#8220;<\/em><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>13.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-78#cite_ref-78\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> IDEA <em>&#8220;One need not fully understand the origin or identity of the designer to determine that an object was designed. Thus, this question is essentially irrelevant to intelligent design theory, which merely seeks to detect if an object was designed &#8230; Intelligent design theory cannot address the identity or origin of the designer\u2014it is a philosophical \/ religious question that lies outside the domain of scientific inquiry. Christianity postulates the religious answer to this question that the designer is God who by definition is eternally existent and has no origin. There is no logical philosophical impossibility with this being the case (akin to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Aristotle\" title=\"Aristotle\">Aristotle<\/a>&#8216;s &#8216;unmoved mover&#8217;) as a religious answer to the origin of the designer&#8230;&#8221;<\/em> FAQ: Who designed the designer? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ideacenter.org\/contentmgr\/showdetails.php\/id\/1147\">FAQ: Who designed the designer?<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>14.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-aaas_84-0#cite_ref-aaas_84-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-aaas_84-1#cite_ref-aaas_84-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/American_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Science\" title=\"American Association for the Advancement of Science\">American Association for the Advancement of Science<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/spp\/sfrl\/per\/per26.pdf\">Professional Ethics Report<\/a> [PDF]; 2001. &#8220;Creationists are repackaging their message as the pseudoscience of intelligent design theory.&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>15.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-90#cite_ref-90\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_T._Pennock\" title=\"Robert T. Pennock\">Robert T. Pennock<\/a>. Wizards of ID: Reply to Dembski. In: Robert T. Pennock. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.metanexus.net\/magazine\/ArticleDetail\/tabid\/68\/id\/2645\/Default.aspx\">Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives<\/a><\/em>. Cambridge, Massachusetts: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/MIT_Press\" title=\"MIT Press\">MIT Press<\/a>; 2001. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0262661241\">ISBN 0-262-66124-1<\/a>. &#8220;<em>Dembski chides me for never using the term &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; without conjoining it to &#8220;creationism&#8221;. He implies (though never explicitly asserts) that he and others in his movement are not creationists and that it is incorrect to discuss them in such terms, suggesting that doing so is merely a rhetorical ploy to &#8220;rally the troops&#8221;. (2) Am I (and the many others who see Dembski&#8217;s movement in the same way) misrepresenting their position? The basic notion of creationism is the rejection of biological evolution in favor of special creation, where the latter is understood to be supernatural. Beyond this there is considerable variability&#8230;<\/em>&#8221; p. 645\u2013667.<\/span>; <span class=\"citation\">Pennock, Robert T.. <em>Tower of Babel: Evidence Against the New Creationism<\/em>. Cambridge, Massachusetts: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/MIT_Press\" title=\"MIT Press\">MIT Press<\/a>; 1999.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>16.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-wedge_doc_92-0#cite_ref-wedge_doc_92-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-wedge_doc_92-1#cite_ref-wedge_doc_92-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-wedge_doc_92-2#cite_ref-wedge_doc_92-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <em>&#8220;The social consequences of materialism have been devastating. As symptoms, those consequences are certainly worth treating. However, we are convinced that in order to defeat materialism, we must cut it off at its source. That source is scientific materialism. This is precisely our strategy. If we view the predominant materialistic science as a giant tree, our strategy is intended to function as a &#8216;wedge&#8217; that, while relatively small, can split the trunk when applied at its weakest points. The very beginning of this strategy, the &#8216;thin edge of the wedge,&#8217; was Phillip Johnson&#8217;s critique of Darwinism begun in 1991 in Darwinism on Trial, and continued in Reason in the Balance and Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds. Michael Behe&#8217;s highly successful Darwin&#8217;s Black Box followed Johnson&#8217;s work. We are building on this momentum, broadening the wedge with a positive scientific alternative to materialistic scientific theories, which has come to be called the theory of intelligent design (ID). Design theory promises to reverse the stifling dominance of the materialist worldview, and to replace it with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions&#8221;.<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antievolution.org\/features\/wedge.pdf\">Wedge Document<\/a> Discovery Institute, 1999. (PDF file) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>17.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-PJC_93-0#cite_ref-PJC_93-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-PJC_93-1#cite_ref-PJC_93-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-PJC_93-2#cite_ref-PJC_93-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <em>&#8220;I have built an intellectual movement in the universities and churches that we call The Wedge, which is devoted to scholarship and writing that furthers this program of questioning the materialistic basis of science. [&#8230;] Now the way that I see the logic of our movement going is like this. The first thing you understand is that the Darwinian theory isn&#8217;t true. It&#8217;s falsified by all of the evidence and the logic is terrible. When you realize that, the next question that occurs to you is, well, where might you get the truth? [&#8230;] I start with John 1:1. In the beginning was the word. In the beginning was intelligence, purpose, and wisdom. The Bible had that right. And the materialist scientists are deluding themselves.&#8221;<\/em> Johnson 1999. Reclaiming America for Christ Conference. <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20071107005414\/http:\/www.coralridge.org\/specialdocs\/evolutiondebate.asp\">How the Evolution Debate Can Be Won<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>18.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-IDstatementOnCreator_96-0#cite_ref-IDstatementOnCreator_96-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-IDstatementOnCreator_96-1#cite_ref-IDstatementOnCreator_96-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> &#8220;&#8230;intelligent design does not address metaphysical and religious questions such as the nature or identity of the designer,&#8221; and &#8220;&#8230;the nature, moral character and purposes of this intelligence lie beyond the competence of science and must be left to religion and philosophy&#8221;. In: <span class=\"citation\">Discovery Institute. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/filesDB-download.php?command=download&amp;id=565\"><em>Truth Sheet # 09-05 Does intelligent design postulate a &#8220;supernatural creator?<\/em><\/a> [cited 2007-07-19].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>19.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-97#cite_ref-97\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Phillip Johnson. &#8216;Keeping the Darwinists Honest&#8217; an interview with Phillip Johnson. 1999.<\/span> <em>&#8220;Intelligent Design is an intellectual movement, and the Wedge strategy stops working when we are seen as just another way of packaging the Christian evangelical message. [&#8230;] The evangelists do what they do very well, and I hope our work opens up for them some doors that have been closed&#8221;.<\/em> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>20.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Johnson-Touchstone_98-0#cite_ref-Johnson-Touchstone_98-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Johnson-Touchstone_98-1#cite_ref-Johnson-Touchstone_98-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Phillip Johnson. <em>Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity<\/em>. 1999.<\/span> <em>&#8220;&#8230;the first thing that has to be done is to get the Bible out of the discussion&#8230;. This is not to say that the biblical issues are unimportant; the point is rather that the time to address them will be after we have separated materialist prejudice from scientific fact&#8221;.<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/johnson\/le_wedge.htm\">The Wedge<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>21.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-102#cite_ref-102\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Barbara Forrest. Expert Testimony. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/em> trial transcript, Day 6 (October 5) <em>&#8220;What I am talking about is the essence of intelligent design, and the essence of it is theistic realism as defined by Professor Johnson. Now that stands on its own quite apart from what their motives are. I&#8217;m also talking about the definition of intelligent design by Dr. Dembski as the Logos theology of John&#8217;s Gospel. That stands on its own. [&#8230;] Intelligent design, as it is understood by the proponents that we are discussing today, does involve a supernatural creator, and that is my objection. And I am objecting to it as they have defined it, as Professor Johnson has defined intelligent design, and as Dr. Dembski has defined intelligent design. And both of those are basically religious. They involve the supernatural&#8221;.<\/em> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>22.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Findelsteinpollreport_112-0#cite_ref-Findelsteinpollreport_112-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> According to the poll, 18% of the physicians believed that God created humans exactly as they appear today. Another 42% believed that God initiated and guided an evolutionary process that has led to current human beings. The poll also found that &#8220;an overwhelming majority of Jewish doctors (83%) and half of Catholic doctors (51%) believe that intelligent design is simply &#8220;a religiously inspired pseudo-science rather than a legitimate scientific speculation&#8221;. The poll also found that &#8220;more than half of Protestant doctors (63%) believe that intelligent design is a &#8220;legitimate scientific speculation&#8221;.<br \/> <span class=\"citationpressrelease\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hcdi.net\/News\/PressRelease.cfm?ID=93\">&#8220;Majority of Physicians Give the Nod to Evolution Over Intelligent Design&#8221;<\/a> (Press release)<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hcdi.net\/News\/PressRelease.cfm?ID=93\">http:\/\/www.hcdi.net\/News\/PressRelease.cfm?ID=93<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-10-08<\/span><span class=\"citationpressrelease\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>23.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Johnsonconversation_129-0#cite_ref-Johnsonconversation_129-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Phillip E. Johnson. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Access_Research_Network\" title=\"Access Research Network\">Access Research Network<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/johnson\/ratzsch.htm\">Starting a Conversation about Evolution: Johnson, Phillip<\/a>; August 31, 1996 [cited 2008-10-18]. &#8220;My colleagues and I speak of &#8216;theistic realism&#8217;\u2014or sometimes, &#8216;mere creation&#8217;\u2014as the defining concept of our [the ID] movement. This means that we affirm that God is objectively real as Creator, and that the reality of God is tangibly recorded in evidence accessible to science, particularly in biology.&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>24.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Watanabe_131-0#cite_ref-Watanabe_131-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Watanabe_131-1#cite_ref-Watanabe_131-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?programs=CSCstories&amp;command=view&amp;id=613\">Enlisting Science to Find the Fingerprints of a Creator<\/a>; March 25, 2001 [cited 2007-07-22]. &#8220;[Phillip E. Johnson quoted]: We are taking an intuition most people have and making it a scientific and academic enterprise&#8230;. We are removing the most important cultural roadblock to accepting the role of God as creator.&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>25.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-133#cite_ref-133\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.christianity.ca\/news\/social-issues\/2004\/03.001.html\">Let&#8217;s Be Intelligent About Darwin<\/a>; January 10, 2003 [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20070608233455\/http:\/www.christianity.ca\/news\/social-issues\/2004\/03.001.html\">archived<\/a> 2007-06-08; cited 2007-07-23]. &#8220;[Phillip E. Johnson quoted]: Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit so that we can get the issue of Intelligent Design, which really means the reality of God, before the academic world and into the schools.&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>26.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-159#cite_ref-159\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> National Science Teachers Association, a professional association of 55,000 science teachers and administrators <span class=\"citationpressrelease\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsta.org\/about\/pressroom.aspx?id=50794\">&#8220;National Science Teachers Association Disappointed About Intelligent Design Comments Made by President Bush&#8221;<\/a> (Press release). National Science Teachers Association. August 3, 2005<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsta.org\/about\/pressroom.aspx?id=50794\">http:\/\/www.nsta.org\/about\/pressroom.aspx?id=50794<\/a><\/span><span class=\"citationpressrelease\">. &#8220;We stand with the nation&#8217;s leading scientific organizations and scientists, including Dr. John Marburger, the president&#8217;s top science advisor, in stating that intelligent design is not science&#8230;.It is simply not fair to present pseudoscience to students in the science classroom.&#8221;<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>27.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-160#cite_ref-160\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Evolution critics seek role for unseen hand in education. <em>Nature<\/em>. 2002;416(6878):250. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1038%2F416250a\">10.1038\/416250a<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/11907537\">PMID 11907537<\/a>. &#8220;But many scientists regard &#8216;intelligent design&#8217; as pseudoscience, and say that it is being used as a Trojan Horse to introduce the teaching of creationism into schools&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>28.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-161#cite_ref-161\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Attie, A. D.. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jci.org\/articles\/view\/28449\">Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action<\/a>. <em>Journal of Clinical Investigation<\/em>. 2006;116(5):1134\u20131138. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1172%2FJCI28449\">10.1172\/JCI28449<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16670753\">PMID 16670753<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PubMed_Central\" title=\"PubMed Central\">PMC<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC1451210\/\">1451210<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">H. Allen Orr. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/archive\/2005\/05\/30\/050530fa_fact\">Devolution\u2014Why intelligent design isn&#8217;t<\/a>; 2005 May. &#8220;Biologists aren&#8217;t alarmed by intelligent design&#8217;s arrival in Dover and elsewhere because they have all sworn allegiance to atheistic materialism; they&#8217;re alarmed because intelligent design is junk science.&#8221;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_T._Pennock\" title=\"Robert T. Pennock\">Robert T. Pennock<\/a> Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Mark Bergin. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldmag.com\/articles\/11553\">Junk science<\/a>; February 25, 2006.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>29.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-163#cite_ref-163\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><em>Scientific Method in Practice<\/em>. Cambridge UP; 2003. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0521017084\">ISBN 0-521-01708-4<\/a>. Chapters 5\u20138.<\/span> Discusses principles of induction, deduction and probability related to the expectation of consistency, testability, and multiple observations. Chapter 8 discusses parsimony (Occam&#8217;s razor) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>30.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitzruling_pg64_165-0#cite_ref-kitzruling_pg64_165-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_64_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">4: whether ID is science<\/a>. The ruling discusses central aspects of expectations in the scientific community that a scientific theory be <em>testable, dynamic, correctible, progressive, based upon multiple observations, and provisional<\/em>, <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>31.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-167#cite_ref-167\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Intelligent design fails to pass Occam&#8217;s razor. Adding entities (an intelligent agent, a designer) to the equation is not strictly necessary to explain events. See, e.g., <span class=\"citation\">Branden Fitelson, <em>et al.<\/em>. How Not to Detect Design\u2013Critical Notice: William A. Dembski <em>The Design Inference<\/em>. In: Robert T. Pennock. <em>Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives<\/em>. MIT Press; 2001. p. 597\u2013616.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>32.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-168#cite_ref-168\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> See, e.g., <span class=\"citation\">Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lehigh.edu\/%7Einbios\/schneider\/evolution.htm\">Thoughts on Evolution and Intelligent Design<\/a>; 2005. &#8220;Q: Why couldn&#8217;t intelligent design also be a scientific theory? A: The idea of intelligent design might or might not be true, but when presented as a scientific hypothesis, it is not useful because it is based on weak assumptions, lacks supporting data and terminates further thought.&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>33.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-169#cite_ref-169\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> The designer is not falsifiable, since its existence is typically asserted without sufficient conditions to allow a falsifying observation. The designer being beyond the realm of the observable, claims about its existence can be neither supported nor undermined by observation, making intelligent design and the argument from design analytic <em>a posteriori<\/em> arguments. See, e.g., <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/2:Context#Page_22_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/2:Context\">Ruling, p. 22<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_77_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">p. 77<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>34.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-170#cite_ref-170\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> That intelligent design is not empirically testable stems from the fact that it violates a basic premise of science, naturalism. See, e.g., <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/2:Context#Page_22_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/2:Context\">Ruling, p. 22<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_66_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">p. 66<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>35.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-171#cite_ref-171\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Intelligent design professes to offer an answer that does not need to be defined or explained, the intelligent agent, designer. By asserting a conclusion that cannot be accounted for scientifically, <em>the designer<\/em>, intelligent design cannot be sustained by any further explanation, and objections raised to those who accept intelligent design make little headway. Thus intelligent design is not a provisional assessment of data, which can change when new information is discovered. Once it is claimed that a conclusion that need not be accounted for has been established, there is simply no possibility of future correction. The idea of the progressive growth of scientific ideas is required to explain previous data and any previously unexplainable data. See, e.g., the brief explanation in <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_66_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">p. 66<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>36.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-172#cite_ref-172\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/media.ljworld.com\/pdf\/2005\/09\/15\/nobel_letter.pdf\">&#8220;Nobel Laureates Initiative&#8221;<\/a> (PDF). The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity. September 9, 2005<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ljworld.com\/pdf\/2005\/09\/15\/nobel_letter.pdf\">http:\/\/media.ljworld.com\/pdf\/2005\/09\/15\/nobel_letter.pdf<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-07-19<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> The September 2005 statement by 38 <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nobel_Prize\" title=\"Nobel Prize\">Nobel laureates<\/a> stated that: &#8220;Intelligent design is fundamentally unscientific; it cannot be tested as scientific theory because its central conclusion is based on belief in the intervention of a supernatural agent&#8221;. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>37.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-173#cite_ref-173\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.science.unsw.edu.au\/news\/2005\/intelligent.html\">Intelligent Design is not Science: Scientists and teachers speak out<\/a>. 2005 October [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20060614003243\/http:\/www.science.unsw.edu.au\/news\/2005\/intelligent.html\">archived<\/a> 2006-06-14; cited 2009-01-09]. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_New_South_Wales\" title=\"University of New South Wales\">University of New South Wales<\/a>.<\/span> The October 2005 statement, by a coalition representing more than 70,000 Australian scientists and science teachers said: &#8220;intelligent design is not science&#8221; and called on &#8220;all schools not to teach Intelligent Design (ID) as science, because it fails to qualify on every count as a scientific theory&#8221;. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>38.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-187#cite_ref-187\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sternberg_peer_review_controversy\" title=\"Sternberg peer review controversy\">Sternberg peer review controversy<\/a> and several similar academic disputes are the subject of the 2008 documentary &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed\" title=\"Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed\">Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed<\/a>&#8220;. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>39.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-196#cite_ref-196\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/lawreview.wustl.edu\/inprint\/83-1\/p%201%20Brauer%20Forrest%20Gey%20book%20pages.pdf\">Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution<\/a> [PDF]. <em>Washington University Law Quarterly<\/em>. 2005 [cited 2007-07-18];83(1). &#8220;ID leaders know the benefits of submitting their work to independent review and have established at least two purportedly &#8220;peer-reviewed&#8221; journals for ID articles. However, one has languished for want of material and quietly ceased publication, while the other has a more overtly philosophical orientation. Both journals employ a weak standard of &#8220;peer review&#8221; that amounts to no more than vetting by the editorial board or society fellows.&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>40.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-197#cite_ref-197\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/TalkOrigins_Archive\" title=\"TalkOrigins Archive\">TalkOrigins Archive<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/indexcc\/CI\/CI001_4.html\">Index to Creationist Claims<\/a>; 2006. &#8220;With some of the claims for peer review, notably Campbell and Meyer (2003) and the e-journal PCID, the reviewers are themselves ardent supporters of intelligent design. The purpose of peer review is to expose errors, weaknesses, and significant omissions in fact and argument. That purpose is not served if the reviewers are uncritical&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>41.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-200#cite_ref-200\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> &#8220;For human artifacts, we know the designer&#8217;s identity, human, and the mechanism of design, as we have experience based upon empirical evidence that humans can make such things, as well as many other attributes including the designer&#8217;s abilities, needs, and desires. With ID, proponents assert that they refuse to propose hypotheses on the designer&#8217;s identity, do not propose a mechanism, and the designer, he\/she\/it\/they, has never been seen. In that vein, defense expert Professor Minnich agreed that in the case of human artifacts and objects, we know the identity and capacities of the human designer, but we do not know any of those attributes for the designer of biological life. In addition, Professor Behe agreed that for the design of human artifacts, we know the designer and its attributes and we have a baseline for human design that does not exist for design of biological systems. Professor Behe&#8217;s only response to these seemingly insurmountable points of disanalogy was that the inference still works in science fiction movies&#8221;.\u2014<cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_81_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">p. 81<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>42.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-224#cite_ref-224\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Illustra Media. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.illustramedia.com\/ID01WiredMagPage.htm\">WIRED Magazine response<\/a> [cited 2007-07-13]. &#8220;It&#8217;s also important that you read a well developed rebuttal to Wired&#8217;s misleading accusations. Links to both the article and a response by the Discovery Institute (our partners in the production of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Unlocking_the_Mystery_of_Life\" title=\"Unlocking the Mystery of Life\">Unlocking the Mystery of Life<\/a> and The Privileged Planet)&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">References<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\"><span>1.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-DI-topquestions_0-0#cite_ref-DI-topquestions_0-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-DI-topquestions_0-1#cite_ref-DI-topquestions_0-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/csc\/topQuestions.php#questionsAboutIntelligentDesign\">Top Questions-1.What is the theory of intelligent design?<\/a> [cited 2007-05-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>2.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-1#cite_ref-1\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ideacenter.org\/stuff\/contentmgr\/files\/393410a2d36e9b96329c2faff7e2a4df\/miscdocs\/intelligentdesigntheoryinanutshell.pdf\">Primer: Intelligent Design Theory in a Nutshell<\/a> [PDF]; 2004 [cited 2007-05-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Intelligent Design network. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org\/\">Intelligent Design<\/a>; 2007 [cited 2007-05-13].<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>3.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-2#cite_ref-2\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Creationists\" title=\"The Creationists\">The Creationists<\/a>, Expanded Edition<\/em>. Harvard University Press; 2006. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0674023390\">ISBN 0-674-02339-0<\/a>. p. 373, 379\u2013380.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>4.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-4#cite_ref-4\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/spp\/dser\/03_Areas\/evolution\/issues\/peerreview.shtml\">&#8220;Science and Policy: Intelligent Design and Peer Review&#8221;<\/a>. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2007<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/spp\/dser\/03_Areas\/evolution\/issues\/peerreview.shtml\">http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/spp\/dser\/03_Areas\/evolution\/issues\/peerreview.shtml<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-07-19<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>5.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-discovery_7-0#cite_ref-discovery_7-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-discovery_7-1#cite_ref-discovery_7-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citationweb\">Stephen C. Meyer and Paul A. Nelson (May 1, 1996). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;id=1685\">&#8220;CSC \u2013 Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules<\/a>, A book review, Origins &amp; Design&#8221;]<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;id=1685\">http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;id=1685<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-05-20<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\"><span lang=\"EN\">Phillip E. Johnson (August 31, 1996). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/johnson\/ratzsch.htm\">&#8220;Starting a Conversation about Evolution&#8221;<\/a>. <em>Phillip Johnson Files<\/em>. Access Research Network<\/span><\/span><span class=\"printonly\"><span lang=\"EN\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/johnson\/ratzsch.htm\">http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/johnson\/ratzsch.htm<\/a><\/span><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\"><span lang=\"EN\">. Retrieved 2007-05-20<\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\"><span lang=\"EN\">.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\" lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\"><span lang=\"EN\">Stephen C. Meyer (December 1, 2002). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;id=1780\">&#8220;The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design: The Methodological Equivalence of Naturalistic and Non-Naturalistic Origins Theories&#8221;<\/a>. Ignatius Press<\/span><\/span><span class=\"printonly\"><span lang=\"EN\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;id=1780\">http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;id=1780<\/a><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\"><span lang=\"EN\">.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\" lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><cite><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/span><\/cite><span lang=\"EN\">, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_66_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">Whether ID Is Science<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><cite><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/span><\/cite><span lang=\"EN\">, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_68_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">Lead defense expert Professor Behe admitted that his broadened definition of science, which encompasses ID, would also include astrology<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">See also <span class=\"citationnews\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/ap\/2007\/02\/13\/america\/NA-GEN-US-Kansas-Evolution-History.php\">&#8220;Evolution of Kansas science standards continues as Darwin&#8217;s theories regain prominence&#8221;<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Herald_Tribune\" title=\"International Herald Tribune\">International Herald Tribune<\/a><\/em>. February 13, 2007<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/ap\/2007\/02\/13\/america\/NA-GEN-US-Kansas-Evolution-History.php\">http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/ap\/2007\/02\/13\/america\/NA-GEN-US-Kansas-Evolution-History.php<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-05-20<\/span><span class=\"citationnews\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>6.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-10#cite_ref-10\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Nature Methods Editorial. An intelligently designed response. <em>Nat. Methods<\/em>. 2007;4(12):983. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1038%2Fnmeth1207-983\">10.1038\/nmeth1207-983<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>7.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-11#cite_ref-11\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Mark Greener. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2267227\/\">Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?<\/a>. <em>EMBO Reports<\/em>. 2007;8(12):1107\u20131109. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1038%2Fsj.embor.7401131\">10.1038\/sj.embor.7401131<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/18059309\">PMID 18059309<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>8.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-reducibly_complex_mousetrap_12-0#cite_ref-reducibly_complex_mousetrap_12-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-reducibly_complex_mousetrap_12-1#cite_ref-reducibly_complex_mousetrap_12-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> John H. McDonald&#8217;s &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/udel.edu\/%7Emcdonald\/mousetrap.html\">reducibly complex mousetrap<\/a>&#8221; <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>9.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-cbs.dtu.dk_13-0#cite_ref-cbs.dtu.dk_13-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-cbs.dtu.dk_13-1#cite_ref-cbs.dtu.dk_13-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> David Ussery, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbs.dtu.dk\/staff\/dave\/Behe.html\">A Biochemist&#8217;s Response to &#8216;The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution&#8217;<\/a>&#8221; <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>10.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Kitzmiller_v_p._64_14-0#cite_ref-Kitzmiller_v_p._64_14-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Kitzmiller_v_p._64_14-1#cite_ref-Kitzmiller_v_p._64_14-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#4._Whether_ID_is_Science\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">p. 64<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>11.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-talkorigins.org_15-0#cite_ref-talkorigins.org_15-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-talkorigins.org_15-1#cite_ref-talkorigins.org_15-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Rich Baldwin. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/information\/dembski.html\">Information Theory and Creationism<\/a>; 2005.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>12.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-16#cite_ref-16\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Mark Perakh. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkreason.org\/articles\/newmath.cfm\">Dembski &#8216;displaces Darwinism&#8217; mathematically &#8212; or does he?<\/a>; 2005.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>13.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-math.jmu.edu_17-0#cite_ref-math.jmu.edu_17-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-math.jmu.edu_17-1#cite_ref-math.jmu.edu_17-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Jason Rosenhouse. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.jmu.edu\/%7Erosenhjd\/sewell.pdf\">How Anti-Evolutionists Abuse Mathematics<\/a> [PDF]. <em>The Mathematical Intelligencer<\/em>. Fall 2001;23(4):3\u20138.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>14.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitz21_18-0#cite_ref-kitz21_18-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/2:Context#Page_32_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/2:Context\">Context pg. 32 <em>ff<\/em><\/a>, citing <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Edwards_v._Aguillard\" title=\"Edwards v. Aguillard\">Edwards v. Aguillard<\/a><\/cite>, <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&amp;court=US&amp;vol=482&amp;page=578\">482 U.S. 578<\/a> (1987). <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>15.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-ForrestMayPaper_20-0#cite_ref-ForrestMayPaper_20-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-ForrestMayPaper_20-1#cite_ref-ForrestMayPaper_20-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-ForrestMayPaper_20-2#cite_ref-ForrestMayPaper_20-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-ForrestMayPaper_20-3#cite_ref-ForrestMayPaper_20-3\"><strong><em><sup>d<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Washington,_D.C.\" title=\"Washington, D.C.\">Washington, D.C.<\/a>: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Inquiry\" title=\"Center for Inquiry\">Center for Inquiry<\/a>, Office of Public Policy. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.centerforinquiry.net\/uploads\/attachments\/intelligent-design.pdf\">Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals.<\/a> [PDF]; 2007 May [cited 2007-08-06].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>16.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitz31_21-0#cite_ref-kitz31_21-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitz31_21-1#cite_ref-kitz31_21-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/2:Context#Page_31_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/2:Context\">pp. 31\u201333<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>17.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-22#cite_ref-22\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Discovery Institute. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;id=2190\">Media Backgrounder: Intelligent Design Article Sparks Controversy<\/a>; September 7, 2004.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">James M. Kushiner. <a href=\"http:\/\/touchstonemag.com\/archives\/article.php?id=15-05-037-i\">Berkeley&#8217;s Radical<\/a>; 2002 June.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Jodi Wilgoren. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msu.edu\/course\/te\/407\/FS05Sec3\/te408\/files\/Politicized%20Scholars%20Put%20Evolution%20on%20the%20Defensive%20-%20New%20York%20Times.pdf\">Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive<\/a> [PDF].. August 21, 2005.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/seattleweekly.com\/2006-02-01\/news\/discovery-s-creation.php\">Discovery&#8217;s Creation<\/a>. <em>Seattle Weekly<\/em>. February 1, 2006 [cited 2007-07-27].<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>18.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-23#cite_ref-23\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/6:Curriculum,_Conclusion#Page_136_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/6:Curriculum, Conclusion\">Conclusion of Ruling<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>19.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-24#cite_ref-24\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">R.T., Pennock, (2000). <em>Tower of Babel: the evidence against the new creationism<\/em>. City: MIT Press. pp.\u00a060, 68\u201370, 242\u2013245. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0-262-66165-9\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/0-262-66165-9\">0-262-66165-9<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><br \/> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/2:Context#Page_24_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/2:Context\">Ruling pp. 24\u201325<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>20.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-PM_09_25-0#cite_ref-PM_09_25-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-PM_09_25-1#cite_ref-PM_09_25-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citationjournal\">Padian, K.; Matzke, N. (2009). &#8220;Darwin, Dover, \u2018Intelligent Design\u2019 and textbooks&#8221;. <em>Biochemical Journal<\/em> <strong>417<\/strong> (1): 29. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_object_identifier\" title=\"Digital object identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1042%2Fbj20081534\">10.1042\/bj20081534<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PubMed_Identifier\" title=\"PubMed Identifier\">PMID<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/19061485\">19061485<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"plainlinksnoprint\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Template:Cite_doi\/10.1042.2Fbj20081534&amp;action=edit&amp;editintro=Template:Cite_doi\/editintro2\">edit<\/a><\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biochemj.org\/bj\/417\/0029\/4170029.pdf\">.pdf<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>21.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-SM_07_26-0#cite_ref-SM_07_26-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-SM_07_26-1#cite_ref-SM_07_26-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-SM_07_26-2#cite_ref-SM_07_26-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Eugenie C. Scott. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pnas.org\/content\/104\/suppl.1\/8669.full\">Biological design in science classrooms<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Proceedings_of_the_National_Academy_of_Sciences\" title=\"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/a><\/em>. May 15, 2007 [cited 2009-06-02];104(Suppl 1):8669\u20138676. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1073%2Fpnas.0701505104\">10.1073\/pnas.0701505104<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/17494747\">PMID 17494747<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PubMed_Central\" title=\"PubMed Central\">PMC<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC1876445\/\">1876445<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>22.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Pennock_245_27-0#cite_ref-Pennock_245_27-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Pennock_245_27-1#cite_ref-Pennock_245_27-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citationbook\">R.T., Pennock, (2000). <em>Tower of Babel: the evidence against the new creationism<\/em>. City: MIT Press. pp.\u00a0245\u2013249, 265, 296\u2013300. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0-262-66165-9\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/0-262-66165-9\">0-262-66165-9<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>23.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-28#cite_ref-28\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Forrest, Barbara. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2006\/3\/11\/8448\/52824\">Know Your Creationists: Know Your Allies<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>24.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-meyermolo_29-0#cite_ref-meyermolo_29-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-meyermolo_29-1#cite_ref-meyermolo_29-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Stephen C. Meyer. Access Research Network. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/docs\/meyer\/sm_notalone.htm\">We Are Not Alone<\/a>; 1986 March [cited 2007-10-10].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>25.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-30#cite_ref-30\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Charles B. Thaxton, Ph.D.. Christian Leadership Ministries. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.origins.org\/articles\/thaxton_dnadesign.html\">DNA, Design and the Origin of Life<\/a>; November 13\u201316, 1986 [cited 2007-10-10].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>26.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-picshb_31-0#cite_ref-picshb_31-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-picshb_31-1#cite_ref-picshb_31-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Charles B. Thaxton. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.leaderu.com\/offices\/thaxton\/docs\/inpursuit.html\">In Pursuit of Intelligent Causes: Some Historical Background<\/a>; June 23\u201326, 1988, revised July 1988 and May 1991 [cited 2007-10-06].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>27.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-dembski_logos_32-0#cite_ref-dembski_logos_32-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-dembski_logos_32-1#cite_ref-dembski_logos_32-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-dembski_logos_32-2#cite_ref-dembski_logos_32-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> Dembski: <em>&#8220;Intelligent design is just the Logos theology of John&#8217;s Gospel restated in the idiom of information theory,&#8221;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/touchstonemag.com\/archives\/issue.php?id=49\">Touchstone Magazine. Volume 12, Issue 4: July\u2013August, 1999<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>28.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-RethinkingSchools_35-0#cite_ref-RethinkingSchools_35-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-RethinkingSchools_35-1#cite_ref-RethinkingSchools_35-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Leon Lynn. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rethinkingschools.org\/archive\/12_02\/panda.shtml\">Rethinking Schools Online<\/a>; Winter 1997\/98 [cited 2009-02-08].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>29.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-36#cite_ref-36\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Nick Matzke. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Panda%27s_Thumb_%28blog%29\" title=\"The Panda's Thumb (blog)\">The Panda&#8217;s Thumb<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/pandasthumb.org\/archives\/2007\/08\/the-true-origin.html\">The true origin of &#8220;intelligent design&#8221;<\/a>; August 14, 2007 [cited 2010-01-21].<\/span><br \/> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/digital.library.cornell.edu\/cgi\/t\/text\/pageviewer-idx?c=scia;cc=scia;rgn=full%20text;idno=scia0002-48;didno=scia0002-48;view=image;seq=00383;node=scia0002-48%3A1\">Journals: Scientific American (1846\u20131869)<\/a> [cited 2010-01-21].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>30.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-37#cite_ref-37\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Patrick_Edward_Dove\" title=\"Patrick Edward Dove\">Dove, Patrick Edward<\/a>, <em>The theory of human progression, and natural probability of a reign of justice<\/em>. London, Johnstone &amp; Hunter, 1850. LC 08031381 &#8220;Intelligence-Intelligent Design&#8221;. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>31.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-38#cite_ref-38\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles_Darwin\" title=\"Charles Darwin\">Charles Darwin<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.darwinproject.ac.uk\/darwinletters\/calendar\/entry-3154.html\">Letter 3154\u2014Darwin, C. R. to Herschel, J. F. W., 23 May 1861<\/a>; May 23, 1861.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>32.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-39#cite_ref-39\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">The British Association. <em>The Times<\/em>. September 20, 1873:10; col A..<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>33.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-40#cite_ref-40\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_P._Alston\" title=\"William P. Alston\">William P. Alston<\/a>. In: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paul_Edwards_%28philosopher%29\" title=\"Paul Edwards (philosopher)\">Paul Edwards<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Encyclopedia_of_Philosophy\" title=\"Encyclopedia of Philosophy\">Encyclopedia of Philosophy<\/a><\/em>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/New_York_City\" title=\"New York City\">New York City<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/London\" title=\"London\">London<\/a>: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Macmillan_Publishing_Company\" title=\"Macmillan Publishing Company\">Macmillan Publishing Company<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Free_Press_%28publisher%29\" title=\"Free Press (publisher)\">The Free Press<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Collier_Books\" title=\"Collier Books\">Collier Macmillan Publishers<\/a>; 1967. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0028949900\">ISBN 0-02-894990-0<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>34.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-41#cite_ref-41\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_Nozick\" title=\"Robert Nozick\">Robert Nozick<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Anarchy,_State,_and_Utopia\" title=\"Anarchy, State, and Utopia\">Anarchy, State, and Utopia<\/a><\/em>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/USA\" title=\"USA\">USA<\/a>: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Basic_Books\" title=\"Basic Books\">Basic Books<\/a>; 1974. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0465097200\">ISBN 0-465-09720-0<\/a>. p. 19.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>35.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-42#cite_ref-42\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">James E. Horigan. <em>Chance or Design?<\/em>. Philosophical Library; 1979.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>36.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-43#cite_ref-43\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Nicholas Timmins. <a href=\"http:\/\/telicthoughts.com\/sir-fred-hoyle-and-the-origins-of-id\/\">Evolution according to Hoyle: Survivors of disaster in an earlier world<\/a>. January 13, 1982:22. &#8220;F. Hoyle stated in a 1982 speech: &#8216;&#8230;one arrives at the conclusion that biomaterials with their amazing measure or order must be the outcome of intelligent design.'&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>37.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Matzke_44-0#cite_ref-Matzke_44-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Matzke_44-1#cite_ref-Matzke_44-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Nick Matzke. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/rncse\/26\/1-2\/design-trial\">NCSE Resource &#8212; 9.0. Matzke (2006): The Story of the Pandas Drafts<\/a>; 2006 [cited 2009-11-18].<\/span> *<span class=\"citation\">Nick Matzke. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.ncseweb.org\/wp\/?p=80\">Missing Link discovered!<\/a>; 2006 [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20070114121029\/http:\/www2.ncseweb.org\/wp\/?p=80\">archived<\/a> 2007-01-14; cited 2009-11-18].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>38.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-45#cite_ref-45\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Jonathan Witt. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.evolutionnews.org\/2005\/12\/post_6.html\">Evolution News &amp; Views: Dover Judge Regurgitates Mythological History of Intelligent Design<\/a>; December 20, 2005 [cited 2007-10-05].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>39.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-46#cite_ref-46\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">DarkSyde. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailykos.com\/story\/2006\/3\/11\/8448\/52824\">Daily Kos: Know Your Creationists: Know Your Allies<\/a>; March 11, 2006 [cited 2007-10-05].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>40.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-47#cite_ref-47\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">William Safire. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/08\/21\/magazine\/21ONLANGUAGE.html\">On Language: Neo-Creo<\/a>. <em>The New York Times<\/em>. August 21, 2005 [cited 2009-12-20].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>41.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-pandafounds_48-0#cite_ref-pandafounds_48-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-pandafounds_48-1#cite_ref-pandafounds_48-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-pandafounds_48-2#cite_ref-pandafounds_48-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Nick Matzke. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/creationism\/analysis\/critique-pandas-people\">NCSE Resource<\/a>; 2004 [cited 2007-09-24].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>42.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-49#cite_ref-49\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Richard P. Aulie. National Association of Biology Teachers. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stephenjaygould.org\/ctrl\/archive\/design\/aulie_of-pandas.html\">A Reader&#8217;s Guide to Of Pandas and People<\/a>; 1998 [cited 2007-10-05].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>43.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-50#cite_ref-50\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\">Nick Matzke; Jon Buell (October 13, 2005). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pandasthumb.org\/archives\/2005\/10\/i_guess_id_real.html\">&#8220;I guess ID really was &#8220;Creationism&#8217;s Trojan Horse&#8221; after all&#8221;<\/a>. The Panda&#8217;s Thumb<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pandasthumb.org\/archives\/2005\/10\/i_guess_id_real.html\">http:\/\/www.pandasthumb.org\/archives\/2005\/10\/i_guess_id_real.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2009-06-02<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>44.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-51#cite_ref-51\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">William A. Dembski. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.designinference.com\/documents\/2005.09.Expert_Report_Dembski.pdf\">Expert Witness Report: The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design<\/a> [PDF]. March 29, 2005 [cited 2009-06-02].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>45.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-52#cite_ref-52\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Behe, Michael (1997): <em>Molecular Machines: Experimental Support for the Design Inference<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apologetics.org\/MolecularMachines\/tabid\/99\/Default.aspx\">[1]<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>46.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-53#cite_ref-53\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Irreducible complexity of these examples is disputed; see Kitzmiller, pp. 76\u201378, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pandasthumb.org\/archives\/2006\/01\/ken_miller_webc.html\">Ken Miller Webcast<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>47.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-54#cite_ref-54\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> The Collapse of &#8220;Irreducible Complexity&#8221; Kenneth R. Miller Brown University <a href=\"http:\/\/www.millerandlevine.com\/km\/evol\/design2\/article.html\">[2]<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>48.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-57#cite_ref-57\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1090909-3,00.html\">http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1090909-3,00.html<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>49.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-58#cite_ref-58\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Dembski. Intelligent Design, p. 47 <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>50.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-59#cite_ref-59\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> William Dembski, Photo by Wesley R. Elsberry, taken at lecture given at University of California at Berkeley, 2006\/03\/17. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>51.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-60#cite_ref-60\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Branden Fitelson, Christopher Stephens, Elliott Sober. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/philosophy.wisc.edu\/sober\/dembski.pdf\">How Not to Detect Design: A review of William A. Dembski&#8217;s The Design Inference\u2014Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities<\/a><\/em> [PDF]. Cambridge University Press; 1998.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>52.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Wein_62-0#cite_ref-Wein_62-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Wein_62-1#cite_ref-Wein_62-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">Richard Wein. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/design\/faqs\/nfl\/\">Not a Free Lunch But a Box of Chocolates: A critique of William Dembski&#8217;s book <em>No Free Lunch<\/em><\/a>; 2002.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>53.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-63#cite_ref-63\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Mark Perakh. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkreason.org\/articles\/newmath.cfm\">Dembski &#8216;displaces Darwinism&#8217; mathematically \u2013 or does he?<\/a>; 2005.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>54.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-64#cite_ref-64\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">John S. Wilkins, Wesley R. Elsberry. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkdesign.org\/cs\/theft_over_toil\">The Advantages of Theft over Toil: The Design Inference and Arguing from Ignorance<\/a>. <em>Biology and Philosophy<\/em>. 2001;16:711\u2013724. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1023%2FA%3A1012282323054\">10.1023\/A:1012282323054<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>55.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-65#cite_ref-65\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Richard Dawkins. <em>The God Delusion<\/em>. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2006. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0618680004\">ISBN 0-618-68000-4<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>56.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-66#cite_ref-66\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/mg19526146.000-evolutionary-algorithms-now-surpass-human-designers.html\">Evolutionary algorithms now surpass human designers<\/a>. <em>New Scientist<\/em>. July 28, 2007.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>57.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-67#cite_ref-67\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Guillermo Gonzalez. <em>The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery<\/em>. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing; 2004. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0895260654\">ISBN 0-89526-065-4<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>58.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-68#cite_ref-68\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> The Panda&#8217;s Thumb. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pandasthumb.org\/archives\/2004\/08\/privileged_plan_4.html\">review of The Privileged Planet<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>59.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-69#cite_ref-69\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.colorado.edu\/philosophy\/vstenger\/Cosmo\/FineTune.pdf#search=%22Fine%20tuned%20universe%22\">Is The Universe Fine-Tuned For Us?<\/a> Victor J. Stenger. University of Colorado. (PDF file) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>60.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-70#cite_ref-70\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Victor J. Stenger. University of Colorado. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.colorado.edu\/philosophy\/vstenger\/Cosmo\/ant_encyc.pdf\">The Anthropic Principle<\/a> [PDF].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>61.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-71#cite_ref-71\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Joseph Silk. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v443\/n7108\/full\/443145a.html\">Our place in the Multiverse<\/a>. <em>Nature<\/em>. September 14, 2006;443(7108):145\u2013146. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">oi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1038%2F443145a\">10.1038\/443145a<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>62.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-72#cite_ref-72\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> See, e.g., <span class=\"citation\">Gerald Feinberg and Robert Shapiro. A Puddlian Fable. In: Huchingson. <em>Religion and the Natural Sciences<\/em>. 1993. p. 220\u2013221.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>63.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-73#cite_ref-73\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">R.T., Pennock, (2000). <em>Tower of Babel: the evidence against the new creationism<\/em>. City: MIT Press. pp.\u00a0229\u2013229, 233\u2013242. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0-262-66165-9\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/0-262-66165-9\">0-262-66165-9<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>64.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-75#cite_ref-75\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">LeaderU. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.leaderu.com\/offices\/dembski\/docs\/bd-the_ac.html\">The Act of Creation: Bridging Transcendence and Immanence<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>65.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-CoyneTNR_76-0#cite_ref-CoyneTNR_76-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-CoyneTNR_76-1#cite_ref-CoyneTNR_76-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/pondside.uchicago.edu\/cluster\/pdf\/coyne\/New_Republic_ID.pdf\">The Case Against Intelligent Design<\/a> [PDF]. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_New_Republic\" title=\"The New Republic\">The New Republic<\/a><\/em>. August 22\u201329, 2005 [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20060618235930\/http:\/pondside.uchicago.edu\/cluster\/pdf\/coyne\/New_Republic_ID.pdf\">archived<\/a> 2006-06-18];233(8\/9):21\u201333.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>66.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-77#cite_ref-77\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Donald E. Simanek. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lhup.edu\/%7Edsimanek\/philosop\/empty.htm\">Intelligent Design: The Glass is Empty<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>67.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Rosenhouse_79-0#cite_ref-Rosenhouse_79-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Jason Rosenhouse. Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.csicop.org\/intelligentdesignwatch\/designer.html\">Who Designed the Designer?<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>68.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-80#cite_ref-80\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Richard Dawkins. <em>The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design<\/em>. p. 141.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>69.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-81#cite_ref-81\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> See, e.g., <span class=\"citation\">Joseph Manson. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.today.ucla.edu\/portal\/ut\/050927voices_pseudoscience.aspx\">Intelligent design is pseudoscience<\/a>; September 27, 2005.<\/span>; <span class=\"citationjournal\">Rev Max (July\u2013August 2006). &#8220;The Incredibly Strange Story of Intelligent Design&#8221;. <em>New Dawn Magazine<\/em> (97).<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>70.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-82#cite_ref-82\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/creationism\/general\/evolving-banners-at-discovery-institute\">NCSE Resource<\/a>; August 29, 2002 [cited 2007-10-07].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>71.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-harvard_83-0#cite_ref-harvard_83-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-harvard_83-1#cite_ref-harvard_83-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">David Mu. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hcs.harvard.edu\/%7Ehsr\/fall2005\/mu.pdf\">Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design<\/a> [PDF]. <em>Harvard Science Review<\/em>. Fall 2005;19(1). &#8220;For most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creationist\" title=\"Creationist\">creationist<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pseudoscience\" title=\"Pseudoscience\">pseudoscience<\/a>&#8220;.&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>72.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-85#cite_ref-85\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/6:Curriculum,_Conclusion#Page_136_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/6:Curriculum, Conclusion\">Conclusion of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Ruling<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>73.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-86#cite_ref-86\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Wise, D.U., 2001, Creationism&#8217;s Propaganda Assault on Deep Time and Evolution, <em>Journal of Geoscience Education<\/em>, v. 49, n. 1, p. 30\u201335. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>74.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-87#cite_ref-87\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Marcus R. Ross. <a href=\"http:\/\/nagt.org\/files\/nagt\/jge\/abstracts\/Ross_v53n3p319.pdf\">Who Believes What? Clearing up Confusion over Intelligent Design and Young-Earth Creationism<\/a> [PDF]. <em>Journal of Geoscience Education<\/em>. May, 2005;53(3):319\u2013323.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>75.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-88#cite_ref-88\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ronald_L._Numbers\" title=\"Ronald L. Numbers\">Ronald L. Numbers<\/a>. <em>The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design, Expanded Edition<\/em>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cambridge,_Massachusetts\" title=\"Cambridge, Massachusetts\">Cambridge, Massachusetts<\/a>: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Harvard_University_Press\" title=\"Harvard University Press\">Harvard University Press<\/a>; November 30, 2006. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0674023390\">ISBN 0-674-02339-0<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>76.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-89#cite_ref-89\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Barbara_Forrest\" title=\"Barbara Forrest\">Forrest, B.C.<\/a> and Gross, P.R.. <em>Evolution and the Wedge of Intelligent Design: The Trojan Horse Strategy<\/em>. Oxford: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Oxford_University_Press\" title=\"Oxford University Press\">Oxford University Press<\/a>; 2003. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0195157427\">ISBN 0-19-515742-7<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>77.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-91#cite_ref-91\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eugenie_Scott\" title=\"Eugenie Scott\">Eugenie Scott<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/creationism\/general\/creationevolution-continuum\">The Creation\/Evolution Continuum<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">NCSE<\/a> Reports<\/em>. 1999;19(4):16\u201317, 23\u201325.<\/span>; <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eugenie_Scott\" title=\"Eugenie Scott\">Scott, Eugenie C.<\/a>. <em>Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction<\/em>. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press; 2004. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0520246500\">ISBN 0-520-24650-0<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>78.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-94#cite_ref-94\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/fellows\/\">Discovery Institute fellows and staff<\/a>.<\/span> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/csc\/fellows.php\">&#8220;Center for Science and Culture fellows and staff&#8221;<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/csc\/fellows.php\">http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/csc\/fellows.php<\/a><\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>79.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-95#cite_ref-95\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Barbara Forrest. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.infidels.org\/library\/modern\/barbara_forrest\/wedge.html\">The Wedge at Work: Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics<\/a>; 2001.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>80.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Design_Inference_99-0#cite_ref-Design_Inference_99-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Design_Inference_99-1#cite_ref-Design_Inference_99-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> William Dembski, 1998. <em>The Design Inference<\/em>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>81.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-100#cite_ref-100\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Dembski, 1999. <em>Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology<\/em>, p. 210. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>82.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-101#cite_ref-101\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">William Dembski. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.designinference.com\/documents\/2005.02.Reply_to_Henry_Morris.htm\">Intelligent Design&#8217;s Contribution to the Debate Over Evolution: A Reply to Henry Morris<\/a>; 2005.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>83.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-103#cite_ref-103\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.centerforinquiry.net\/uploads\/attachments\/intelligent-design.pdf\">Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper<\/a> [PDF]; 2007 May.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>84.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-104#cite_ref-104\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">Dixon, Thomas (2008). <em>Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.\u00a082. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/978-0-19-929551-7\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/978-0-19-929551-7\">978-0-19-929551-7<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>85.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-105#cite_ref-105\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">H. Ross. Pasadena, California: Reasons to Believe. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reasons.org\/resources\/fff\/2002issue10\/index.shtml#more_than_id\">More than intelligent design<\/a>; 2002 [cited April 25, 2007].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>86.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-106#cite_ref-106\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Henry M. Morris. Santee, California: Institute for Creation Research. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.icr.org\/article\/859\/17\/\">Design is not enough!<\/a>; 1999 [cited April 25, 2007].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>87.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-107#cite_ref-107\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Carl Wieland. Answers in Genesis. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.answersingenesis.org\/docs2002\/0830_IDM.asp\">AiG&#8217;s views on the Intelligent Design movement<\/a>; 2002 [cited April 25, 2007].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>88.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-108#cite_ref-108\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Harris Interactive. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.harrisinteractive.com\/harris_poll\/index.asp?PID=581\">Nearly Two-thirds of U.S. Adults Believe Human Beings Were Created by God<\/a>; July 6, 2005 [cited 2007-07-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>89.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-109#cite_ref-109\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">New Mexicans for Science and Reason. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nmsr.org\/id-poll.htm\">Sandia National Laboratories says that the Intelligent Design Network (IDNet-NM\/Zogby) &#8220;Lab Poll&#8221; is BOGUS!<\/a> [cited 2007-07-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>90.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Polling_for_ID_110-0#cite_ref-Polling_for_ID_110-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. [www.csicop.org\/doubtandabout\/polling\/ Polling for ID]; September 11, 2003 [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20080327041611\/http:\/csicop.org\/doubtandabout\/polling\/\">archived<\/a> 2008-03-27; cited 2007-02-16].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>91.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-111#cite_ref-111\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">David Harris. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Salon.com\" title=\"Salon.com\">Salon.com<\/a>. [blogs.salon.com\/0001092\/2003\/07\/30.html &#8216;Intelligent Design&#8217;-ers launch new assault on curriculum using lies and deception] [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20030816135718\/http:\/blogs.salon.com\/0001092\/2003\/07\/30.html\">archived<\/a> 2003-08-16; cited 2007-07-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>92.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-113#cite_ref-113\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Gallup, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gallup.com\/poll\/21814\/evolution-creationism-intelligent-design.aspx\">&#8220;Evolution, creationism, intelligent design,&#8221;<\/a>. Retrieved 24 August 2010. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>93.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-114#cite_ref-114\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt1091617\/\">Expelled, No Intelligence Allowed (2008)<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>94.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-115#cite_ref-115\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.livescience.com\/strangenews\/080404-expelled-movie.html\">New Anti-Evolution Film Stirs Controversy<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>95.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-116#cite_ref-116\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Shaw, Linda. <a href=\"http:\/\/seattletimes.nwsource.com\/html\/localnews\/2002225932_design31m.html\">Does Seattle group &#8220;teach controversy&#8221; or contribute to it?<\/a>. <em>Seattle Times<\/em>. March 31, 2005.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>96.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-117#cite_ref-117\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">National Association of Biology Teachers. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nabt.org\/sub\/position_statements\/evolution.asp\">NABT&#8217;s Statement on Teaching Evolution<\/a> [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20060927160040\/http:\/www.nabt.org\/sub\/position_statements\/evolution.asp\">archived<\/a> 2006-09-27].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>97.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-118#cite_ref-118\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">The Interacademy Panel on International Issues. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.interacademies.net\/Object.File\/Master\/6\/150\/Evolution%20statement.pdf\">IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution<\/a> [PDF]; June 21, 2006 [cited 2008-10-17].<\/span> Joint statement issued by the national science academies of 67 countries, including the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_Kingdom\" title=\"United Kingdom\">United Kingdom<\/a>&#8216;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Royal_Society\" title=\"Royal Society\">Royal Society<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>98.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-119#cite_ref-119\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> From the world&#8217;s largest general scientific society: <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationpressrelease\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2006\/pdf\/0219boardstatement.pdf\">&#8220;Statement on the Teaching of Evolution&#8221;<\/a> (PDF) (Press release). <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/American_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Science\" title=\"American Association for the Advancement of Science\">American Association for the Advancement of Science<\/a>. February 16, 2006<\/span><\/span><span class=\"printonly\"><span lang=\"EN\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2006\/pdf\/0219boardstatement.pdf\">http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2006\/pdf\/0219boardstatement.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\"><span lang=\"EN\">. Retrieved 2008-10-17<\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationpressrelease\"><span lang=\"EN\">.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\" lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationpressrelease\"><span lang=\"EN\">Pinholster, Ginger (February 19, 2006). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2006\/0219boardstatement.shtml\">&#8220;AAAS Denounces Anti-Evolution Laws&#8221;<\/a> (Press release). <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/American_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Science\" title=\"American Association for the Advancement of Science\">American Association for the Advancement of Science<\/a><\/span><\/span><span class=\"printonly\"><span lang=\"EN\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2006\/0219boardstatement.shtml\">http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2006\/0219boardstatement.shtml<\/a><\/span><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\"><span lang=\"EN\">. Retrieved 2008-10-17<\/span><\/span><span class=\"citationpressrelease\"><span lang=\"EN\">.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\" lang=\"EN\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>99.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-120#cite_ref-120\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">Dixon, Thomas (2008). <em>Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.\u00a0102. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/978-0-19-929551-7\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/978-0-19-929551-7\">978-0-19-929551-7<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>100.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-121#cite_ref-121\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/news\/world\/intelligent-design-a-trojan-horse-says-creationist\/2005\/11\/26\/1132966007431.html\">Intelligent design a Trojan horse, says creationist<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sydney_Morning_Herald\" title=\"Sydney Morning Herald\">Sydney Morning Herald<\/a><\/em>. November 27, 2005 [cited 2007-07-29].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>101.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-122#cite_ref-122\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.au.org\/site\/PageServer?pagename=cs_2005_02_special\">Intelligent Design: Creationism&#8217;s Trojan Horse<\/a>; 2005 February [cited 2007-07-29].<\/span><sup>[<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Link_rot\" title=\"Wikipedia:Link rot\">dead link<\/a><\/em>]<\/sup> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>102.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Time-15-Aug-2005_123-0#cite_ref-Time-15-Aug-2005_123-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Time-15-Aug-2005_123-1#cite_ref-Time-15-Aug-2005_123-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1090909,00.html\">The Evolution Wars<\/a>. <em>Time<\/em>. August 7, 2005 [cited 2007-07-23].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>103.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-TIME_124-0#cite_ref-TIME_124-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/news\/2005\/08\/evolution-wars-time-00696\">&#8220;The evolution wars&#8221; in Time<\/a>; August 11, 2005 [cited 2009-11-18].<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Journalism and the Debate Over Origins: Newspaper Coverage of Intelligent Design. <em>Journal of Media and Religion<\/em>. 2006;5(1):49\u201361. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1207%2Fs15328415jmr0501_3\">10.1207\/s15328415jmr0501_3<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Television wildlife programming as a source of popular scientific information: a case study of evolution. <em>Public Understanding of Science<\/em>. 2006;15:131\u2013152. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1177%2F0963662506060588\">10.1177\/0963662506060588<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Answers in Genesis. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.answersingenesis.org\/docs2005\/0810time.asp\">Time for evolution wars<\/a>; 2005-08-10 [cited 2009-02-16].<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>104.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-DeWolf_125-0#cite_ref-DeWolf_125-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-DeWolf_125-1#cite_ref-DeWolf_125-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\">DeWolf, David K. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.umt.edu\/mlr\/Discovery%20Institute%20Article.pdf\">Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover<\/a> [PDF]. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_Montana\" title=\"University of Montana\">University of Montana<\/a> Law Review<\/em>. May 4, 2007;68(1).<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>105.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Chimp_126-0#cite_ref-Chimp_126-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/a\/2920\">Does God have a place in class?: Intelligent design ignites great debate<\/a>. <em>Calgary Herald<\/em>. 2005-08-25 [cited 2009-02-16].<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><em><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=H8yn0iaRRfoC&amp;pg=PA1&amp;vq=evolution+wars&amp;dq=politically+incorrect+guide+to+intelligent+design\">The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design<\/a><\/span><\/em><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">. Regnery Publishing; 2006. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/1596980133\">ISBN 1-59698-013-3<\/a>. p. 273.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">The Evolution Wars: Who Is Fighting with Whom about What?. In: Robert B. Stewart. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=MjKkFG8qVjcC&amp;pg=PA44&amp;vq=evolution+wars&amp;dq=intelligent+design+michael+ruse+william+dembski+2007\">Intelligent Design: William A. Dembski &amp; Michael Ruse in Dialogue<\/a><\/em>. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press; 2007. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0800662180\">ISBN 0-8006-6218-0<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>106.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Forrest2000_127-0#cite_ref-Forrest2000_127-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.infidels.org\/library\/modern\/barbara_forrest\/naturalism.html\">Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism: Clarifying the Connection<\/a>. <em>Philo<\/em>. 2000 [cited 2007-07-27];3(2):7\u201329.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>107.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-128#cite_ref-128\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><em>Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law and Education<\/em>. InterVarsity Press; 1995. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0830819290\">ISBN 0-8308-1929-0<\/a>.<\/span>[Johnson positions himself as a &#8220;theistic realist&#8221; against &#8220;methodological naturalism&#8221;.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>108.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-130#cite_ref-130\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> See, for instance: <span class=\"citation\">University of Texas, Austin. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.utexas.edu\/cola\/depts\/philosophy\/faculty\/koons\/ntse\/papers\/Vuletic.html\">Methodological Naturalism and the Supernatural<\/a>; 1997 February [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20080114094157\/http:\/www.utexas.edu\/cola\/depts\/philosophy\/faculty\/koons\/ntse\/papers\/Vuletic.html\">archived<\/a> 2008-01-14; cited 2007-07-27].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>109.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-132#cite_ref-132\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.leaderu.com\/pjohnson\/world2.html\">Witnesses For The Prosecution<\/a> [Reprint by Leadership U.]. <em>World (magazine)<\/em>. November 30, 1996 [cited 2007-07-23];11(28):18.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>110.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-134#cite_ref-134\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">The Foundation for Thought and Ethics, Dallas Christian Leadership, and the C. S. Lewis Fellowship. <a href=\"http:\/\/ebd10.ebd.csic.es\/pdfs\/DarwSciOrPhil.pdf\">Darwinism: Science or Philosophy<\/a> [PDF]; 1992 March [cited 2007-07-23].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>111.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-135#cite_ref-135\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationnews\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Karl_Giberson\" title=\"Karl Giberson\">Giberson, Karl<\/a> (December 5, 2005). &#8220;Intelligent design&#8217;s long march to nowhere&#8221;. <em>Science &amp; Theology News<\/em> (The Free Republic).<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>112.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-136#cite_ref-136\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/philosophy.wisc.edu\/sober\/what%27s%20wrong%20with%20id%20qrb%202007.pdf\">What is wrong with intelligent design?<\/a> [PDF]. <em>Quarterly Review of Biology<\/em>. 2007 [cited 2007-07-23];82(1):3\u20136. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1086%2F511656\">10.1086\/511656<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/17354991\">PMID 17354991<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>113.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-137#cite_ref-137\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Science Daily. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2007\/02\/070222155420.htm\">What Is Wrong With Intelligent Design?<\/a>; February 23, 2007 [cited 2007-07-23].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>114.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-138#cite_ref-138\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Franklin &amp; Marshall College. <a href=\"http:\/\/edisk.fandm.edu\/michael.murray\/Providence.pdf\">Natural Providence (or Design Trouble)<\/a> [PDF]; Forthcoming [cited 2007-07-23].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>115.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-139#cite_ref-139\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Creighton University. <a href=\"http:\/\/puffin.creighton.edu\/NRCSE\/NRCSEPosReID.html\">What is the position of the NRCSE on the teaching of intelligent design [ID] as an alternative to neo-Darwinian evolution in Nebraska schools?<\/a> [cited 2007-07-23].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>116.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-140#cite_ref-140\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Bring You To. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bringyou.to\/apologetics\/p91.htm\">Catechetical Lecture at St. Stephan&#8217;s Cathedral, Vienna<\/a> [Reprint]; October 2, 2005 [cited 2007-07-22]. &#8220;Purpose and design in the natural world, [has] no difficulty [&#8230;] with the theory of evolution [within] the borders of scientific theory.&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>117.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-141#cite_ref-141\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/creationism\/general\/creationevolution-continuum\">The Creation\/Evolution Continuum<\/a>; December 7, 2000 [cited 2009-11-18].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>118.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-142#cite_ref-142\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Council_of_Churches\" title=\"National Council of Churches\">National Council of Churches<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncccusa.org\/pdfs\/evolutionbrochurefinal.pdf\">Science, Religion, and the Teaching of Evolution in Public School Science Classes<\/a> [PDF]; 2006 March [cited 2007-07-17].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>119.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-143#cite_ref-143\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Creighton University. <a href=\"http:\/\/puffin.creighton.edu\/NRCSE\/IDTHG.html\">Intelligent Design as a Theological Problem<\/a> [Reprint]; 2002 [cited 2007-07-21].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>120.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Matt_Young.2C_Taner_Edis_144-0#cite_ref-Matt_Young.2C_Taner_Edis_144-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">Matt Young, Taner Edis (2006\u20132003). <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=hYLKdtlVeQgC&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false\"><em>Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism<\/em><\/a>. Rutgers, The State University. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/978-0-8135-3872-3\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/978-0-8135-3872-3\">978-0-8135-3872-3<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=hYLKdtlVeQgC&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false\">http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=hYLKdtlVeQgC&amp;pg=PR7&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2010-12-02<\/span><span class=\"citationbook\">. &#8220;An influential Roman Catholic cardinal, Cristoph Schonborn, the archbishop of Vienna, appeared to retreat from John Paul II&#8217;s support for evolution and wrote in <em>The New York Times<\/em> that descent with modification is a fact, but evolution in the sense of &#8220;an unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection&#8221; is false. Many of Schonborn&#8217;s complaints about Darwinian evolution echoed pronouncements originiating from the Discovery Institute, the right-wing American think tank that plays a central role in the ID movement (and whose public relations firm submitted Schonborn&#8217;s article to the Times).&#8221;<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>121.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Ronald_L._Numbers_145-0#cite_ref-Ronald_L._Numbers_145-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">Ronald L. Numbers (2006). <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=GQ3TI5njXfIC&amp;pg=PA395&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false\"><em>The creationists: from scientific creationism to intelligent design<\/em><\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Random_House\" title=\"Random House\">Random House<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/978-0-674-02339-0\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/978-0-674-02339-0\">978-0-674-02339-0<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=GQ3TI5njXfIC&amp;pg=PA395&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false\">http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=GQ3TI5njXfIC&amp;pg=PA395&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2010-12-02<\/span><span class=\"citationbook\">. &#8220;Miffed by Krauss&#8217;s comments, officers at the Discovery Institute arranged for the cardinal archbishop of Vienna, Cristoph Sconborn (b. 1945), to write an op-ed piece for the Times dismissing the late pope&#8217;s statement as &#8220;rather vague and unimportant&#8221; and denying the truth of &#8220;evolution in the neo-Darwinian sense-an unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection.&#8221; The cardinal, it seems, had received the backing of the new pope, Benedict XVI, the former Joseph Ratzinger (b. 1927), who in the mid-1980s, while serving as prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, successor to the notorious Inquisition, had written a defense of the doctrine of creation agasint Catholics who stressed the sufficiency of &#8220;selection and mutation.&#8221; Humans, he insisted, are &#8220;not the products of chance and error,&#8221; and &#8220;the universe is not the product of darkness and unreason. It comes from intelligence, freedom, and from the beauty that is identical with love.&#8221; Recent discoveries in microbiology and biochemistry, he was happy to say, had revealed &#8220;reasonable design.&#8221;&#8221;<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>122.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Parliamentary_Assembly_146-0#cite_ref-Parliamentary_Assembly_146-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\"><a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=imUrkSP_5sUC&amp;pg=PA66&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false\"><em>Parliamentary Assembly, Working Papers: 2007 Ordinary Session<\/em><\/a>. Council of Europe Publishing. 2008-04-25. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/978-92-871-6368-4\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/978-92-871-6368-4\">978-92-871-6368-4<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=imUrkSP_5sUC&amp;pg=PA66&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false\">http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=imUrkSP_5sUC&amp;pg=PA66&amp;dq=archbishop+of+Vienna+intelligent+design#v=onepage&amp;q=archbishop%20of%20Vienna%20intelligent%20design&amp;f=false<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2010-12-02<\/span><span class=\"citationbook\">. &#8220;Christoph Schonborn, the Archbishop of Vienna, published an article in <em>The New York Times<\/em> stating that the declarations made by Pope John Paul II could not be interpreted as recognising evolution. At the same time, he repeated arguments put forward by the supporters of the intelligent design ideas.&#8221;<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>123.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-147#cite_ref-147\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Answers_in_Genesis\" title=\"Answers in Genesis\">Answers in Genesis<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.answersingenesis.org\/articles\/wow\/is-idm-christian\">Intelligent design: is it intelligent; is it Christian?<\/a>; February 4, 2006 [cited 2007-07-21].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>124.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-148#cite_ref-148\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Reasons to Believe. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reasons.org\/resources\/fff\/2002issue10\/index.shtml#more_than_id\">More Than Intelligent Design<\/a> [cited 2007-07-21].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>125.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-149#cite_ref-149\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationpressrelease\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.harunyahya.com\/new_releases\/news\/intelligent_design.php\">&#8220;The &#8220;Intelligent Design&#8221; Distraction&#8221;<\/a> (Press release). Harun Yahya International. 2007<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.harunyahya.com\/new_releases\/news\/intelligent_design.php\">http:\/\/www.harunyahya.com\/new_releases\/news\/intelligent_design.php<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2007-07-20<\/span><span class=\"citationpressrelease\">.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>126.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-150#cite_ref-150\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Answers in Genesis. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.answersingenesis.org\/docs2002\/0830_IDM.asp\">AiG&#8217;s views on the Intelligent Design Movement<\/a>; August 30, 2002 [cited 2007-07-20].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>127.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Slifkin_151-0#cite_ref-Slifkin_151-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Slifkin_151-1#cite_ref-Slifkin_151-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> Natan Slifkin (2006). <em>The Challenge of Creation<\/em> (New York: Yashar Books) 288 ff. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>128.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-152#cite_ref-152\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Miller, Kenneth. <em>Debating Design<\/em>. Cambridge University Press; 2004. The Flagellum Unspun. p. 95.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>129.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-153#cite_ref-153\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationweb\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.m-w.com\/dictionary\/science\">&#8220;Online dictionary&#8221;<\/a>. Merriam-Webster<\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.m-w.com\/dictionary\/science\">http:\/\/www.m-w.com\/dictionary\/science<\/a><\/span><span class=\"reference-accessdate\">. Retrieved 2009-05-22<\/span><span class=\"citationweb\">. &#8220;knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method <strong>. . .<\/strong> such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena&#8221;<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>130.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEPopper20023_154-0#cite_ref-FOOTNOTEPopper20023_154-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#CITEREFPopper2002#CITEREFPopper2002\">Popper 2002<\/a>, p.\u00a03. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>131.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-155#cite_ref-155\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\">Wilson, Edward (1999). <em>Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge<\/em>. New York: Vintage. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0-679-76867-X\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/0-679-76867-X\">0-679-76867-X<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>132.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-156#cite_ref-156\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ludwik_Fleck\" title=\"Ludwik Fleck\">Ludwik Fleck<\/a> (1935), <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=0KAGUpaUaGYC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=Ludwik+Fleck&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=LcJSSRN_ym&amp;sig=TKrx9GLwFYRGlgIprAcdPFnhJIE&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=rbCWTPGpD8Oblgfmw9iiCg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=3&amp;ved=0CB8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false\"><em>Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact<\/em><\/a> reminds us that before a specific fact &#8216;existed&#8217;, it had to be created as part of a social agreement within a community. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>133.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-157#cite_ref-157\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Cover, J.A., Curd, Martin (Eds, 1998) <em>Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues<\/em>, 1-82. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>134.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-158#cite_ref-158\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">National Academy of Sciences. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nap.edu\/openbook.php?isbn=0309064066&amp;page=25\">Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences<\/a>; 1999.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>135.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-162#cite_ref-162\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><em><a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/?id=kHeQhdNQvrUC&amp;pg=PA210&amp;lpg=PA210&amp;dq=intelligent+design+junk-science\">Junk Science<\/a><\/em>. Macmillan; 2006. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/9780312352417\">ISBN 978-0-312-35241-7<\/a>. p. 210 ff.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>136.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-164#cite_ref-164\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><em>Research Methods in Psychology<\/em>. 8th ed. Wadsworth Publishing; 2005. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0534609767\">ISBN 0-534-60976-7<\/a>. Chapter 2.<\/span> Discusses the scientific method, including the principles of falsifiability, testability, progressive development of theory, dynamic self-correcting of hypotheses, and parsimony, or &#8220;Occam&#8217;s razor&#8221;. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>137.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-166#cite_ref-166\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> See, e.g., <span class=\"citation\">Mark Perakh. Talk.reason. <a href=\"http:\/\/talkreason.com\/articles\/Skeptic_paper.cfm\">The Dream World of William Dembski&#8217;s Creationism<\/a>; 2005; p. 54\u201365.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>138.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-174#cite_ref-174\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PZ_Myers\" title=\"PZ Myers\">PZ Myers<\/a>, Pharyngula.org. <a href=\"http:\/\/pharyngula.org\/index\/science\/comments\/creationism_and_the_daubert_test\/\">Creationism and the Daubert test?<\/a>; May 21, 2005.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>139.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-175#cite_ref-175\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Pennock, Robert T. &#8220;Can&#8217;t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.&#8221; <em>Synthese<\/em>, Vol. 178, no 2, 2007, pp. 177-206. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/k305581557n60r31\">http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/k305581557n60r31<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>140.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-176#cite_ref-176\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citationbook\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Larry_Laudan\" title=\"Larry Laudan\">Laudan, Larry<\/a> (1983). <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=AEvprSJzv2MC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=isbn:9027715335&amp;cd=1#v=onepage&amp;q=Demise&amp;f=false\">&#8220;The Demise of the Demarcation Problem&#8221;<\/a>. In Cohen, R.S.; Laudan, L.. <em>Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Gr\u00fcnbaum<\/em>. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. <strong>76<\/strong>. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. pp.\u00a0111\u2013127. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/90-277-1533-5\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/90-277-1533-5\">90-277-1533-5<\/a><\/span><span class=\"printonly\">. <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=AEvprSJzv2MC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=isbn:9027715335&amp;cd=1#v=onepage&amp;q=Demise&amp;f=false\">http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=AEvprSJzv2MC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=isbn:9027715335&amp;cd=1#v=onepage&amp;q=Demise&amp;f=false<\/a><\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>141.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-177#cite_ref-177\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Carroll, Sean. &#8220;What Questions Can Science Answer?&#8221;. 2009. <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2009\/07\/15\/what-questions-can-science-answer\">http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/cosmicvariance\/2009\/07\/15\/what-questions-can-science-answer<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>142.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-laudan_178-0#cite_ref-laudan_178-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-laudan_178-1#cite_ref-laudan_178-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> Laudan, Larry. &#8220;Normative Naturalism&#8221;. <em>Philosophy of Science<\/em>, Vol. 57, no. 1, March 1990, pp. 44-59. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/187620\">http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/187620<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>143.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-forrest_179-0#cite_ref-forrest_179-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-forrest_179-1#cite_ref-forrest_179-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> Forrest, Barbara. &#8220;Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism: Clarifying the Connection.&#8221; <em>Philo<\/em>, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Fall-Winter 2000), pp. 7-29 <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.selu.edu\/Academics\/Faculty\/bforrest\/ForrestPhilo.pdf\">http:\/\/www2.selu.edu\/Academics\/Faculty\/bforrest\/ForrestPhilo.pdf<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>144.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitzruling_pg87_180-0#cite_ref-kitzruling_pg87_180-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitzruling_pg87_180-1#cite_ref-kitzruling_pg87_180-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitzruling_pg87_180-2#cite_ref-kitzruling_pg87_180-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_87_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">4. Whether ID is Science, p. 87<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>145.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-main_181-0#cite_ref-main_181-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/csc\/freeSpeechEvolCampMain.php\">Free Speech on Evolution Campaign Main Page<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Science_and_Culture\" title=\"Center for Science and Culture\">Center for Science and Culture<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>146.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-182#cite_ref-182\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">John Hawks Weblog. <a href=\"http:\/\/johnhawks.net\/weblog\/topics\/creation\/bush_intelligent_design_2005.html\">The President and the teaching of evolution<\/a>; 2005 August [cited 2007-07-19].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>147.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-183#cite_ref-183\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.skeptic.com\/eskeptic\/08-04-17.html#part1\">Skeptic: eSkeptic: Thursday, April 17, 2008<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>148.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-184#cite_ref-184\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/12\/04\/weekinreview\/04good.html?ex=1291352400&amp;en=feb5138e425b9001&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss\">Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker<\/a>. <em>The New York Times<\/em>. December 4, 2005 [cited 2007-07-19].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>149.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-185#cite_ref-185\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/20070926214521\/http:\/www.biolsocwash.org\/id_statement.html\">Statement from the Council of the Biological Society of Washington<\/a> at the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wayback_Machine\" title=\"Wayback Machine\">Wayback Machine<\/a> (<em>archived September 26, 2007<\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>150.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Meyer2004_186-0#cite_ref-Meyer2004_186-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Meyer, S.C.. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/filesDB-download.php?command=download&amp;id=549\">The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories<\/a>. <em>Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington<\/em>. 2004 [cited 2007-05-10];117(2):213\u2013239.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>151.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-188#cite_ref-188\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Design Inference Website. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.designinference.com\/documents\/2001.03.ID_as_nat_theol.htm\">Is Intelligent Design a Form of Natural Theology?<\/a>; 2001 [cited 2007-07-19].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>152.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-189#cite_ref-189\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/free\/v48\/i17\/17a00801.htm\">Darwinism Under Attack<\/a>; December 21, 2001 [cited 2008-12-10].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>153.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-190#cite_ref-190\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_88_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District 4: whether ID is science<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>154.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-191#cite_ref-191\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www3.interscience.wiley.com\/cgi-bin\/fulltext\/121602290\/HTMLSTART\">Simulating evolution by gene duplication of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues<\/a>. <em>Protein Science<\/em>. October 2004 [cited 16 March 2009];13(10):2651\u20132664. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1110%2Fps.04802904\">10.1110\/ps.04802904<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/15340163\">PMID 15340163<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/PubMed_Central\" title=\"PubMed Central\">PMC<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2286568\/\">2286568<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>155.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-192#cite_ref-192\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/4:Whether_ID_Is_Science#Page_88_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/4:Whether ID Is Science\">4: whether ID is science<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>156.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-193#cite_ref-193\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2253472\/\">Simple evolutionary pathways to complex proteins<\/a>. <em>Protein Science<\/em>. September 2005;14(9):2217\u20132225. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1110%2Fps.041171805\">10.1110\/ps.041171805<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/16131652\">PMID 16131652<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>157.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-194#cite_ref-194\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><em>, October 19, 2005, AM session <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/faqs\/dover\/day12am.html\">Kitzmiller Testimony, Behe<\/a><\/em> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>158.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-195#cite_ref-195\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Discovery Institute. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/scripts\/viewDB\/index.php?command=view&amp;id=2640&amp;program=CSC%20-%20Scientific%20Research%20and%20Scholarship%20-%20Science\">Peer-Reviewed, Peer-Edited, and other Scientific Publications Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design (Annotated)<\/a>; 2007 July [cited 2007-07-17].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>159.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-198#cite_ref-198\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.actionbioscience.org\/evolution\/nhmag.html\">Detecting Design in the Natural Sciences<\/a>; 2002 April [cited 2007-07-18].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>160.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-199#cite_ref-199\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Space.com\" title=\"Space.com\">Space.com<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.space.com\/searchforlife\/seti_intelligentdesign_051201.html\">SETI and Intelligent Design<\/a>; 2005 December [cited 2007-07-18]. &#8220;In fact, the signals actually sought by today&#8217;s SETI searches are not complex, as the ID advocates assume. [&#8230;] If SETI were to announce that we&#8217;re not alone because it had detected a signal, it would be on the basis of artificiality&#8221;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>161.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-201#cite_ref-201\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.csicop.org\/si\/2001-03\/intelligent-design.html\">Darwin in Mind: Intelligent Design Meets Artificial Intelligence<\/a>; 2001 March\/April [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20011018142820\/http:\/www.csicop.org\/si\/2001-03\/intelligent-design.html\">archived<\/a> 2001-10-18; cited 2007-07-17].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>162.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-202#cite_ref-202\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ideacenter.org\/contentmgr\/showdetails.php\/id\/1136\">Primer: Intelligent Design Theory in a Nutshell<\/a>; 2007 [cited 2007-07-14].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>163.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-2002-09-10_203-0#cite_ref-2002-09-10_203-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-2002-09-10_203-1#cite_ref-2002-09-10_203-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/creationism\/general\/intelligent-design-not-accepted-by-most-scientists\">&#8220;Intelligent Design&#8221; Not Accepted by Most Scientists<\/a>; 2002 September [cited 2009-11-18].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>164.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-monton_204-0#cite_ref-monton_204-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-monton_204-1#cite_ref-monton_204-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-monton_204-2#cite_ref-monton_204-2\"><strong><em><sup>c<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <span class=\"citationbook\">Monton, Bradley (2009). <em>Seeking God in Science<\/em>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Broadview_Press\" title=\"Broadview Press\">Broadview Press<\/a>. p.\u00a0114. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/International_Standard_Book_Number\" title=\"International Standard Book Number\">ISBN<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/978-1-55111-863-5\" title=\"Special:BookSources\/978-1-55111-863-5\">978-1-55111-863-5<\/a>.<\/span><span class=\"z3988\"><span style=\"display: none;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>165.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\">^ <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Stanford--GodoftheGaps_205-0#cite_ref-Stanford--GodoftheGaps_205-0\"><strong><em><sup>a<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-Stanford--GodoftheGaps_205-1#cite_ref-Stanford--GodoftheGaps_205-1\"><strong><em><sup>b<\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/a> Del Ratzsch (2005) <a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/teleological-arguments\/#4.3\">&#8220;Teleological Arguments for God&#8217;s Existence&#8221;, Section 4.3, The &#8220;Intelligent Design&#8221; (ID) Movement<\/a>, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>166.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-206#cite_ref-206\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> See, for instance: <span class=\"citation\">Man Come Of Age: Bonhoeffer&#8217;s Response To The God-Of-The-Gaps. <em>Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society<\/em>. 1971;14:203\u2013220.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>167.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-207#cite_ref-207\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Colin A. Ronan. <em>The Cambridge Illustrated History of the World&#8217;s Science<\/em>. p. 61. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>168.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-208#cite_ref-208\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> Colin A. Ronan. <em>The Cambridge Illustrated History of the World&#8217;s Science<\/em>. p. 123. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>169.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-209#cite_ref-209\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/creationism\/legal\/intelligent-design-trial-kitzmiller-v-dover\">Intelligent Design on Trial: Kitzmiller v. Dover<\/a>. National Center for Science Education. October 17, 2008 <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>170.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-210#cite_ref-210\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tammy_Kitzmiller,_et_al._v._Dover_Area_School_District,_et_al.\" title=\"Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al.\">Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al.<\/a><\/cite> (United States District Court for the middle district of Pennsylvania 2005). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pamd.uscourts.gov\/kitzmiller\/04cv2688-111.pdf\">Text<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>171.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-211#cite_ref-211\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/pewforum.org\/news\/display.php?NewsID=5945\">Judge Rules Against &#8216;Intelligent Design&#8217;<\/a>. <em>The Washington Post<\/em>. December 21, 2005 [<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20070928055938\/http:\/pewforum.org\/news\/display.php?NewsID=5945\">archived<\/a> 2007-09-28; cited 2007-09-03].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>172.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-kitz137_212-0#cite_ref-kitz137_212-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <cite><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\" title=\"Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\">Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/a><\/cite>, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). , <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District\/6:Curriculum,_Conclusion#Page_137_of_139\" title=\"s:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District\/6:Curriculum, Conclusion\">pp. 137\u2013138<\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>173.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-213#cite_ref-213\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Discovery Institute. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.evolutionnews.org\/2005\/12\/dover_intelligent_design_decis.html\">Dover Intelligent Design Decision Criticized as a Futile Attempt to Censor Science Education<\/a>; December 20, 2005 [cited 2007-09-03].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>174.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-214#cite_ref-214\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/10545387\/\">Judge rules against &#8216;intelligent design&#8217;<\/a>. December 20, 2005 [cited 2008-10-17]. Associated Press. MSNBC.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>175.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-215#cite_ref-215\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.skeptic.com\/eskeptic\/06-09-21.html\">Godless: The Church of Liberalism<\/a>; September 21, 2006 [cited 2007-09-03].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>176.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-216#cite_ref-216\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">National Center for Science Education. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/creationism\/general\/discovery-institute-tries-to-swift-boat-judge-jones\">Discovery Institute tries to &#8220;swift-boat&#8221; Judge Jones<\/a>; January 4, 2006 [cited 2009-11-18].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>177.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-217#cite_ref-217\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/sharedcontent\/dws\/dn\/latestnews\/stories\/122105dnnatidesign.780fc9a.html\">Intelligent design policy struck down<\/a>. <em>Dallas Morning News<\/em>. December 20, 2005 [cited 2007-09-03].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>178.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-218#cite_ref-218\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.umt.edu\/mlr\/Editors%27%20Note.pdf\">Articles: Editor&#8217;s Note: Intelligent Design Articles<\/a> [PDF]. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_Montana\" title=\"University of Montana\">University of Montana<\/a> Law Review<\/em>. April 10, 2007 [cited 2008-10-16];68(1).<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>179.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-219#cite_ref-219\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Irons, Peter. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.umt.edu\/mlr\/Irons%20Response.pdf\">Disaster In Dover: The Trials (And Tribulations) Of Intelligent Design<\/a> [PDF]. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_Montana\" title=\"University of Montana\">University of Montana<\/a> Law Review<\/em>. April 27, 2007 [cited 2008-10-16];68(1).<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>180.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-220#cite_ref-220\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">DeWolf, David K; West, John G; Luskin, Casey. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.umt.edu\/mlr\/DI%20Rebuttal.pdf\">Rebuttal to Irons<\/a> [PDF]. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_Montana\" title=\"University of Montana\">University of Montana<\/a> Law Review<\/em>. April 27, 2007 [cited 2008-10-16];68(1).<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>181.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-221#cite_ref-221\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">National Center for Science Education. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/news\/2010\/07\/american-academy-religion-teaching-creationism-005712\">American Academy of Religion on teaching creationism<\/a>; July 23, 2010 [cited 2010-08-09].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>182.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-222#cite_ref-222\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Council_of_Europe\" title=\"Council of Europe\">Council of Europe<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/assembly.coe.int\/Main.asp?link=\/Documents\/WorkingDocs\/Doc07\/EDOC11297.htm\">The dangers of creationism in education<\/a> [cited 2007-08-03].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>183.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-223#cite_ref-223\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">National Center for Science Education. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/news\/2007\/10\/council-europe-approves-resolution-against-creationism-001200\">NCSE Resource\u2014Council of Europe approves resolution against creationism<\/a>; October 4, 2007 [cited 2009-11-18].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 74.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Wingdings;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00a7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/uk.reuters.com\/article\/scienceNewsMolt\/idUKL0417855220071004\">Council of Europe firmly opposes creationism in school<\/a>. 2007-10-04 [cited 2007-10-05]. Reuters.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>184.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-225#cite_ref-225\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Center_for_Science_and_Culture\" title=\"Center for Science and Culture\">Center for Science and Culture<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Unlocking_the_Mystery_of_Life\" title=\"Unlocking the Mystery of Life\">Unlocking the Mystery of Life<\/a><\/span>; July 15, 2004 [cited 2007-07-13]. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>185.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-226#cite_ref-226\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/science\/2006\/nov\/27\/controversiesinscience.religion\">Revealed: rise of creationism in UK schools<\/a>. <em>Guardian<\/em> (London). November 27, 2006 [cited 2008-10-17].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>186.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-227#cite_ref-227\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/education\/5392096.stm\">&#8216;Design&#8217; attack on school science<\/a>. September 29, 2006 [cited 2007-07-13]. BBC News.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>187.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-228#cite_ref-228\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Parliament_of_the_United_Kingdom\" title=\"Parliament of the United Kingdom\">Parliament of the United Kingdom<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.parliament.uk\/pa\/cm200506\/cmhansrd\/cm061101\/text\/61101w0010.htm#0611021004183\">Written Answers<\/a>; November 1, 2006 [cited 2007-07-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>188.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-229#cite_ref-229\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Parliament_of_the_United_Kingdom\" title=\"Parliament of the United Kingdom\">Parliament of the United Kingdom<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.parliament.uk\/pa\/ld200607\/ldhansrd\/text\/61218w0006.htm\">Schools: Intelligent Design<\/a>; December 18, 2006 [cited 2007-07-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>189.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-230#cite_ref-230\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">NCSE<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/news\/2007\/02\/guidance-creationism-british-teachers-001170\">NCSE Resource\u2014Guidance on creationism for British teachers<\/a>; September 25, 2007 [cited 2009-11-18].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>190.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-231#cite_ref-231\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Qualifications_and_Curriculum_Authority\" title=\"Qualifications and Curriculum Authority\">Qualifications and Curriculum Authority<\/a> for England. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.qca.org.uk\/libraryAssets\/media\/qca-06-2728_y9_science_religion_master.pdf\">How can we answer questions about creation and origins?<\/a> [PDF]; 2006 [cited 2007-10-01].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>191.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-232#cite_ref-232\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Prime Minister&#8217;s Office. London: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Her_Majesty%27s_Stationery_Office\" title=\"Her Majesty's Stationery Office\">Her Majesty&#8217;s Stationery Office<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.number10.gov.uk\/Page12021\">NoCreSciEd &#8211; epetition reply<\/a>; 21 June 2007 [cited 2007-07-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>192.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-233#cite_ref-233\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Lengagne, Guy. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Council_of_Europe\" title=\"Council of Europe\">Council of Europe<\/a>, Doc. 11297. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.assembly.coe.int\/Main.asp?link=\/Documents\/WorkingDocs\/Doc07\/EDOC11297.htm\">The dangers of creationism in education<\/a>; June 8, 2007 [cited 2008-10-17].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>193.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-234#cite_ref-234\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk\/lifestyle\/the-creation-of-a-new-giants-causeway-row-13498454.html\">The creation of a new Giant&#8217;s Causeway row<\/a>; November 30, 2007 [cited 2011-07-16].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>194.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-235#cite_ref-235\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Henry, Lesley-Anne. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk\/news\/education\/tussle-of-biblical-proportions-over-creationism-in-ulster-classrooms-13479246.html\">Tussle of Biblical proportions over creationism in Ulster classrooms<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Belfast_Telegraph\" title=\"Belfast Telegraph\">Belfast Telegraph<\/a><\/em>. September 26, 2007 [cited 2007-10-01].<\/span><br \/> * <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk\/opinion\/viewpoint-the-world-according-to-lisburn-folk-13479536.html\">Viewpoint: The world, according to Lisburn folk<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Belfast_Telegraph\" title=\"Belfast Telegraph\">Belfast Telegraph<\/a><\/em>. September 27, 2007 [cited 2007-10-01].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>195.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-236#cite_ref-236\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lisburntoday.co.uk\/news\/Creation-Motion-Passed-By-Council.3233193.jp\">Dup Call For Schools To Teach Creation Passed By Council\u2014Lisburn Today<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ulster_Star\" title=\"Ulster Star\">Ulster Star<\/a><\/em>. September 26, 2007 [cited 2008-10-17].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>196.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-237#cite_ref-237\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Enserink, Martin. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/cgi\/content\/summary\/308\/5727\/1394b\">Evolution Politics: Is Holland Becoming the Kansas of Europe?<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Science_%28journal%29\" title=\"Science (journal)\">Science<\/a><\/em>. June 3, 2005;308(5727):1394b. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Digital_Object_Identifier\" title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">doi<\/a>:<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1126%2Fscience.308.5727.1394b\">10.1126\/science.308.5727.1394b<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/15933170\">PMID 15933170<\/a>.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>197.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-238#cite_ref-238\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dutchnews.nl\/news\/archives\/print\/001501.php\">Cabinet ministers announced (update 2)<\/a>. February 13, 2007 [cited 2008-05-31]. DutchNews.nl.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>198.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-239#cite_ref-239\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> De Morgen, May 23, 2005 <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>199.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-240#cite_ref-240\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Center_for_Science_Education\" title=\"National Center for Science Education\">National Center for Science Education<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/rncse\/19\/6\/cloning-creationism-turkey\">Cloning Creationism in Turkey<\/a> [cited 2009-11-18].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>200.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-icash_241-0#cite_ref-icash_241-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Edis, Taner. History of Science Society. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hssonline.org\/publications\/Newsletter2008\/NewsletterJanuary2008Creationism.html\">Islamic Creationism: A Short History<\/a>; 2008 January [cited 2011-04-20].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>201.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-SecurityWatch_242-0#cite_ref-SecurityWatch_242-0\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\">Jones, Dorian L. ISN Security Watch. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.isn.ethz.ch\/isn\/Current-Affairs\/Security-Watch\/Detail\/?id=54183&amp;lng=en\">Turkey&#8217;s survival of the fittest<\/a>; March 12, 2008 [cited 2008-03-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>202.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-243#cite_ref-243\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <span class=\"citation\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/news\/national\/intelligent-design-not-science-experts\/2005\/10\/20\/1129775902661.html\">Intelligent design not science: experts<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sydney_Morning_Herald\" title=\"Sydney Morning Herald\">Sydney Morning Herald<\/a><\/em>. October 21, 2005 [cited 2007-07-13].<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>203.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-244#cite_ref-244\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/pm\/content\/2005\/s1447202.htm\">http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/pm\/content\/2005\/s1447202.htm<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 55.2pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\"><span>204.<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><strong><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intelligent_design#cite_ref-245#cite_ref-245\">^<\/a><\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theage.com.au\/news\/national\/school-backs-intelligent-design-dvd\/2005\/10\/27\/1130400306721.html\">http:\/\/www.theage.com.au\/news\/national\/school-backs-intelligent-design-dvd\/2005\/10\/27\/1130400306721.html<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span class=\"mw-headline\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\">Further reading<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paul_R._Gross\" title=\"Paul R. Gross\">Gross PR<\/a>; <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Barbara_Forrest\" title=\"Barbara Forrest\">Forrest B<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Creationism%27s_Trojan_Horse\" title=\"Creationism's Trojan Horse\">Creationism&#8217;s Trojan Horse: the Wedge of Intelligent Design<\/a><\/em>. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Oxford_University_Press\" title=\"Oxford University Press\">Oxford University Press<\/a>; 2004. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0195157427\">ISBN 0-19-515742-7<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.ca\/books?id=raqJjM9LkeAC&amp;printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false\">Preview<\/a> at Google Books <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Edward_Humes\" title=\"Edward Humes\">Humes E<\/a>. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Monkey_Girl:_Evolution,_Education,_Religion,_and_the_Battle_for_America%27s_Soul\" title=\"Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion, and the Battle for America's Soul\">Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion, and the Battle for America&#8217;s Soul<\/a><\/em>. New York, N.Y: ECCO; 2007. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0060885483\">ISBN 0-06-088548-3<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Edis T; Young M. <em>Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism<\/em>. New Brunswick, N.J.: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rutgers_University_Press\" title=\"Rutgers University Press\">Rutgers University Press<\/a>; 2006. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0813538726\">ISBN 0-8135-3872-6<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.ca\/books?id=hYLKdtlVeQgC&amp;printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false\">Preview<\/a> at Google Books <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><em><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Why_Darwin_Matters\" title=\"Why Darwin Matters\">Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design<\/a><\/span><\/em><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">. New York: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Henry_Holt_%28publisher%29\" title=\"Henry Holt (publisher)\">Henry Holt<\/a>; 2007. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/9780805083064\">ISBN 978-0-8050-8306-4<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span class=\"citation\"><span lang=\"EN\">Slack G. <em>The Battle over the Meaning of Everything: Evolution, Intelligent Design, and a School Board in Dover, PA<\/em>. San Francisco: <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/John_Wiley_%26_Sons\" title=\"John Wiley &amp; Sons\">Jossey-Bass<\/a>; 2007. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Special:BookSources\/0787987867\">ISBN 0-7879-8786-7<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.ca\/books?id=1kpx8HrQ08cC&amp;printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false\">Preview<\/a> at Google Books <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">ID perspectives <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arn.org\/\">Access Research Network<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.designinference.com\/\">Design Inference: The website of William A. Dembski<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.discovery.org\/\">Discovery Institute, Center for Science and Culture<\/a> (Hub of the intelligent design movement) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.evolutionnews.org\/\">EvolutionNews.org<\/a> Discovery Institute website tracking media coverage of intelligent design. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.idthefuture.com\/\">ID The Future<\/a> A multiple contributor weblog by Discovery Institute fellows. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.iscid.org\/\">International Society for Complexity, Information, and Design (ISCID)<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.uncommondescent.com\/\">Uncommon Descent<\/a> William Dembski&#8217;s blog <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Non-ID perspectives <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciam.com\/article.cfm?id=15-answers-to-creationist\">Scientific American &#8211; 15 Answers to Creationist Questions<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.aclu.org\/religion\/intelligentdesign\/index.html\">ACLU site on Intelligent Design<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20070620122151\/http:\/www.naturalhistorymag.com\/darwinanddesign.html\">Intelligent Design?<\/a> Special feature in the <em>Natural History<\/em> magazine <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.iep.utm.edu\/d\/design.htm\">Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Design Arguments for the Existence of God<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ncse.com\/creationism\/general\/what-is-intelligent-design-creationism\">National Center for Science Education What Is Intelligent Design Creationism?<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/releases\/2002\/1106id2.shtml\">Resolution from the American Association for the Advancement of Science<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nap.edu\/openbook.php?isbn=0309064066\"><em>Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences<\/em><\/a> Second Edition (1999) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/\">Talk Origins Archive<\/a> (Archive of the UseNet discussion group <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Talk.origins\" title=\"Talk.origins\">talk.origins<\/a>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pamd.uscourts.gov\/kitzmiller\/kitzmiller_342.pdf\">139 page in-depth analysis of intelligent design, irreducible complexity, and the book <em>Of Pandas and People<\/em><\/a> by the <em>Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School<\/em> District judge <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/jurist.law.pitt.edu\/forumy\/2005\/12\/kitzmiller-intelligent-ruling-on.php\">Kitzmiller: An Intelligent Ruling on &#8216;Intelligent Design&#8217;<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/JURIST\" title=\"JURIST\">JURIST<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.csicop.org\/intelligentdesignwatch\/differences.html\">ID and Creationism<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/philosophy.wisc.edu\/sober\/design%20argument%2011%202004.pdf\">The Design Argument<\/a> Elliott Sober, 2004. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/richarddawkins.net\/article,129,Natural-Knowledge-and-Natural-Design,Richard-Dawkins\">Natural &#8216;Knowledge&#8217; and Natural &#8216;Design&#8217;<\/a> by <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Richard_Dawkins\" title=\"Richard Dawkins\">Richard Dawkins<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Media articles <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/id\/\">Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial<\/a> A PBS-NOVA documentary on the Dover, PA Intelligent Design trial in 2005.(<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Public_Broadcasting_Service\" title=\"Public Broadcasting Service\">PBS<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.seattleweekly.com\/2006-02-01\/news\/discovery-s-creation\/\">Discovery&#8217;s Creation<\/a> An overview of the origin of the intelligent design movement. (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Seattle_Weekly\" title=\"Seattle Weekly\">Seattle Weekly<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tvw.org\/MediaPlayer\/Archived\/WME.cfm?EVNum=2006040103&amp;TYPE=V\">Intelligent Design vs. Evolution<\/a> debate between <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paleontologist\" title=\"Paleontologist\">paleontologist<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peter_Ward_%28paleontologist%29\" title=\"Peter Ward (paleontologist)\">Peter Ward<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stephen_Meyer\" title=\"Stephen Meyer\">Stephen Meyer<\/a> co-founder of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Discovery_Institute\" title=\"Discovery Institute\">Discovery Institute<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/12\/16\/AR2005121601559.html\">Intelligent Design Deja Vu<\/a> What would &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; science classes look like? All we have to do is look inside some 19th century textbooks. (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Washington_Post\" title=\"The Washington Post\">The Washington Post<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/cjrarchives.org\/issues\/2005\/5\/mooney.asp\">How the media have covered ID<\/a><sup>[<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikipedia:Link_rot\" title=\"Wikipedia:Link rot\">dead link<\/a><\/em>]<\/sup> (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Columbia_Journalism_Review\" title=\"Columbia Journalism Review\">Columbia Journalism Review<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/2005\/1221\/p01s01-ussc.html\">Banned in biology class: intelligent design<\/a> (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christian_Science_Monitor\" title=\"Christian Science Monitor\">Christian Science Monitor<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/archive\/2005\/05\/30\/050530fa_fact\">Devolution<\/a> (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_New_Yorker\" title=\"The New Yorker\">The New Yorker<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/pages\/science\/sciencespecial2\/\">The Evolution Debate<\/a> (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_New_York_Times\" title=\"The New York Times\">The New York Times<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/templates\/story\/story.php?storyId=5014428\">Debating Evolution in the Classroom<\/a> (<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Public_Radio\" title=\"National Public Radio\">NPR<\/a>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/health\/article\/0,8599,1142672,00.html\">Darwin Victorious<\/a> (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Time_%28magazine%29\" title=\"Time (magazine)\">TIME<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20070928143835\/http:\/www.justicetalking.org\/viewprogram.asp?progID=506\">Intelligent Design: Scientific Inquiry or Religious Indoctrination?<\/a> (Justice Talking) <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 38.4pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Symbol;\" lang=\"EN\"><span>\u00b7<span style=\"font: 7pt 'Times New Roman';\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/span><span lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/content.nejm.org\/cgi\/content\/full\/354\/21\/2277\">Intelligent Judging\u2014Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom<\/a> (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/New_England_Journal_of_Medicine\" title=\"New England Journal of Medicine\">New England Journal of Medicine<\/a><\/em>) <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span lang=\"EN\">Terminology<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Concepts<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\u00a0T<span lang=\"EN\">heories<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span style=\"display: none;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Acosmism\" title=\"Acosmism\">Acosmism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Agnosticism\" title=\"Agnosticism\">Agnosticism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Animism\" title=\"Animism\">Animism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Antireligion\" title=\"Antireligion\">Antireligion<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Atheism\" title=\"Atheism\">Atheism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dharma\" title=\"Dharma\">Dharmism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Deism\" title=\"Deism\">Deism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Divine_command_theory\" title=\"Divine command theory\">Divine command theory<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dualism\" title=\"Dualism\">Dualism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Esotericism\" title=\"Esotericism\">Esotericism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Exclusivism\" title=\"Exclusivism\">Exclusivism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Existentialism\" title=\"Existentialism\">Existentialism<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christian_existentialism\" title=\"Christian existentialism\">Christian<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Agnostic_existentialism\" title=\"Agnostic existentialism\">Agnostic<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Atheist_existentialism\" title=\"Atheist existentialism\">Atheist<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Feminist_theology\" title=\"Feminist theology\">Feminist theology<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fundamentalism\" title=\"Fundamentalism\">Fundamentalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gnosticism\" title=\"Gnosticism\">Gnosticism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Henotheism\" title=\"Henotheism\">Henotheism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Humanism\" title=\"Humanism\">Humanism<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Religious_humanism\" title=\"Religious humanism\">Religious<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Secular_humanism\" title=\"Secular humanism\">Secular<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christian_humanism\" title=\"Christian humanism\">Christian<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Inclusivism\" title=\"Inclusivism\">Inclusivism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Monism\" title=\"Monism\">Monism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Monotheism\" title=\"Monotheism\">Monotheism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mysticism\" title=\"Mysticism\">Mysticism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Naturalism_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"Naturalism (philosophy)\">Naturalism<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Metaphysical_naturalism\" title=\"Metaphysical naturalism\">Metaphysical<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Religious_naturalism\" title=\"Religious naturalism\">Religious<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Humanistic_naturalism\" title=\"Humanistic naturalism\">Humanistic<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/New_Age\" title=\"New Age\">New Age<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nondualism\" title=\"Nondualism\">Nondualism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nontheism\" title=\"Nontheism\">Nontheism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pandeism\" title=\"Pandeism\">Pandeism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pantheism\" title=\"Pantheism\">Pantheism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Perennial_philosophy\" title=\"Perennial philosophy\">Perennialism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Polytheism\" title=\"Polytheism\">Polytheism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Process_theology\" title=\"Process theology\">Process theology<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Spiritualism_%28beliefs%29\" title=\"Spiritualism (beliefs)\">Spiritualism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Shamanism\" title=\"Shamanism\">Shamanism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/East_Asian_religions\" title=\"East Asian religions\">Taoic<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theism\" title=\"Theism\">Theism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Transcendentalism\" title=\"Transcendentalism\">Transcendentalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_philosophical_theories\" title=\"List of philosophical theories\">more&#8230;<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span style=\"display: none;\">Philosophers<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span style=\"display: none;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Albrecht_Ritschl\" title=\"Albrecht Ritschl\">Albrecht Ritschl<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Alvin_Plantinga\" title=\"Alvin Plantinga\">Alvin Plantinga<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Anselm_of_Canterbury\" title=\"Anselm of Canterbury\">Anselm of Canterbury<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Antony_Flew\" title=\"Antony Flew\">Antony Flew<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Anthony_Kenny\" title=\"Anthony Kenny\">Anthony Kenny<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Augustine_of_Hippo\" title=\"Augustine of Hippo\">Augustine of Hippo<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Averroes\" title=\"Averroes\">Averroes<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Baron_d%27Holbach\" title=\"Baron d'Holbach\">Baron d&#8217;Holbach<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Baruch_Spinoza\" title=\"Baruch Spinoza\">Baruch Spinoza<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Blaise_Pascal\" title=\"Blaise Pascal\">Blaise Pascal<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bertrand_Russell\" title=\"Bertrand Russell\">Bertrand Russell<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Boethius\" title=\"Boethius\">Boethius<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/D._Z._Phillips\" title=\"D. Z. Phillips\">D. Z. Phillips<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/David_Hume\" title=\"David Hume\">David Hume<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Desiderius_Erasmus\" title=\"Desiderius Erasmus\">Desiderius Erasmus<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Emil_Brunner\" title=\"Emil Brunner\">Emil Brunner<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ernst_Cassirer\" title=\"Ernst Cassirer\">Ernst Cassirer<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ernst_Haeckel\" title=\"Ernst Haeckel\">Ernst Haeckel<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ernst_Troeltsch\" title=\"Ernst Troeltsch\">Ernst Troeltsch<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Friedrich_Schleiermacher\" title=\"Friedrich Schleiermacher\">Friedrich Schleiermacher<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Friedrich_Nietzsche\" title=\"Friedrich Nietzsche\">Friedrich Nietzsche<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gaunilo_of_Marmoutiers\" title=\"Gaunilo of Marmoutiers\">Gaunilo of Marmoutiers<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Georg_Wilhelm_Friedrich_Hegel\" title=\"Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel\">Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/George_Santayana\" title=\"George Santayana\">George Santayana<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Harald_H%C3%B8ffding\" title=\"Harald H\u00f8ffding\">Harald H\u00f8ffding<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Heraclitus\" title=\"Heraclitus\">Heraclitus<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jean-Luc_Marion\" title=\"Jean-Luc Marion\">Jean-Luc Marion<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lev_Shestov\" title=\"Lev Shestov\">Lev Shestov<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Loyal_Rue\" title=\"Loyal Rue\">Loyal Rue<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Martin_Buber\" title=\"Martin Buber\">Martin Buber<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Martin_Lings\" title=\"Martin Lings\">Martin Lings<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mircea_Eliade\" title=\"Mircea Eliade\">Mircea Eliade<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Immanuel_Kant\" title=\"Immanuel Kant\">Immanuel Kant<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/J._L._Mackie\" title=\"J. L. Mackie\">J. L. Mackie<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Johann_Gottfried_Herder\" title=\"Johann Gottfried Herder\">Johann Gottfried Herder<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Karl_Barth\" title=\"Karl Barth\">Karl Barth<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ludwig_Feuerbach\" title=\"Ludwig Feuerbach\">Ludwig Feuerbach<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Maimonides\" title=\"Maimonides\">Maimonides<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paul_Tillich\" title=\"Paul Tillich\">Paul Tillich<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pavel_Florensky\" title=\"Pavel Florensky\">Pavel Florensky<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peter_Geach\" title=\"Peter Geach\">Peter Geach<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Giovanni_Pico_della_Mirandola\" title=\"Giovanni Pico della Mirandola\">Pico della Mirandola<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Reinhold_Niebuhr\" title=\"Reinhold Niebuhr\">Reinhold Niebuhr<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ren%C3%A9_Descartes\" title=\"Ren\u00e9 Descartes\">Ren\u00e9 Descartes<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rene_Guenon\" title=\"Rene Guenon\">Rene Guenon<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Richard_Swinburne\" title=\"Richard Swinburne\">Richard Swinburne<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_Merrihew_Adams\" title=\"Robert Merrihew Adams\">Robert Merrihew Adams<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rudolf_Otto\" title=\"Rudolf Otto\">Rudolf Otto<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/S%C3%B8ren_Kierkegaard\" title=\"S\u00f8ren Kierkegaard\">S\u00f8ren Kierkegaard<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sergei_Bulgakov\" title=\"Sergei Bulgakov\">Sergei Bulgakov<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_Aquinas\" title=\"Thomas Aquinas\">Thomas Aquinas<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_Chubb\" title=\"Thomas Chubb\">Thomas Chubb<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Vladimir_Solovyov_%28philosopher%29\" title=\"Vladimir Solovyov (philosopher)\">Vladimir Solovyov<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Walter_Kaufmann_%28philosopher%29\" title=\"Walter Kaufmann (philosopher)\">Walter Kaufmann<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Alston\" title=\"William Alston\">William Alston<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_James\" title=\"William James\">William James<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Lane_Craig\" title=\"William Lane Craig\">William Lane Craig<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Kingdon_Clifford\" title=\"William Kingdon Clifford\">W.K. Clifford<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_L._Rowe\" title=\"William L. Rowe\">William L. Rowe<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Whewell\" title=\"William Whewell\">William Whewell<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Wollaston\" title=\"William Wollaston\">William Wollaston<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Category:Philosophers_of_religion\" title=\"Category:Philosophers of religion\">more&#8230;<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span style=\"display: none;\">Existentialism<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span style=\"display: none;\">For <\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_beauty\" title=\"Argument from beauty\">Beauty<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christological_argument\" title=\"Christological argument\">Christological<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_consciousness\" title=\"Argument from consciousness\">Consciousness<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cosmological_argument\" title=\"Cosmological argument\">Cosmological<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_degree\" title=\"Argument from degree\">Degree<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_desire\" title=\"Argument from desire\">Desire<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_religious_experience\" title=\"Argument from religious experience\">Experience<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_love\" title=\"Argument from love\">Love<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_miracles\" title=\"Argument from miracles\">Miracles<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_morality\" title=\"Argument from morality\">Morality<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ontological_argument\" title=\"Ontological argument\">Ontological<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pascal%27s_Wager\" title=\"Pascal's Wager\">Pascal&#8217;s Wager<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_a_proper_basis\" title=\"Argument from a proper basis\">Proper basis<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_Reason\" title=\"Argument from Reason\">Reason<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Teleological_argument\" title=\"Teleological argument\">Teleological<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Natural-law_argument\" title=\"Natural-law argument\">Natural law<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Transcendental_argument_for_the_existence_of_God\" title=\"Transcendental argument for the existence of God\">Transcendental<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Witness_argument\" title=\"Witness argument\">Witness<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Against<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em><span style=\"display: none;\">Related Topics<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ultimate_Boeing_747_gambit\" title=\"Ultimate Boeing 747 gambit\">747 Gambit<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Atheist%27s_Wager\" title=\"Atheist's Wager\">Atheist&#8217;s Wager<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Problem_of_evil\" title=\"Problem of evil\">Evil<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_free_will\" title=\"Argument from free will\">Free will<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Problem_of_Hell\" title=\"Problem of Hell\">Hell<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_inconsistent_revelations\" title=\"Argument from inconsistent revelations\">Inconsistent revelations<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_nonbelief\" title=\"Argument from nonbelief\">Nonbelief<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theological_noncognitivism\" title=\"Theological noncognitivism\">Noncognitivism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Occam%27s_razor\" title=\"Occam's razor\">Occam&#8217;s razor<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Omnipotence_paradox\" title=\"Omnipotence paradox\">Omnipotence<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argument_from_poor_design\" title=\"Argument from poor design\">Poor design<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Russell%27s_teapot\" title=\"Russell's teapot\">Russell&#8217;s teapot<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fate_of_the_unlearned\" title=\"Fate of the unlearned\">Fate of the unlearned<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">Positions<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\"><span lang=\"EN\">By Historical Era<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ancient_philosophy\" title=\"Ancient philosophy\">Ancient<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Axial_Age\" title=\"Axial Age\">Axial Age<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Western_philosophy\" title=\"Western philosophy\">Western<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Medieval_philosophy\" title=\"Medieval philosophy\">Medieval<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Renaissance_philosophy\" title=\"Renaissance philosophy\">Renaissance<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Modern_philosophy\" title=\"Modern philosophy\">Modern<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eastern_philosophy\" title=\"Eastern philosophy\">Eastern<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Contemporary_philosophy\" title=\"Contemporary philosophy\">Contemporary<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Analytic_philosophy\" title=\"Analytic philosophy\">Analytic<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Continental_philosophy\" title=\"Continental philosophy\">Continental<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Ancient<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0Chinese\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Agriculturalism\" title=\"Agriculturalism\">Agriculturalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Confucianism\" title=\"Confucianism\">Confucianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Legalism_%28Chinese_philosophy%29\" title=\"Legalism (Chinese philosophy)\">Legalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/School_of_Names\" title=\"School of Names\">Logicians<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mohism\" title=\"Mohism\">Mohism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/School_of_Naturalists\" title=\"School of Naturalists\">Chinese naturalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neotaoism\" title=\"Neotaoism\">Neotaoism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Taoism\" title=\"Taoism\">Taoism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Zen\" title=\"Zen\">Zen<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ancient_Greek_philosophy\" title=\"Ancient Greek philosophy\">Greek<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hellenistic_philosophy\" title=\"Hellenistic philosophy\">Greco-Roman<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Aristotelianism\" title=\"Aristotelianism\">Aristotelianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cynicism\" title=\"Cynicism\">Cynicism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Epicureanism\" title=\"Epicureanism\">Epicureanism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neoplatonism\" title=\"Neoplatonism\">Neoplatonism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peripatetic_school\" title=\"Peripatetic school\">Peripatetic<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Platonism\" title=\"Platonism\">Platonism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pre-Socratic_philosophy\" title=\"Pre-Socratic philosophy\">Presocratic<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pythagoreanism\" title=\"Pythagoreanism\">Pythagoreanism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sophism\" title=\"Sophism\">Sophism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stoicism\" title=\"Stoicism\">Stoicism<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> Indian\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Buddhist_philosophy\" title=\"Buddhist philosophy\">Buddhist<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/C%C4%81rv%C4%81ka\" title=\"C\u0101rv\u0101ka\">C\u0101rv\u0101ka<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hindu_philosophy\" title=\"Hindu philosophy\">Hindu<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jain_philosophy\" title=\"Jain philosophy\">Jain<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> Persian\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mazdak#Mazdakism\" title=\"Mazdak\">Mazdakism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Zoroastrianism\" title=\"Zoroastrianism\">Zoroastrianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Zurvanism\" title=\"Zurvanism\">Zurvanism<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">9<sup>th<\/sup> to 16<sup>th<\/sup> Centuries<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christian_philosophy\" title=\"Christian philosophy\">Christian<\/a> Europe\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Scholasticism\" title=\"Scholasticism\">Scholasticism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Renaissance_humanism\" title=\"Renaissance humanism\">Renaissance humanism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomism\" title=\"Thomism\">Thomism<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> East Asian\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Korean_Confucianism\" title=\"Korean Confucianism\">Korean Confucianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neo-Confucianism_in_Japan\" title=\"Neo-Confucianism in Japan\">Rigaku<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neo-Confucianism\" title=\"Neo-Confucianism\">Neo-Confucianism<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Islamic_philosophy\" title=\"Islamic philosophy\">Islamic<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Averroism\" title=\"Averroism\">Averroism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Avicenna#Avicennian_philosophy\" title=\"Avicenna\">Avicennism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Illuminationism#Persian_school_of_Illuminationism\" title=\"Illuminationism\">Persian Illuminationism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sufi_philosophy\" title=\"Sufi philosophy\">Sufi<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jewish_philosophy\" title=\"Jewish philosophy\">Jewish<\/a>\u00a0(<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Judeo-Islamic_philosophies_%28800%E2%80%931400%29\" title=\"Judeo-Islamic philosophies (800\u20131400)\">Judeo-Islamic<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">17<sup>th<\/sup> to 21<sup>st<\/sup> Centuries<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Absolute_idealism\" title=\"Absolute idealism\">Absolute idealism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Australian_realism\" title=\"Australian realism\">Australian realism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Behaviorism\" title=\"Behaviorism\">Behaviorism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cartesianism\" title=\"Cartesianism\">Cartesianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Classical_liberalism\" title=\"Classical liberalism\">Classical liberalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Deconstruction\" title=\"Deconstruction\">Deconstruction<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dialectical_materialism\" title=\"Dialectical materialism\">Dialectical materialism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Epiphenomenalism\" title=\"Epiphenomenalism\">Epiphenomenalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ethical_egoism\" title=\"Ethical egoism\">Egoism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Existentialism\" title=\"Existentialism\">Existentialism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Feminist_philosophy\" title=\"Feminist philosophy\">Feminist<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Functionalism_%28philosophy_of_mind%29\" title=\"Functionalism (philosophy of mind)\">Functionalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hegelianism\" title=\"Hegelianism\">Hegelianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kantianism\" title=\"Kantianism\">Kantianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kyoto_school\" title=\"Kyoto school\">Kyoto school<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Legal_positivism\" title=\"Legal positivism\">Legal positivism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Logical_positivism\" title=\"Logical positivism\">Logical positivism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Marxist_philosophy\" title=\"Marxist philosophy\">Marxism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mitogaku\" title=\"Mitogaku\">Mitogaku<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Modernism\" title=\"Modernism\">Modernism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neo-Kantianism\" title=\"Neo-Kantianism\">Neo-Kantianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/New_Confucianism\" title=\"New Confucianism\">New Confucianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/New_Philosophers\" title=\"New Philosophers\">New Philosophers<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Objectivism_%28Ayn_Rand%29\" title=\"Objectivism (Ayn Rand)\">Objectivism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ordinary_language_philosophy\" title=\"Ordinary language philosophy\">Ordinary language<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Moral_particularism\" title=\"Moral particularism\">Particularism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Phenomenology_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"Phenomenology (philosophy)\">Phenomenology<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Postmodern_philosophy\" title=\"Postmodern philosophy\">Postmodernism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Post-structuralism\" title=\"Post-structuralism\">Post-structuralism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pragmatism\" title=\"Pragmatism\">Pragmatism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Reformed_epistemology\" title=\"Reformed epistemology\">Reformed epistemology<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Structuralism\" title=\"Structuralism\">Structuralism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Transcendentalism\" title=\"Transcendentalism\">Transcendentalism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Transmodernism\" title=\"Transmodernism\">Transmodernism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Utilitarianism\" title=\"Utilitarianism\">Utilitarianism<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <em><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_philosophies\" title=\"List of philosophies\">more&#8230;<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span>Philosophy of<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Metaphysics\" title=\"Metaphysics\">Metaphysics<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Epistemology\" title=\"Epistemology\">Epistemology<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Logic\" title=\"Logic\">Logic<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ethics\" title=\"Ethics\">Ethics<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Aesthetics\" title=\"Aesthetics\">Aesthetics<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Branches<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Action_theory_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"Action theory (philosophy)\">Action<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Aesthetics\" title=\"Aesthetics\">Art<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ontology\" title=\"Ontology\">Being<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_biology\" title=\"Philosophy of biology\">Biology<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_chemistry\" title=\"Philosophy of chemistry\">Chemistry<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_education\" title=\"Philosophy of education\">Education<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_and_economics\" title=\"Philosophy and economics\">Economics<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_engineering\" title=\"Philosophy of engineering\">Engineering<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Environmental_philosophy\" title=\"Environmental philosophy\">Environment<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_film\" title=\"Philosophy of film\">Film<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_geography\" title=\"Philosophy of geography\">Geography<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_information\" title=\"Philosophy of information\">Information<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_healthcare\" title=\"Philosophy of healthcare\">Healthcare<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_history\" title=\"Philosophy of history\">History<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophical_anthropology\" title=\"Philosophical anthropology\">Human nature<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Theories_of_humour\" title=\"Theories of humour\">Humor<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_language\" title=\"Philosophy of language\">Language<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jurisprudence\" title=\"Jurisprudence\">Law<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_and_literature\" title=\"Philosophy and literature\">Literature<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_mathematics\" title=\"Philosophy of mathematics\">Mathematics<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_mind\" title=\"Philosophy of mind\">Mind<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_music\" title=\"Philosophy of music\">Music<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pain_%28philosophy%29\" title=\"Pain (philosophy)\">Pain<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Metaphilosophy\" title=\"Metaphilosophy\">Philosophy<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_physics\" title=\"Philosophy of physics\">Physics<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Political_philosophy\" title=\"Political philosophy\">Politics<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_psychology\" title=\"Philosophy of psychology\">Psychology<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_religion\" title=\"Philosophy of religion\">Religion<\/a> (<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hermeneutics\" title=\"Hermeneutics\">Hermeneutics<\/a>)\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_science\" title=\"Philosophy of science\">Science<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_sex\" title=\"Philosophy of sex\">Sexuality<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_social_science\" title=\"Philosophy of social science\">Social science<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_technology\" title=\"Philosophy of technology\">Technology<\/a>\u00a0<strong>\u00b7<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Philosophy_of_war\" title=\"Philosophy of war\">War<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">By Region<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-left: 19.2pt;\">\u00a0<span lang=\"EN\">Retrieved from &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;oldid=454081250\">http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;oldid=454081250<\/a>&#8221; <\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\" lang=\"EN\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"font-variant: small-caps; color: black; text-decoration: none;\" lang=\"EN-GB\">rationes seminales<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<span class=\"facetname\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\">Subject<\/span><span class=\"topiclist\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"> <span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">Philosophy<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h4><span class=\"facetname\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\">DOI:<\/span><span class=\"topiclist\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"> 10.1111\/b.9781405106795.2004.x <\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n<p>\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: black; text-decoration: none;\">Extract<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\">Ancient greek philosophy, philosophy of religion, philosophy of science [Latin, from the Greek logoi spermatikoi , germinal principles or original factors] A notion employed by the Stoics, Neoplatonists , and Augustine It is usually translated as seminal reason or seminal virtue By this term Augustine meant the seeds, potential powers , or causes of the subsequent developments in the physical order after God &#8216;s creation . Change is simply the realization of what already exists virtually. These seeds were themselves created by God when he created the world. The view was intended to reconcile the tension between the belief that God created all things and the evident fact that new things are constantly developing, for according to this view, the development of every new thing is simply the unfolding of what has been in the world from the beginning. It is a metaphor, derived from the growth of a plant, which is the realization of the seed&#8217;s latencies. The concept was possibly influenced by Plato &#8216;s theory of recollection , according to which knowledge involves remembering what one already knew. This term was later developed by the Franciscans to oppose Aristotelian naturalism. \u201cAugustine aptly termed rationes seminales all those active and passive powers that are the originative sources of the coming into being of natural things and of their changing.\u201d Aquinas, &#8230; log in or subscribe to read full text<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: black; text-decoration: none;\">Bibliographic Details<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: black; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\">Edited by: <\/span><span style=\"color: windowtext; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;\">NICHOLAS BUNNIN and JIYUAN YU <br \/> <\/span><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\">eISBN:<\/span><span style=\"color: windowtext; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;\"> 9781405106795<br \/> <\/span><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\">Print publication date:<\/span><span style=\"color: windowtext; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none;\"> 2004 <\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: black; text-decoration: none;\">Table of Contents<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: black; text-decoration: none;\">The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy <\/span><\/a><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<ul type=\"disc\">\n<ul type=\"circle\">\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">rational self-interest, <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">rational theology, <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">rationalism <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">rationality <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">Hume <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><span class=\"selection\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\">rationes seminales <\/span><\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">ravens paradox, <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">Rawls, John (1921\u20132002) <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">ready-to-hand <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediawiki.org\/\"><span style=\"color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;\"><span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: blue;\">real definitios <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 Response to Faith with thr Bible Bible texts: www.biblegateway.com A. The Bible as Guide in Life and Liturgy (Sunday Readings) B. The Bible in Dialogue with Questions of the &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sunday-readings"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1647,"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4\/revisions\/1647"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sundayscriptureonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}